J Sai Deepak: Applicants seek to place befre this Hon’ble Court a Report titled “A Study on Contemporary Standards in Religious Reporting by Mass Media” prepared by @OpIndia_com which captures approx 100 instances of patently false reportage by media
J Sai Deepak: There are three issues have been submitted:
1. Question of Jurisdiction 2. What is Hate Speech 3. OpIndia report which tracks the contemporary landscape on the standards set by mass media in religious reporting
Justice Indu Malhotra enquire as to who has authored the Report and what are its contents
Mr. @jsaideepak submitted that Report has been prepared by Opindia and that its contents have been put together based on database maintained by Opindia on false religious reportage in media
Mr. @jsaideepak further submitted that the purpose of the Report is to ensure that the episodes of Sudarshan News TV must be assessed in light of the contemporary standards of religious reportage observed by mainstream media, instead of being examined in isolation
Justice Chandrachud says that all intervenors including the entities represented by Mr. @jsaideepak shall be heard after the parties are heard.
Mr @jsaideepak: You will also want to consider that there is a question of chilling effect of an order and what example does it state for future orders though it may be only for this series .. order of this Court will have a chilling effect.
Justice Chandrachud responding to @jsaideepak: We agree with you. we are concerned about balance between speech and dignity. Here the community is a large amorphous group and we can't ask them to approach civil remedy.
Justice Chandrachud has indicated tht first the Petitioner and Intervenors in support of the Petitioner will be heard, followed by the SG, and then Mr. @jsaideepak, Mr. Mukul Rohatgi and others on the other side will address Court
JNUSU students at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) staged a provocative protest march, organised by leftist and Marxist groups, ostensibly demanding implementation of UGC guidelines and enactment of the long-pending 'Rohith Act' in memory of Rohith Vemula.
The event, held at Sabarmati Dhaba on the JNU campus, saw participants burning an effigy symbolically representing "Brahmanism" amid a barrage of inflammatory slogans targeting Brahmins, the BJP, and the RSS.
As per sources, the slogans reportedly included:
"Brahman Murdabad"
"Rohit Ke Hatyaron ko ek dhakka aur do"
"Manuwad/Brahmanwad Jalega"
This display, peddled as anti-caste activism, quickly descended into open hate speech against an entire community, once again exposing the anti-Hindu and anti-Brahmin venom routinely amplified by radical left elements in taxpayer-funded campuses like JNU.
We spoke with Sunil Yadav, General Secretary of JNUSU. Some of his slogans like “Manuwad se azadi” and “Brahminwad se azadi” have also gone viral on social media. He said these slogans were raised on 26th January.
As India observes Somnath Swabhiman Parv, it may be recalled how Congress leader Rahul Gandhi identified as 'non-Hindu' during his visit to the temple in 2017
It was only after this incident that the Congress party attempted to pass off the Gandhi scion as 'Janeu Dhari Hindu'
(1/n)
The day was 29th November, 2017. Rahul Gandhi decided to go temple hopping ahead of the Gujarat elections.
He visited the famed Somnath temple along with Congress leader Ahmed Patel.
Rahul Gandhi's name was written in the special register for non-Hindus.
(2/n)
The Congress ecosystem initially tried to scapegoat Manoj Tyagi (the media coordinator of the party) at that time.
He was blamed for the so-called 'goof up'. It was claimed that he wrote Rahul Gandhi's name in the register for non-Hindus.
Tyagi had rubbished these claims and even challenged reporters to compare his handwriting with the one on the register.
Since in-house Islamic propagandists of The Wire are blind to historical facts, here is an indicative list of mosques that were built after destroying Hindu temples
(1/n)
For starters, Maulana Hakim Sayid Abdul Hai had this to say about the disputed structure 'Babri Masjid'
"This mosque was constructed by Babar at Ayodhya, which Hindus call the birthplace of Ramchanderji. There is a famous story about his wife, Sita. It is said that Sita had a temple here in which she lived and cooked food for her husband. On that very site, Babar constructed this mosque in H. 963."
(2/n)
In 1990, historian Sita Ram Goel, along with other authors published a 2-volume book named ‘Hindu Temples: What Happened To Them’.
Goel traced over 1,800 Muslim structures that were constructed over existing temples and/or using materials from destroyed temples.
Yesterday, urban naxals took to India Gate to protest against 'pollution,' but soon showed their true colours.
They not only glorified slain Maoist Madvi Hidma but also attacked the police with chilli spray.
Here is everything you need to know about them
(1/n)
Urban naxals in India are now weaponising climate change and environmental activism to promote left-wing extremism and undermine the nation’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Check out this glorification - 'Comrade Hidma amar rahein'
(2/n)
Two rabid leftist organisations were at the helm of this carefully crafted protest, meant to glorify Red terror while gaining mass support in the name of ‘pollution.’
Texas has designated CAIR a terror group, and this hits home for India because CAIR was linked to Rahul Gandhi’s 2023 Houston event. Its ties to Hamas and Al Qaeda are now formally flagged.
1/n
Greg Abbott placed CAIR alongside the Muslim Brotherhood, calling it part of a global Islamist movement rooted in armed jihad and a Caliphate enforcing Sharia law.
2/n
The proclamation cites federal probes, court findings and academic research showing CAIR’s structural links to Hamas. Even the FBI cut ties in 2008 and the Biden administration removed CAIR references in 2023.
From sympathisers in Delhi to Operation Kagar in Karegutta and encounters in Abujhmadh, the story of India’s final battle against Naxalism is unfolding. A thread on how the Red Terror is collapsing under the Modi govt’s push.
1/n
CPI General Secretary D Raja has openly backed the Naxal ‘ceasefire’ proposal. While Amit Shah rejected it, Raja even criticised the Naxal-Mukt Bharat slogan, echoing terrorist sympathies.
On 28th September, Home Minister Amit Shah flatly rejected the Maoist offer of a ceasefire. He urged Naxals to surrender and return to the mainstream, not dictate terms to the Indian state.