Christian leaders with a significant amount of clout need to recognize that, for better or for worse, many Christians look up to them. Not only actions and words but also inaction and silence play a formative role on people these leaders may never see face to face.
This is especially important for Christian leaders to consider if they think that they can make necessary change simply "behind closed doors" without the need of a prophetic and public voice. When you do not speak the truth boldly and publicly, you perpetuate cycles of abuse and
injustice.
If you remain publicly associated with institutions that have a track record of damaging the witness of the gospel without voicing opposition, you are helping the institutions continue to wreak havoc.
I say these things as someone who has had conversations with
influential Christian leaders who "behind closed doors" would talk of the need for change and support for ending injustices within the church and Christian institutions but then would continue to remain connected to ministries that protected spiritual abusers, racists, and other
deep injustices.
I've seen young and eager Christians wanting to follow the footsteps of influential Christian leaders by attending seminaries and churches associated with the Christian leaders, and then ended up on the receiving end of horrendous spiritual abuse, abuse of
power, and vitriolic and unchecked racism. Some have even left the faith because of their experiences.
I hope and pray for Christian leaders who would at the bare minimum would be willing to be like Paul who confronted Peter publicly when things were not in step with the gospel.
I hope and pray for Christian leaders who are willing to take a stand against the "super apostles" in their midst in solidarity with the abused and beaten. I hope and pray for Christian leaders who will call out other leaders in sin, like Nathan to David.
We can talk about
"celebrity pastors" and the danger of platform for Christian leaders all we want, but the solution isn't to pretend that influential leadership doesn't exist. We need to foster an "imitate me as I imitate Christ" spiritual formation. This will breathe life into the deep void of
godly Christian leadership.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Scot McKnight and Laura Barringer in A Church Called Tov write: "False narratives are not just 'spin' or even 'brand protection,' though they may be that, too. They are darkness. They are the opposite of light."
Here's an example.
After our former pastor resigned
and caused the destruction of our church because of his grievously sinful actions, he got a new position as senior pastor in New York. He was interviewed by the Long Island Herald and explained the closure of our church as such:
"It was young and small and Covid wrecked us...
There was so much trouble for a small church to handle, and we couldn't afford to continue."
A pastor who is held captive to image and whose identity has become enmeshed with their ministry is unable to be honest, vulnerable, and transparent about how their church is actually doing. They will hide financial struggles or take unethical routes to pay the church's bills.
They will avoid difficult conversations that affect the health of the church and will shirk their discipleship responsibilities for outward appearances of churchliness. They will hyperfocus on details that make the church look good (eg the best coffee, the best potlucks) and
neglect the weightier matters of church life and wellness. They will go out of their way to make themselves feel needed by others and even see themselves as the cornerstone holding up the church and keeping it from falling apart. They will flatter those who are gifted in order
This is the game that they love to play - they claim to have some secret set of information that only they know that completely acquits the abuser no matter how guilty they appear to be, but they won't release that secret set of information.
Columbus Metro Presbytery would not release the minutes of our church's session minutes during the time that they had a committee sit in to (purportedly) bring extra accountability after our pastor got caught in his sin. They also refused to release their report and
recommendations. The only way that one of the members of our church was able to even see these was because he kept following up with them for MONTHS until he was granted a time to see them in person while being monitored by a representative of presbytery. In fact, it *should have
I was stopped in my tracks when I read this quote.
“'The unborn' are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don’t resent your condescension or
complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don’t ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don’t need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don’t bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow
you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power,
I've noticed that there are generally three progressive levels of complementarianism. The first is ministerial complementarianism, where women are only barred from ordained offices. The second is familial complementarianism, where, in addition to the constraints of ministerial
complementarianism, women are barred from certain types of roles within their household. The third is societal complementarianism, where, in addition to the constraints of the first two types, women are barred from certain types of roles within society at large.
Even though I disagree with it, very, very rarely have I even seen a church hold strictly to just ministerial complementarianism. It's often a very quick slide from ministerial complementarianism to familial complementarianism and then again to societal complementarianism.
In Christian circles, the expression of anger is often connected to power. There are those who are afforded the right to express their anger freely and to have righteousness be attributed to it. There are others who are never allowed to express anger.
Those who can freely
express their anger also receive a wide range of grace, so that an instance of unrighteous anger is tucked away under righteous intent or ends. Those who are never allowed to express their anger are given no grace, so that anytime they step out of line, they lose all rapport.
Those who can express anger are rewarded for being "passionate" and "living out convictions." Others are rewarded for repressing their anger, being told that it's glorifying to God to be a doormat.
Expressions of anger, as they are connected to power, are necessarily connected