So this shows the kinds of clear votes that the GA scanners fail to “see”, and also, fail to flag as ambiguous, so they’re lost.
(It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you, it’s what you know that ain’t so.)
(It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you, it’s what you know that ain’t so.)
https://twitter.com/marilynrmarks1/status/1307761686783373314
How many real voters make marks like these? We don’t know, because they don’t do human audits in GA! (By SOS regs, only votes the _machine_ days are ambiguous can be human-reviewed.)
But we can make informed guesses: New voters unfamiliar with the systems. Voters rushed or hurried because they’re filling out a provisional ballot on a side table. Voters whose first language is not English. Voters who lack good hand/eye coordination to fill in tiny bubbles.
There are going to be statistically significant effects as this will disenfranchise different kinds of voters at different rates. And of course any voter being disenfranchised is not acceptable.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
