Jonathan Cook Profile picture
Sep 20, 2020 4 tweets 1 min read Read on X
When lawyers for the US yet again quote from a book by the Guardian's David Leigh in a desperate bid to bolster their flimsy case against Julian Assange, investigative journalist Nicky Hager replies: 'I would not regard that [book] as a reliable source' craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2020/…
Nicky Hager is the latest journalist to strenuously deny criticisms of Assange made by David Leigh and Luke Harding in their book. Assange was committed to redacting names before publication, says Hager. He attributes the criticism instead to Guardian 'animosity' towards Assange
Ex-ambassador Craig Murray points out that the ‘bad blood’ between the Guardian and Assange related not to redaction issues, as Leigh claims in his book, but the fact that Assange refused to give the Guardian rights to a biography, which they hoped would be a big money-spinner
Craig Murray also makes the telling point that, even though the US relies constantly on Leigh and Harding's highly contentious claims in the book to aid their case, neither Guardian journalist has chosen to appear in court to be cross-examined or spoken to set the record straight

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Cook

Jonathan Cook Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jonathan_K_Cook

Sep 20, 2023
Yes, everyone knows that Ukraine has long been one of the most corrupt countries on the planet.

But keep quiet. The only people stressing about it are Putin apologists Image
Yes, everyone knows that Ukraine has a serious problem with Nazis, including within its armed forces.

But keep quiet. The only people stressing about it are Putin apologists Image
Yes, everyone knows that the US meddled in Ukrainian politics in 2014 to get their guy in and start bringing Nato weaponry to Russia’s border.

But keep quiet. The only people stressing about it are Putin apologists
Read 6 tweets
Jun 5, 2023
Another shameful day for the deeply compromised NUJ. It has deleted its statement of protest at counter-terrorism police interrogating and threatening investigative journalist Kit Klarenberg as he returned to the UK.

Why are we paying dues to this fraudulent union? ImageImage
The same union sold out Craig Murray by rejecting his membership. In doing so, the NUJ as good as legitimised the Scottish courts' view that independent journalists can be denied the protections afforded state-corporate journalists. I wrote about it here: jonathan-cook.net/blog/2021-07-3…
And yet again we see despicable, self-sabotaging behaviour from privileged journalists like Peter Jukes. As they whine about social media etiquette, and police who should be allowed to do journalism, the most basic journalistic protections are being snatched from us Image
Read 5 tweets
Jun 2, 2023
My latest: The 2020s looks set to be the decade when the BBC cuts out the middleman – 'counter-terrorism experts' – and subjects us to a parade of its own employees posturing as 'counter-disinformation experts' middleeasteye.net/opinion/uk-bbc…
Their job will be to explain why some people must be denied a platform to protect the public from 'thoughtcrimes'. It will be essentially the same counterterrorism agenda, with similar goals, but dressed in new garb
We already know how this works. Show solidarity with Palestinians against the apartheid rule of Israel, the West’s key military ally in the Middle East, and you are dubbed an 'antisemite'
Read 6 tweets
May 15, 2023
1. Part of the answer – the bit George Monbiot ignores (again) – is this:

The public is primed into docility by corporate media outlets that, however they window-dress, promote the same basic value: Us good, them bad.

That binary worldview is then easily turned inwards. Thread/
2. Monbiot's a perfect illustration of how this works. Rather than deal with the arguments of those breaking out of the corporate media’s binary view of foreign affairs (on Russia, China, Syria, Iran) he demonises them as Putin apologists, genocide deniers, war crimes enablers
3. But what he’s really done is lay the ground for the very slide into authoritarianism at home he so bewails.

That’s why he was such a sucker for the antisemitism smear campaign against Jeremy Corbyn, and why he’s such a lifeless supporter of Julian Assange
Read 9 tweets
Apr 6, 2023
My latest: There was not a 'clash' at Al-Aqsa. It is not the latest episode in a 'conflict' between Israeli and Palestinians. Those supposedly 'neutral' terms conceal what's really happening: apartheid and ethnic cleansing middleeasteye.net/opinion/aqsa-m…
Just as there is a consistent, discernible pattern to Israel’s crimes against Palestinians, there is a parallel, discernible pattern in the western media’s misleading reporting on Israel and Palestine
Reporters describing Israeli state violence against Palestinians as 'clashes' are committing the cardinal journalistic sin Archbishop Tutu warned of.

They're not just siding with the oppressor, they're intensifying the oppression. They are providing the cover story for it
Read 5 tweets
Apr 6, 2023
My latest: Into a headline of just six words, the BBC crammed three bogusly 'neutral' words, whose function was not to illuminate or even to report, but to trick the audience, as the late Archbishop Desmond Tutu warned, into siding with the oppressor middleeasteye.net/opinion/aqsa-m…
The 'clashes' at al-Aqsa, in the BBC’s telling, presume a violent encounter between two groups: Palestinians, described by Israel and echoed by the BBC as 'agitators', on one side; and Israeli forces of law and order on the other
That's the context, the BBC implies, for why unarmed Palestinians at worship need to be beaten. The message is reinforced by the description of the seizure of 100s of Palestinians as 'arrests' - as if an occupying, belligerent security force is equitably upholding the law
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(