"The truly bad stuff is in states like Pennsylvania... where you're talking about universal ballots just being mailed to everybody. OK? Can we just report this correctly to the people listening?" - @DanCrenshawTX to me.
Yes. The congressman was wrong. 1/
Pennsylvania is not universally mailing ballots to everybody. The state allows for *applications* to be sent to registered voters—something Crenshaw initially said he was OK with—but it does not send ballots unsolicited.
This was a repeated point of contention in our Q&A. 2/
There are states mailing out ballots, and states mailing out *applications* for ballots.
Crenshaw conflated these processes in our Q&A, and I'm trying to distinguish them.
He's right that Nevada is mailing ballots to all RVs. But Pennsylvania and 40 other states are not.
We have 9 states (CA, CO, HI, NV, NJ, OR, UT, VT, WA) plus D.C. that automatically mail ballots to registered voters.
Only one, Nevada, could broadly be considered a swing state. To be clear: It's not true that we're flooding battleground states w/ unsolicited ballots. 4/
At first, when I raised the subject of voters receiving *applications* for ballots, Crenshaw said:
"if you have to identify who you are, prove who you are, and request that absentee ballot, like we're doing in Texas, that's fine. I don't perceive a lot of problems with that"
5/
When I circled back—reminding him Trump had criticized mailing out *applications*—Crenshaw changed his tune
"We're critical... because it's totally unnecessary and it's an attempt to get us to this universal mail-in ballot, so we see it as an unnecessarily provocative idea"
6/
Crenshaw then cited PA re: "the truly bad stuff" where states send universal ballots
Again, that's not happening in PA
5 states (CO, HI, OR, UT, WA) do it every cycle
4 states (CA, NV, NJ, VT) have allowed b/c of Covid-19
Nobody is receiving ballots in other 41 w/out applying
We got into this b/c states that allow no-excuse-absentee voting will get historic numbers of absentee ballots
Some (MI/WI) can't count them until Election Day
I asked Crenshaw how we convince people that delays in calling a winner 11/3 aren't due to "rigging" against Trump
8/
He responded by calling expanded absentee voting "extremely dangerous" and said America is "playing with fire."
Crenshaw noted how his grocery store was packed. "Everybody can go vote. This is nonsense."
He also cited Dr. Fauci's assertion that in-person voting is safe.
9/
Crenshaw told me, "Journalists need to be more honest about this."
Everybody does.
With a patchwork of laws across states, it's critical to have our facts straight. Who's getting ballots, how, and where? What's the process for counting? How are they certified? Good Qs...
10/
Here are two clip-and-save links, to make sense of those rules
2) I used zero off-record details or quotes, as our FC team can attest
3) His trainer overheard portions of 1 interview
4) Licht is quoted extensively in a neutral context (sorry it wasn't positive enough for you/him)
5) In August 2022, Licht himself (not just Dornic) met with me over dinner. They knew I was pitching a profile, because...
6) When you propose to spend months and months reporting on someone—using them as a "case study" for larger trends—we journalists call that a "profile."
7) "Two sources," eh? Four people present. One, the trainer, was out of earshot (Licht grunted the remark directly to me.) The other, Dornic, didn't quite catch it, and I relayed the full quote to him afterward. And your piece says Licht didn't comment. So... who are the sources?
Numb. It's no exaggeration to call Blake a once-in-a-generation talent. The guy could do it all—write short and long, edit newsletters and mag cover stories, conceptualize features in the midst of a tweetstorm—and do it with excellence. But that's not what made him special. 1/
Six years ago, I had to tell my new boss something. I was dealing with sudden onset of panic disorder—ferocious, debilitating anxiety. Couldn't leave home. Couldn't make eye contact. Wasn't sure I could practice journalism at all. His response was something I'll never forget. 2/
"Want to compare notes?" he asked me.
So we did. My new boss, a dude I barely knew, became my mental-health confidante. We'd start every work-related conversation by trading stories about our respective struggles. I started to improve. And my new boss was a big reason why. 3/
Actually, let's use the 1/6 anniversary to smear the cowards who systematically deceived those millions of Trump voters. Their mistake was not invading the Capitol; it was believing these professional liars who were radicalizing them for personal/political gain.
If you want to understand the @CNN / @joerogan situation, think of the media as a clique-obsessed high school.
A brief thread:
Rogan is the stoner who does wild stuff, breaks all the rules with with few consequences, and hangs out with shady characters (and some straight-up criminals). Therefore most of us don’t want to be associated with him, even though a bunch of us secretly love to get high with him.
CNN is the pompous rich kid who lives in a bubble. He gets high, too, but rarely faces the kind of accountability he preaches for the stoner. That drives some of us crazy—but we tend not to say anything, because you’d rather stay on his good side. Plus, he throws awesome parties.
"I have on many occasions criticized the abuse of the word coup in our politics, but that is what this is: an attempted coup d’état under color of law. It would be entirely appropriate today to impeach Trump a second time and remove him from office before his term ends."
"Trump’s media cheerleaders, who like to call themselves constitutionalists & patriots, are no such thing. They are, for the most part, profiteers who will justify anything if it helps them to hold onto one point of audience share as they peddle their various blends of snake oil"
States administer elections in this country. States canvass. States certify. States appoint slates of electors to the EC.
Once those state results are certified, and EC votes cast, there is no federal role beyond Congress tallying them and the sitting VP announcing a winner.
This is very straightforward. Can members of Congress object to the count? Yes. But objections have historically been extremely rare and narrow in scope. They've also been ineffectual—because federal lawmakers wouldn't dare, with the stakes so high, usurp the will of the states.
This is what makes 2020 so special. The same folks who've screamed about federal overreach and #makeDClisten are now proposing Congress disenfranchise tens of millions of Americans and strip states of their electoral sovereignty.