Justice Singh notes that it has received a status report from teh Grievance Redressal Committee.
I have given data on how many students appeared in the OBE. The data was recorded by the Division Bench of the Court: Adv M Rupal for DU.
This data is for the first data. It includes everything: Adv Rupal as he asks the Court to take a look at the DB order.
Why can't you file an affidavit: Court
I'll send the affidavit filed before the DB: Adv Rupal
OBE has been a big success. The participation in the first phase was as much as in normal examination: Senior Adv Sachin Dutta for DU
Even for the second phase, most students have opted for online mode: Dutta
Senior Dutta informs the Court about the arrangement for students who wish to go abroad for higher education.
For PG students who are going abroad, we will declare results give month itself: Dutta
Senior Adv BB Gupta says that the issue of remuneration of the Chairperson of the Grievance Redressal Committee is still persisting.
There is an Acting Registrar. On the letter head, particulars can be given : Rupal
I don't think there's a need to do this.. I'll give three days maximum: Court as it notes that there is an order to this effect.
Adv Kamal Gupta from the Grievance Redressal Committee says that the Committee has not received any report from the Grievance Redressal Officers on the communication of the Committee's decision to the students.
There was a delay on my part. Now I have communicated all : Prof Ajay Arora (Grievance Redressal Officer)
How many complaints were there? : Court
23: Arora
Gupta points out that there were more.
23+9+7 decisions were there: Grievance Redressal Committee
Right from day 1, there is unnecessary suspension: Dutta for DU
DU is acting like that : Court
Mr Arora is saying that he has forwarded all decisions: Dutta
I'll personally talk to GRC and clarify. Please give me a date: Arora
The Court did not say anything. Your senior counsel is saying that you will file an affidavit: Court
You unnecessarily took it to an aggresive level : Court to DU counsel
Suppose something is missing, I'm a teacher by profession, I'll take care of it: Arora
You are being fair: Court
Court starts dictating the order.
Court records the submissions made before it.
Court records that the second phase was OBE is going on smoothly.
In case any decisions have been missed out, the same will be taken care of. Mr Arora is given two days to communicate ..: Court records
Let a complete statement on the date-wise communication of decision of GRC to students be given a status report : Court
There are many undergraduate students who have applied for special results but have not received. Also, certain Indian Universities are pressing for final results: Adv Akash Sinha
This issue is likely to be dealt by the Division Bench: Senior Adv BB Gupta
I'll deal with it after DB then: Court
Court is informed about the development before Division Bench with respect to students who are going abroad.
Can we be informed as to who are these Indian Universities who are pressing for final results? : Adv Kurup for UGC
I'm not appearing for them: Sinha
Adv Sinha to communicate it to Adv Kurup: Court records in order.
A large number of issues were sorted due to the inputs from Mr BB Gupta, Kamal Gupta and the Chairperson as well as court: Dutta
OBE was possible because of large no of people cooperating. There is no need to be aggressive: Court
Court notes that submission of intervenor counsel that the issue of data protection and privacy issues are pending.
Payment to GRC Chairperson be released within three days: Court
Mater adjourned till October 12.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SupremeCourt to shortly deliver judgment on this significant issue
The court to hand down verdict in the suo motu case concerning visually impaired in judicial services
The genesis of the case lies in the rules governing judicial appointments in Madhya Pradesh which contained discriminatory language that prevented blind individuals from becoming judges.
This exclusion was challenged after a mother, whose visually impaired child aspired to the judiciary, wrote to the court, leading to a court-initiated public interest litigation.
Justice R Mahadevan: we have treated it as the most important case. We have touched upon constitutional framework also and institutional disability jurisprudence...
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear plea by Ranveer Allahabadia and Ashish Chanchlani in the case over remarks made in #indiasgotlatent show
Allahabadia and Chanchlani were protected from arrest in the last hearing
@BeerBicepsGuy
Dr Abhinav Chandrachud: We have moved an application. We are seeking lifting of one part of the order which refrained him from airing his shows etc. He has no sense of humour at all.. but he has 280 employees and it is his livelihood. It can be ordered that let no profane words be uttered.
SG: this is an isolated case. It is not vulgar but it is perverse. I saw the show also out of curiosity.. humour is one thing, vulgarity is one thing, and perversity is another level. Leave alone man and woman.. me and AG cannot see it together. The judges cannot see it together. Let him stay quiet for sometime .. Assam called him. He did not come.
Supreme Court to hear plea by Ranveer Allahabadia challenging multiple FIRs filed against him after he made certain remarks on India's Got Latent show
@BeerBicepsGuy #SupremeCourt #Indiasgotlatent
Dr Abhinav Chandrachud: Petitioner has got death threats.. 5 lakh reward for cutting his tongue. Former wrestler says he should not be spared in any party we meet him. All for a 10 second clip.
Are you defending the language used: Justice Surya Kant
Dr Chandrachud: As an officer of the court I am disgusted at the language used.
SC: so what are the parameters of obscenity and vulgarity. In the society which has some self evolved values and when we behave within those parameters we want to know what are the parameters of Indian society According to the petitioner.
Supreme Court hears the plea by Association of Democratic Reforms
CJI Sanjiv Khanna: what is this for ?
Adv Prashant Bhushan: we are Seeking that the procedure which ECI needs to adopt as per supreme Court judgment is in consonance with their standard operating protocol. What we want is that somebody should examine the software and the hardware of the EVMs in order to see if the software and hardware has any element of manipulation or not
CJI: Once votes are counted the paper trails are taken out or it's still there
Bhushan: they should maintain the paper trail
Sr Adv Devadatta Kamath: I appear for Sarva mitter. The entire data was wiped out. the evms on which polling was done should be tested.
CJI: to be done within seven days.. and the machine could be as per candidate choice and the burnt memory could be checked and verified.
Sr Adv Kamath: dummy units are checked not real ones. Here a fresh poll is being conducted and 40,000 being spent for verifying and checking each machine and the payment is to be by the candidate and then it's just a mock poll!
Supreme Court hears PIL by National Federation of Indian Women over the alleged increase in cases of Lynching and MobViolence, particularly by 'CowVigilantes'
Justice BR Gavai: Issue has already concluded. Can we revive that by way of another writ
Adv Nizamuddin Pasha: But the issue is when private individuals are given police powers to seize vehicles and nab people for cattle smuggling.. this is how police powers are given to private agencies. Attitude of state machinery needs to be looked at and see how brazen it is.. some kind of oversight from this court will help
Justice Gavai: You can challenge those notifications before the court
Pasha: It exists across states and is across spectrum
SG Tushar Mehta: I appear for the Union. If such things are happening it can be challenged
Pasha: 13 states follow this rule
Justice Gavai: is there are a direction in this case by us to all states .
SG: On Nov 6,2024, 6 states as selected by petitioner were asked to respond.
Pasha: and thereafter all states and UTs were made a part. Oct 28,2023, was the plea to implead all States and UTs . They have replied also
Should former AAP councillor Tahir Hussain granted interim bail in a case related to Delhi riots so that he may campaign for the upcoming Delhi Assembly polls as an All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) candidate?
#SupremeCourt to hear @AamAadmiParty @aimim_national
The case comes to a three-judge bench after Justice Pankaj Mithal ruled that bail should be denied and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah stated that bail should be granted #TahirHussain #DelhiElection2025
Hearing to commence at 10:30 am #SupremeCourtofIndia