Justice Singh notes that it has received a status report from teh Grievance Redressal Committee.
I have given data on how many students appeared in the OBE. The data was recorded by the Division Bench of the Court: Adv M Rupal for DU.
This data is for the first data. It includes everything: Adv Rupal as he asks the Court to take a look at the DB order.
Why can't you file an affidavit: Court
I'll send the affidavit filed before the DB: Adv Rupal
OBE has been a big success. The participation in the first phase was as much as in normal examination: Senior Adv Sachin Dutta for DU
Even for the second phase, most students have opted for online mode: Dutta
Senior Dutta informs the Court about the arrangement for students who wish to go abroad for higher education.
For PG students who are going abroad, we will declare results give month itself: Dutta
Senior Adv BB Gupta says that the issue of remuneration of the Chairperson of the Grievance Redressal Committee is still persisting.
There is an Acting Registrar. On the letter head, particulars can be given : Rupal
I don't think there's a need to do this.. I'll give three days maximum: Court as it notes that there is an order to this effect.
Adv Kamal Gupta from the Grievance Redressal Committee says that the Committee has not received any report from the Grievance Redressal Officers on the communication of the Committee's decision to the students.
There was a delay on my part. Now I have communicated all : Prof Ajay Arora (Grievance Redressal Officer)
How many complaints were there? : Court
23: Arora
Gupta points out that there were more.
23+9+7 decisions were there: Grievance Redressal Committee
Right from day 1, there is unnecessary suspension: Dutta for DU
DU is acting like that : Court
Mr Arora is saying that he has forwarded all decisions: Dutta
I'll personally talk to GRC and clarify. Please give me a date: Arora
The Court did not say anything. Your senior counsel is saying that you will file an affidavit: Court
You unnecessarily took it to an aggresive level : Court to DU counsel
Suppose something is missing, I'm a teacher by profession, I'll take care of it: Arora
You are being fair: Court
Court starts dictating the order.
Court records the submissions made before it.
Court records that the second phase was OBE is going on smoothly.
In case any decisions have been missed out, the same will be taken care of. Mr Arora is given two days to communicate ..: Court records
Let a complete statement on the date-wise communication of decision of GRC to students be given a status report : Court
There are many undergraduate students who have applied for special results but have not received. Also, certain Indian Universities are pressing for final results: Adv Akash Sinha
This issue is likely to be dealt by the Division Bench: Senior Adv BB Gupta
I'll deal with it after DB then: Court
Court is informed about the development before Division Bench with respect to students who are going abroad.
Can we be informed as to who are these Indian Universities who are pressing for final results? : Adv Kurup for UGC
I'm not appearing for them: Sinha
Adv Sinha to communicate it to Adv Kurup: Court records in order.
A large number of issues were sorted due to the inputs from Mr BB Gupta, Kamal Gupta and the Chairperson as well as court: Dutta
OBE was possible because of large no of people cooperating. There is no need to be aggressive: Court
Court notes that submission of intervenor counsel that the issue of data protection and privacy issues are pending.
Payment to GRC Chairperson be released within three days: Court
Mater adjourned till October 12.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Whether chargesheet filed without Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report in case under NDPS Act, 1985 can be termed as 'incomplete report' under CrPC? #SupremeCourt to shortly hear the matter
A three-judge Bench of Justices Surya Kant, Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ujjal Bhuyan will also examine various related aspects that concern the fairness and efficacy of the trials under the NDPS Act
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear appeal by Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) against 2023 Delhi HC decision ruling that application for drawing sample of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substance before Magistrate u/s 52A of NDPS Act should be made within 72 hours @narcoticsbureau
In May 2023, the High Court had observed that such an application cannot be moved at the “whims and fancies” of Narcotics Control Bureau, being the prosecuting agency.
When matter came before Supreme Court earlier, the Court had orally remarked that Section 52A is enabling not mandatory.
Supreme Court to shortly deliver judgment laying down pan-India guidelines on use of bulldozer by state governments as a punitive measure to demolish house or shop of a person immediately after he or she is named as accused of an offence
#SupremeCourt
Judgement to be delivered by a bench of Justices BR Gavai and KV Vishwanathan
#SupremeCourt #bulldozer
Supreme Court Bar Association holds farewell for CJI DY Chandrachud #SupremeCourtofIndia
Sr Adv Rachana Srivastava, VP SCBA: CJI Chandrachud was a part of 23 constitution benches. Your journey in the legal world has pushed boundaries. You leave behind a court which has hope for all of us. You had unwavering dedication to the rule of law.
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal, President SCBA: when you have to journey the judge of any judge what is the benchmark. We can criticise a judge all we want. You have to judge the man in the backdrop of the times we live in. When we discuss him, his manner, his affability which is of one of the greatest judges of this country.
Ceremonial bench on the last working day of CJI DY Chandrachud
CJI Chandrachud along with CJI Designate Sanjiv Khanna, Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra
#SupremeCourt
Attorney General R Venkataramani: Recently in Brazil after the conference ended everyone started dancing. what if I ask everyone here to dance on your retirement and I am sure most will vote in favour of me.
SG Tushar Mehta: Complete impartiality in dispensation of justice. We were never hesitant in good or bad matters before you. For govt we won few we lost many but we knew that we did not get an opportunity to convince the court and put our point forward. My lord has always taken a stand as the karta of the family
DYC will really be missed.
#BREAKING Supreme Court to State of UP: How can you just enter someone's home and demolish it without following course of law or serving notice?
CJI DY Chandrachud: We are not inclined to accept the request of the State of UP to adjourn the proceedings since pleadings are completed and the court is required to evaluate the materials placed before to decide legality of action.
#SupremeCourtofIndia @myogioffice
CJI: The following position emerges from narration of facts: state of UP has not produced original width of state highway notified as national highway, no material was placed to show whether any inquiry was conducted to figure out encroachers, there is no material produced to indicate that land was acquired before demolition was carried out. The state has failed to disclose the precise extent of encroachments, the width of the existing road, the width of notified highway, extent of property of petitioner which feel within central line of highway and why the demolition was needed beyond the area of alleged encroachment. NHRC report shows demolition was far in excess than the area of alleged encroachment. #SupremeCourtofIndia
#BREAKING
CJI: The demolition was carried out without any notice or disclosure to the occupiers of the basis of the demarcation or the extent of demolition to be carried out. It is clear demolition was high handed and without the authority of law. The petitioner states the demolition was only because the petitioner had flagged irregularities in road construction in newspaper report. Such action by the state cannot be countenanced and when dealing with private property law has to be followed.