I’m hearing from some readers that fb and maybe twitter are flagging this article as misinformation ~24h after posting. Let’s see what happens! bostonmagazine.com/news/2020/09/0…
I think I figured out what's happening. It's past 24h now and I have not seen a misinformation warning on shares of the article (thank goodness). The misinfo tag pops up when people share the article alongside text saying that SARS2 was most likely engineered in a lab.
For the record, I think all 3 scenarios: pre-adaptation, pre-circulation in humans, lab-based origins are -plausible- and must continue to be investigated. It's not productive to be guessing the probabilities of each scenario. Game-changing evidence can emerge any time.
Take a look at the past 9 months: people were going crazy about the seafood market & Chinese people eating bats in early 2020, then we went through a pangolin phase (some continue to swear by pangolins being the intermediate host), and now pre-circulation in humans is in vogue...
How SARS2 transmitted from bats, maybe through an intermediate host, into humans is still an open question with no evidence of the virus having ever passed through an intermediate. Despite testing millions of people & animals worldwide, we haven't found a SARS2 precursor/sibling.
It's like someone looking for their keys the morning after a long night of partying. They've ransacked their coats, laundry, living room (the most likely places), but are refusing to check the bedroom or kitchen because they've never left their keys in these areas before...
It could be unlikely, but maybe in a few minutes, they'll remember that they raided the fridge for leftovers last night and left the keys in there by accident for the first time ever. You may as well check the kitchen/fridge before pulling the floorboards out of the living room.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Senior advisor to Anthony Fauci finally charged for concealing federal records following a criminal referral from former House COVID Subcommittee Chairman Brad Wenstrup.
“I can either send stuff to Tony on his private Gmail [sic], or hand it to him at work or at his house,” Morens wrote in one April 21, 2021, email. “He is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble.”
"Information in the indictment indicates the co-conspirators are Dr. Peter Daszak, the president of Manhattan-based non-profit EcoHealth Alliance, and Dr. Gerald Keusch, an associate director of Boston University’s National Emerging Infectious Disease Laboratory..."
In 2023 emails shared by @gdemaneuf, Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance and Gerald Keusch from Boston's high containment pathogen lab conspired to recruit prominent friends to push back on calls for increased oversight of research that can kill millions of people.
David Morens (the above charged senior advisor to Fauci) and Peter Hotez are cc'ed on these emails.
Listened to 'Privatizing the Apocalypse', a conversation on the dangers of virus hunting & pandemic resurrection between @Rob_Reid & Sam Harris @MakingSenseHQ
The number of people capable of causing pandemics is growing. Governments are not tracking & regulating this research.
The @BrookingsInst event on the media's role in investigating Covid origins is livestreaming: brookings.edu/events/the-rol…
@BrookingsInst "I don't think I've ever investigated a story where there were as many obstacles as this." - @KatherineEban @VanityFair on Covid origins reporting.
@BrookingsInst @KatherineEban @VanityFair "It was incredibly hostile on social media... I was called every name in the book. I was very lucky to have a publication and editor who they were like 'We don't care what people think and what they say. We just care if we're right and our story is accurate.'" - @KatherineEban
Jeremy Farrar, the scientist who orchestrated the Proximal Origin letter was not named as an author or acknowledged. He was the director of the Wellcome Trust and had funded one of the authors.
@WHO None of these major funders who funded the Proximal Origin authors were acknowledged in the paper although Kristian Andersen privately thanked them for their advice and leadership as they worked on the letter.
The executive order signed on Monday was not a ban or moratorium on risky pathogen research with the potential to cause pandemics.
It was a charge for OSTP and other agency heads to come up with a new policy & strategy for governing and tracking such research in under 180 days.
I do not see any wording in the executive order asking scientists to pause their research if it falls under the definition of dangerous gain-of-function. whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…
The executive order is a step in the right direction and I hope that @WHOSTP47 will come up with an improved policy and strategy for pathogen research with catastrophic risks.
But right now, the executive order is not a ban or even a moratorium.