Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 21, 2020 29 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Delhi High Court begins hearing petition concerning open book examination for DU final year students.

Matter listed before Single Judge Bench of Justice Prathiba Singh.

#DelhiUniversity #OBE
Justice Singh notes that it has received a status report from teh Grievance Redressal Committee.
I have given data on how many students appeared in the OBE. The data was recorded by the Division Bench of the Court: Adv M Rupal for DU.
This data is for the first data. It includes everything: Adv Rupal as he asks the Court to take a look at the DB order.
Why can't you file an affidavit: Court

I'll send the affidavit filed before the DB: Adv Rupal
OBE has been a big success. The participation in the first phase was as much as in normal examination: Senior Adv Sachin Dutta for DU
Even for the second phase, most students have opted for online mode: Dutta
Senior Dutta informs the Court about the arrangement for students who wish to go abroad for higher education.
For PG students who are going abroad, we will declare results give month itself: Dutta
Senior Adv BB Gupta says that the issue of remuneration of the Chairperson of the Grievance Redressal Committee is still persisting.
There is an Acting Registrar. On the letter head, particulars can be given : Rupal

I don't think there's a need to do this.. I'll give three days maximum: Court as it notes that there is an order to this effect.
Adv Kamal Gupta from the Grievance Redressal Committee says that the Committee has not received any report from the Grievance Redressal Officers on the communication of the Committee's decision to the students.
There was a delay on my part. Now I have communicated all : Prof Ajay Arora (Grievance Redressal Officer)
How many complaints were there? : Court

23: Arora

Gupta points out that there were more.
23+9+7 decisions were there: Grievance Redressal Committee

Right from day 1, there is unnecessary suspension: Dutta for DU

DU is acting like that : Court
Mr Arora is saying that he has forwarded all decisions: Dutta
I'll personally talk to GRC and clarify. Please give me a date: Arora

The Court did not say anything. Your senior counsel is saying that you will file an affidavit: Court

You unnecessarily took it to an aggresive level : Court to DU counsel
Suppose something is missing, I'm a teacher by profession, I'll take care of it: Arora

You are being fair: Court
Court starts dictating the order.

Court records the submissions made before it.
Court records that the second phase was OBE is going on smoothly.
In case any decisions have been missed out, the same will be taken care of. Mr Arora is given two days to communicate ..: Court records
Let a complete statement on the date-wise communication of decision of GRC to students be given a status report : Court
There are many undergraduate students who have applied for special results but have not received. Also, certain Indian Universities are pressing for final results: Adv Akash Sinha

This issue is likely to be dealt by the Division Bench: Senior Adv BB Gupta
I'll deal with it after DB then: Court

Court is informed about the development before Division Bench with respect to students who are going abroad.
Can we be informed as to who are these Indian Universities who are pressing for final results? : Adv Kurup for UGC

I'm not appearing for them: Sinha

Adv Sinha to communicate it to Adv Kurup: Court records in order.
A large number of issues were sorted due to the inputs from Mr BB Gupta, Kamal Gupta and the Chairperson as well as court: Dutta

OBE was possible because of large no of people cooperating. There is no need to be aggressive: Court
Court notes that submission of intervenor counsel that the issue of data protection and privacy issues are pending.
Payment to GRC Chairperson be released within three days: Court
Mater adjourned till October 12.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Jul 16
#SupremeCourt hears plea by BRS President and former Chief Minister K Chandrashekar Rao challenging the Telangana High Court's decision to dismiss his petition against a commission formed by the state government Image
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: Plain case of political vendetta. Every time the government changes there is a case against the former chief minister

CJI DY Chandrachud: we will clarify that by calling it judicial enquiry they cannot take it outside the scope of the commission @TSwithKCR
Rohatgi: you cannot fix responsibility in a fact finding commission. This was for approval of tariff ..there was a power crisis and thus state bought power from state of chhatisgarh and thus the PPA needed approval from Chhattisgarh state commission and Telangana state commission.
Read 16 tweets
Jul 15
#BREAKING

Supreme Court DISMISSES plea by Deputy CM of Karantaka DK Shivakumar to quash CBI's disproportionate assets case against him under provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

A bench of Justices Bela Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma heard the matter. Image
Trivedi J: How High Can stay the sanction order granted by government? This is unheard of.

Senior Adv Rohatagi (for Shivakumar): That is withdrawn already.

Trivedi J to State: That is different thing but how High Court can grant such order?
Senior Adv Rohatagi (for Shivakumar): We are on a new question, the ground is this court has held that if the predicate offence is only conspiracy, it cannot be a stand alone offence and it has to be added by some other offence as well. I am questioning the FIR lodged by CBI which is completely illegal. I am not on any part by ED. I am on the FIR dated 3.10.20 under PC Act by CBI. Section 17A which has come in 2018 requirement has not been fulfilled (referring to split verdict of Justice Trivedi and Justice Bopanna)

Trivedi J: We cannot quash the case on the basis of split verdict by this court.

Senior Adv Rohatagi: But one judge has ruled in our favor.

Trivedi J: So what, that cannot be the basis of quashing. No quashing at all.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 26
[Excise policy case]

CBI to produce Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal before Rouse Avenue Court and seek his custody.

Hearing likely to start at 10AM.

#ArvindKejriwal @CBIHeadquarters @AamAadmiParty @ArvindKejriwal Image
Kejriwal to be produced before Special Judge (PC Act) Amitabh Rawat shortly.
Arvind Kejriwal's wife Sunita Kejriwal reaches court.
Read 118 tweets
Jun 25
Delhi High Court to shortly pronounce its verdict on ED's plea seeking stay on bail granted to Arvind Kejriwal.

Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain will pronounce order at 2:30 PM.

#DelhiHighCourt #ArvindKejriwal @dir_ed @AamAadmiParty @ArvindKejriwal #Bail Image
Kejriwal was granted bail by the trial court on Thursday (June 20). The High Court put an interim stay on his bail the next day, after ED challenged the order.

On the same day, Justice Jain reserved his verdict on ED's stay application.

Read detailed story here:
barandbench.com/news/delhi-hig…
ED and AAP lawyers present in court.
Read 13 tweets
Jun 15
#Breaking

Delhi High Court orders removal of tweets by Congress leaders Ragini Nayak, Jairam Ramesh, and Pawan Khera alleging that journalist Rajat Sharma abused Nayak on live-television.

@RajatSharmaLive @NayakRagini @Jairam_Ramesh @Pawankhera Image
High Court holds that Congress leaders over-sensationalised the incident and did not remain truthful.
"It cannot be denied that the citizens have a right to freedom of Speech and expression but there was also a corresponding duty to remain truthful to the incident. The X posts berating the plaintiff are nothing but an oversensationalization and depiction of facts which are patently false," the court said.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 13
Supreme Court to hear batch of pleas seeking cancellation of NEET 2024

#SupremeCourt #NEET #NEET_परीक्षा #NeetUG24Controversy #neetexam2024 #neet #NEET_परीक्षा #NEET_परीक्षा_परिणाम Image
Matter before a Vacation Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta. Image
Adv Kanu Aggarwal for respondents : A decision has been taken to allay the fear of students.

#SupremeCourt #NEET #NEET_परीक्षा #NeetUG24Controversy #neetexam2024 #neet #NEET_परीक्षा #NEET_परीक्षा_परिणाम
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(