Justice Singh notes that it has received a status report from teh Grievance Redressal Committee.
I have given data on how many students appeared in the OBE. The data was recorded by the Division Bench of the Court: Adv M Rupal for DU.
This data is for the first data. It includes everything: Adv Rupal as he asks the Court to take a look at the DB order.
Why can't you file an affidavit: Court
I'll send the affidavit filed before the DB: Adv Rupal
OBE has been a big success. The participation in the first phase was as much as in normal examination: Senior Adv Sachin Dutta for DU
Even for the second phase, most students have opted for online mode: Dutta
Senior Dutta informs the Court about the arrangement for students who wish to go abroad for higher education.
For PG students who are going abroad, we will declare results give month itself: Dutta
Senior Adv BB Gupta says that the issue of remuneration of the Chairperson of the Grievance Redressal Committee is still persisting.
There is an Acting Registrar. On the letter head, particulars can be given : Rupal
I don't think there's a need to do this.. I'll give three days maximum: Court as it notes that there is an order to this effect.
Adv Kamal Gupta from the Grievance Redressal Committee says that the Committee has not received any report from the Grievance Redressal Officers on the communication of the Committee's decision to the students.
There was a delay on my part. Now I have communicated all : Prof Ajay Arora (Grievance Redressal Officer)
How many complaints were there? : Court
23: Arora
Gupta points out that there were more.
23+9+7 decisions were there: Grievance Redressal Committee
Right from day 1, there is unnecessary suspension: Dutta for DU
DU is acting like that : Court
Mr Arora is saying that he has forwarded all decisions: Dutta
I'll personally talk to GRC and clarify. Please give me a date: Arora
The Court did not say anything. Your senior counsel is saying that you will file an affidavit: Court
You unnecessarily took it to an aggresive level : Court to DU counsel
Suppose something is missing, I'm a teacher by profession, I'll take care of it: Arora
You are being fair: Court
Court starts dictating the order.
Court records the submissions made before it.
Court records that the second phase was OBE is going on smoothly.
In case any decisions have been missed out, the same will be taken care of. Mr Arora is given two days to communicate ..: Court records
Let a complete statement on the date-wise communication of decision of GRC to students be given a status report : Court
There are many undergraduate students who have applied for special results but have not received. Also, certain Indian Universities are pressing for final results: Adv Akash Sinha
This issue is likely to be dealt by the Division Bench: Senior Adv BB Gupta
I'll deal with it after DB then: Court
Court is informed about the development before Division Bench with respect to students who are going abroad.
Can we be informed as to who are these Indian Universities who are pressing for final results? : Adv Kurup for UGC
I'm not appearing for them: Sinha
Adv Sinha to communicate it to Adv Kurup: Court records in order.
A large number of issues were sorted due to the inputs from Mr BB Gupta, Kamal Gupta and the Chairperson as well as court: Dutta
OBE was possible because of large no of people cooperating. There is no need to be aggressive: Court
Court notes that submission of intervenor counsel that the issue of data protection and privacy issues are pending.
Payment to GRC Chairperson be released within three days: Court
Mater adjourned till October 12.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Karnataka HC hears suo motu PIL case registered in connection with June 4 Chinnaswamy Stadium Stampede which left 11 people dead and injured over 50 people. Track thread for updates. Matter before Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice CM Joshi.
Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty says judicial commission has now submitted its report covering most of the issues raised, which has to be placed before legislature which is slated to sit in August.
DNA's counsel tells Court that it has challenged judicial commission's report on ground that commission did not follow natural justice principles and DNA's reputation is being affected meanwhile.
Delhi High Court to decide on October 30 the petitions filed by Delhi riots accused Sharjeel Imam challenging trial court order framing charges and quashing of Delhi Police chargesheet in connection with the December 2019 Jamia University violence during the protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA).
Justice Sanjeev Narula briefly heard the matter today.
Advocate Talib Mustafa appearing for Imam - Revision petition is challenging the trial court’s order on charge. All petitions arise of the same FIR. There is a separate writ petition also. Even prosecutors have come up against the same order.
Karnataka HC Division Bench hears appeal challenging single judge order directing National Law School of India University (NLSIU) Bengaluru to provide 0.5% reservation for transgender students in admissions until it comes out with its own transgender reservation policy.
Justices Anu Sivaraman and Rajesh Rai K are hearing the matter. Senior Advocate KG Raghavan appears for NLSIU, he says that the petitioner who whose plea the single judge order was passed was offered admission but he did not join and "missed the bus."
Raghavan: This was for the 3 year programme.
Raghavan tells Court that petitioner was told to pay the fee for admission to the course, and that he should fill financial aid form if he wished to avail financial aid.
Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of a media report highlighting deaths caused by rabies due to stray dog attacks on children and the elderly.
Bench: Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan
#SupremeCourt
Justice Pardiwala: This is a highly disturbing news report titled “City hounded by strays and kids pay price”. It contains extremely troubling details.
Justice Pardiwala: There are reports of hundreds of dog bite incidents from both cities and peripheral areas, many of which have led to rabies infections
Supreme Court will today hear the plea filed by tainted Allahabad High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma challenging the in-house committee report indicting him over the recovery of a large sum of unaccounted cash at his official residence in Delhi
#SupremeCourt #JusticeYashwantVarma
A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih to hear the case today #SupremeCourt
Justice Varma has sought a declaration that the recommendation made by the former Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna for his removal as High Court judge be declared unconstitutional and ultra vires #YashwantVarma #SupremeCourt
Supreme Court to shortly hear the case pertaining to release of #UdaipurFiles movie
#SupremeCourt
The Central government on Thursday told the Supreme Court that the movie Udaipur Files is about a particular crime and not against any particular community
Justice Kant: Have you filed any Petition in HC? How did Mr Sibal say that it was filed. First go to HC and pursue and then come here. Now other side says he is satisfied with central govt order and he does not want to pursue the case here. So you go to HC now. Why waste our time.
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: This can be transferred to the HC. I can go to the HC but matter was pending here.
Sr Adv Gaurav Bhatia: we are withdrawing it.
Sibal: that is fine ..we will challenge the Central govt order in HC