J Sai Deepak: Applicants seek to place befre this Hon’ble Court a Report titled “A Study on Contemporary Standards in Religious Reporting by Mass Media” prepared by @OpIndia_com which captures approx 100 instances of patently false reportage by media
J Sai Deepak: There are three issues have been submitted:
1. Question of Jurisdiction 2. What is Hate Speech 3. OpIndia report which tracks the contemporary landscape on the standards set by mass media in religious reporting
Justice Indu Malhotra enquire as to who has authored the Report and what are its contents
Mr. @jsaideepak submitted that Report has been prepared by Opindia and that its contents have been put together based on database maintained by Opindia on false religious reportage in media
Mr. @jsaideepak further submitted that the purpose of the Report is to ensure that the episodes of Sudarshan News TV must be assessed in light of the contemporary standards of religious reportage observed by mainstream media, instead of being examined in isolation
Justice Chandrachud says that all intervenors including the entities represented by Mr. @jsaideepak shall be heard after the parties are heard.
Mr @jsaideepak: You will also want to consider that there is a question of chilling effect of an order and what example does it state for future orders though it may be only for this series .. order of this Court will have a chilling effect.
Justice Chandrachud responding to @jsaideepak: We agree with you. we are concerned about balance between speech and dignity. Here the community is a large amorphous group and we can't ask them to approach civil remedy.
Justice Chandrachud has indicated tht first the Petitioner and Intervenors in support of the Petitioner will be heard, followed by the SG, and then Mr. @jsaideepak, Mr. Mukul Rohatgi and others on the other side will address Court
Since in-house Islamic propagandists of The Wire are blind to historical facts, here is an indicative list of mosques that were built after destroying Hindu temples
(1/n)
For starters, Maulana Hakim Sayid Abdul Hai had this to say about the disputed structure 'Babri Masjid'
"This mosque was constructed by Babar at Ayodhya, which Hindus call the birthplace of Ramchanderji. There is a famous story about his wife, Sita. It is said that Sita had a temple here in which she lived and cooked food for her husband. On that very site, Babar constructed this mosque in H. 963."
(2/n)
In 1990, historian Sita Ram Goel, along with other authors published a 2-volume book named ‘Hindu Temples: What Happened To Them’.
Goel traced over 1,800 Muslim structures that were constructed over existing temples and/or using materials from destroyed temples.
Yesterday, urban naxals took to India Gate to protest against 'pollution,' but soon showed their true colours.
They not only glorified slain Maoist Madvi Hidma but also attacked the police with chilli spray.
Here is everything you need to know about them
(1/n)
Urban naxals in India are now weaponising climate change and environmental activism to promote left-wing extremism and undermine the nation’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Check out this glorification - 'Comrade Hidma amar rahein'
(2/n)
Two rabid leftist organisations were at the helm of this carefully crafted protest, meant to glorify Red terror while gaining mass support in the name of ‘pollution.’
Texas has designated CAIR a terror group, and this hits home for India because CAIR was linked to Rahul Gandhi’s 2023 Houston event. Its ties to Hamas and Al Qaeda are now formally flagged.
1/n
Greg Abbott placed CAIR alongside the Muslim Brotherhood, calling it part of a global Islamist movement rooted in armed jihad and a Caliphate enforcing Sharia law.
2/n
The proclamation cites federal probes, court findings and academic research showing CAIR’s structural links to Hamas. Even the FBI cut ties in 2008 and the Biden administration removed CAIR references in 2023.
From sympathisers in Delhi to Operation Kagar in Karegutta and encounters in Abujhmadh, the story of India’s final battle against Naxalism is unfolding. A thread on how the Red Terror is collapsing under the Modi govt’s push.
1/n
CPI General Secretary D Raja has openly backed the Naxal ‘ceasefire’ proposal. While Amit Shah rejected it, Raja even criticised the Naxal-Mukt Bharat slogan, echoing terrorist sympathies.
On 28th September, Home Minister Amit Shah flatly rejected the Maoist offer of a ceasefire. He urged Naxals to surrender and return to the mainstream, not dictate terms to the Indian state.
As the SCO Summit 2025 comes to an end, we analyse how India has transformed its position from an observer to an active player under the leadership of PM Modi.
The Indian Prime Minister met with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese Premier Xi, and held bilateral talks amid the imposition of a 50% tariff on US imports from India.
(1/n)
PM Modi visited China for the first time in 7 years.
He demonstrated India's dedication to Eurasian
cooperation at a time when trade disputes and disruptions to global supply networks threaten the foundation of international alliances.
PM Modi's participation in the SCO Summit 2025 at Tianjin, China is thus significant.
(2/n)
The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) was founded in 2001.
For a large part of its existence, India was merely an 'observer.'
As expected, India's involvement with the SCO
was cautious and restricted.
The man in this picture is Peter Navarro. He is the senior counsellor for trade & manufacturing to Donald Trump.
For the past few days, he has been peddling lies to justify the 50% tariff imposition on US imports from India.
Here is a point-by-point rebuttal of his propaganda surrounding India's purchase of Russian oil.
(1/n)
Claim: Purchase of Russian oil is 'unfair trade' and 'financial lifeline' for Putin
Reality: There are no sanctions on Russian oil by the United States, G7 countries and the European Union (EU), unlike Iranian oil and Venezuelan oil.
Only a price cap was imposed on Russian oil and petroleum prices to prevent ‘war profiteering’ while not disrupting global supplies.
India thus did not violate any international norms through its purchase of Russian oil, as it adhered to the price cap.
Russia is both the second-largest crude oil producer and exporter in the world.
In the absence of India’s purchase of Russian oil, global crude oil prices could become $200 per barrel. This steep hike in fuel prices would affect all nations, not just India.
The Modi government’s decision helped keep global crude oil prices stable and balanced.
And this fact has been acknowledged by at least 3 US officials, including US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, Ambassador Eric Garcetti and diplomat Geoffrey Pyatt.
(2/n)
Claim: India uses US dollars to buy discounted Russian crude.
Reality: India purchases Russian crude oil from third countries, where transactions are carried out not in US dollars but other currencies like the United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED).
At the same time, the United States has never previously objected to the purchase of Russian oil by India, as it prevented crude oil prices from shooting up to $200 per barrel.
If the US wanted countries to stop purchasing Russian oil, it could have imposed sanctions on Russian crude oil like it did in cases of Venezuela and Iran.