EXCLUSIVE: Care homes were used as a "dumping ground" at the start of the pandemic, according to NHS whistleblowers we've spoken to.
Govt has always denied large numbers of patients were discharged from hospitals into homes without testing, but these men took up to 200 each.
Our 3 whistleblowers work in patient transport and claim many patients clearly had Covid symptoms.
"Some of them you could tell if they were sweating, if there was coughing. And when we'd get to the nursing homes they'd say 'Are they positive?' and we'd say 'I don't know'."
Data we've been leaked from an NHS trust one of our whistleblowers works for shows the percentage of discharges into homes doubled from mid-March to April.
"There was pressure to get them out...I have to look at it that they threw the elderly to one side."
When I put all this to the Health Sec he said discharging is one lesson "we've learnt".
But as I reported last week homes are being asked to take Covid patients again. Vital changes tho:
- They're now all tested
- No home *has* to take them
- PPE, infection control improved
This is the first time that NHS staff have spoken out to corroborate the stories we've heard from countless care homes during the pandemic.
Their testimony plays an important part in understanding what happened. Full report @itvnews at 10. And more here:
The Business Committee is hearing this morning from subpostmasters, their solicitors and key figures from govt/Post Office Limited and Fujitsu which designed Horizon.
The Post Office Minister Kevin Hollinrake is sitting listening to all of the evidence - he's up at 12.
Solicitor for many of the affected subpostmasters Neil Hudgell says just three people have so far been fully compensated for the scandal.
The committee are now hearing from former sub-postmasters Alan Bates and Jo Hamilton.
Bates says people are dying waiting for compensation. Hamilton says "a factory of bureaucracy" around applying for the money "makes you feel like a criminal all over again".
BREAKING: Rwanda government threatens to pull out of the deal if it does not adhere to international law.
Hugely problematic - and potentially humiliating - for govt if its partner country decides the deal is too toxic.
Statement below 👇
Part of the issue with the deal for judges in the Supreme Court is that Rwanda has been accused of breaking international agreements in the way it treats asylum seekers. Now Rwanda says the UK government's potential attitude to international law is a step too far.
Labour source:
“Open warfare over a failing scheme that is costing millions and won’t solve the problem anyway. All this money and time for a plan that can only remove around 100 people. Desperate stuff in the dying days of Rishi Sunak’s feeble government.”
BREAKING: The Supreme Court rules that the government’s policy to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda is UNLAWFUL.
Supreme Court unanimously decides that Rwanda might return asylum seekers to their country of origin before having their cases properly considered (breaking the principle of non-refoulement).
The Supreme Court was convinced by evidence from UNHCR that Rwanda had ‘refouled’ asylum seekers in the past.
For example, a similar agreement with Israel saw Rwanda secretly move asylum seekers to a neighbouring country where they could be sent back to their country of origin.
On 3rd March 2020 Dominic Cummings sent this message to others in No10 saying Boris Johnson "doesn't think it's a big deal" and that Covid will "be like swine flu".
"He thinks his main danger is talking economy into a slump." #CovidInquiry
We are hearing from Lee Cain, Director of Communications in No10 during the initial months of the pandemic.
He is asked about his statement in his written evidence that "the government had no plan" for a pandemic.
As pandemic takes hold, Dominic Cummings texts to say "CABOFF [cabinet office] is terrifyingly shit". 😳