@ODAV17@ihategetting@ace2blue@NewsNationNow Get your s**t straight. Her boyfriend was Kenneth Walker. Neither Breonna nor Walker had a h/o drug offenses. She lived with her sister, no boyfriend. The warrant was issued for Jamarcus Glover, her ex from 2 years before. He was 10 miles away at another home for which they also
@ODAV17@ihategetting@ace2blue@NewsNationNow 2)had a warrant, including an ADRIAN WALKER, who is not related to Kenneth. You people make me sick. You are so eager to blame this innocent, 26 y/o Black mother and EMS worker living her life above the law that you just make up shit. Absolutely disgusting you have such hatred.
@ODAV17@ihategetting@ace2blue@NewsNationNow 3)It is so f***ing easy for you to label Black people drug addicts that any lie is preferable to the actual truth. You ought to be ashamed of your disgusting self.
@Cigna doing what they do best. Denying s**t. 3 mo old baby in respiratory distress-s/p open heart surgery 2 months before. Baby gets intubated at local ED & doc makes decision to transfer to a higher level of care emergently & arranges for air ambulance. kffhealthnews.org/news/article/m…
2)Unsurprisingly, air ambulance is out-of-network. Mom and Dad get $97K bill. Cigna believes the pt could have gone by ground ambulance & whines that no records show that ground ambulance “would impede timely and appropriate medical care.” If a doc is transferring a patient
3)by air, it's f***ing emergent. We don't take that s**t lightly and we don't do it "routinely". We do it because it's necessary. Instead of having an actual EM Cigna doc talk to the doc so they can communicate the necessity of such a transfer, Cigna chose to deny the claim.
Appears the NP who didn't recognize shingles(from my earlier post) was advised, by crowdsourcing, that the patient has shingles. One would think that would be enough. Nope. Now she asks how to treat. She has no idea how Acyclovir is metabolized(hint: it's not the liver) or how
2)it's dosed. I will keep ridiculing this nonsense until dimwitted legislators stop enabling scope creep & nursing does something about it's trashy NP education. Improved access, but the quality of care sucks. No access is better than this s**t. midlevel.wtf/elite-np-would…
3)Why is it acceptable to "practice" this way on underserved/marginalized/disenfranchised populations? Let them go do this s**t on people in BelAir or the Hamptons for a change. See how that pans out legislators. I no longer redact names because the public needs to see it is not
This is what bulls**t looks like. Lip service to appear important-but no receipts so the public can understand. Contrary to popular belief, PA school is not med school on steroids. Allow me to interpret the BS. If one is REQUIRED to apply to a med school, there is no "IF".
2)"If" implies the individual either does not know what the f**k they are talking or they are straight up lying through their f**king teeth. In the scope creep issue, it is both. "Regardless" is equivalent to "Anyway"...with an attitude. And no receipts.
3)Allow me to demonstrate receipts. Can't use PA programs in the UK because they are raggedy. There are 306 PA programs in the U.S. All are accredited(unless they are on probation). Below is the didactic/clinical curriculums of Duke's 2 yr PA program.
What a move by the RCP. Totally antithetical to their core mission. Sellouts. PAs have been in the UK since 2005. Unregulated. Suddenly, regulation and prescribing rights are of the utmost importance. Let me say that as an EM doc, I have to be very familiar with pharmacology so
2)that I can intervene expeditiously in patients suffering from various toxidromes, in addition to "routine" medical management. Can't rush through learning that s**t. Ask a pharmacist. But a college that represents physicians is sanctioning expediting prescribing rights for a
3)"profession" with minimal pharmacology training. Like it's a piece of cake. I really don't understand why physicians endorse this s**t when they know full well it is not safe or in the best interest of the public. This is diabolic & reprehensible. Sigh...
Some of you may recall the NP in California who impersonated a doctor online and in-person by not clarifying that she was a NP-as required by state law(Nursing Act). $20,000 fine by the San Luis Obispo DA. She had an "independent" medical practice(NPPs
2)cannot own medical practices in CA), writing prescriptions for everything under the sun w/o a protocol in place(also a violation of the law) & only notional supervision. Her "supervising" doc worked in Massachusetts. Welp, the doc has been fined $25K for failing to supervise.
Listen, I have to get this s**t off my chest. Who the f**k actually believes it is acceptable to allow a so-called "health profession" to have access to patients, to do whatever the f**k they want, yet have no regulations or guidelines(so the public is not protected),
2)no CLEARLY defined scope of practice and NO LICENSE requirement?!! UK PAs, I'm looking at you👀. People, for the love of God, this is unethical as f**k. I cannot believe the commentary by physicians, who represent one of the most regulated, overly licensed & certified
3)professions in the f**king world, DEFENDING this s**t. I'm specifically speaking to the physicians who claim they have "trained" the PAs to be competent and provide high quality care. How the f**k is the public supposed to know that? Because you say so? There is no physician