Greg Siskind Profile picture
Sep 22, 2020 10 tweets 2 min read Read on X
The Department of Justice is proposing a regulation that will make it even harder to file for political asylum. Here’s my quick rundown of what the rule intends to do. 1
The rule applies to individuals who are in immigration proceedings in front of an immigration judge. The rule is getting a lot of criticism and I’ll retweet some of those in a bit. But here’s roughly what it does. 2
Adds a 15-day deadline from the date of the alien’s first hearing to file an application for asylum or withholding of removal if the person is in an asylum or withholding of removal process. Extensions for good cause are permitted. 3
Aliens would be permitted to amend or supplement the application later if a judge permits. 4
2.A Form I-589 if it does not include a response to each question, is unsigned, or lacks required supporting evidence described in the form and instructions. If a form is incomplete, the accrual of time for an employment authorization document does not begin. 5
The application will be deemed complete if the court doesn’t return it within 30 days. If it is returned as incomplete, applicants will have 30 days to resubmit or the application will be deemed abandoned. 6
Any required filing fee must be submitted at the time of filing. This is based on the implementation of the fee rule set to take effect in October 2020, but which is being challenged in the courts. 7
Immigration judges may submit evidence into the record and consider the evidence as long as the judge has provided a copy to both parties. 8
The proposed rule restricts continuances beyond 180 days. Applicants must show good cause. Judges are restricted in extending deadlines beyond 180 days. 9
@ReichlinMelnick has had some pretty good insights into why this rule will be so harsh.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Greg Siskind

Greg Siskind Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gsiskind

Oct 27, 2024
I have co-authored the J-1 Visa Guidebook published by LexisNexis which has been published in annual editions since the 1990s and is the main treatise on the subject. So I'm pretty familiar with the rules for J-1 visa holders including at the time Musk attended Stanford. The moment he dropped out and was no longer in good academic standing, he was out of J-1 status (e.g. illegal) and unauthorized to work. If he successfully transitioned to H-1B status, it was because he either left the country and reentered in that status or he lied to USCIS (then the INS) about his status. They didn't track J-1 students all that closely until after 9/11 when they created SEVIS. So it was a lot easier to get away with things. I have no idea if it was the former or the latter, but it doesn't look like Elon is claiming he was still attending Stanford when he got the H-1B and the emails published with the story certainly seem to show otherwise.Image
Musk would have needed to be engaged in a full course of study (at least 12 academic hours a semester) in order to qualify for work while being a J-1 student. And Stanford would have had to have approved the work. The Washington Post's reporting is that he was not a student anymore when he was working in his startup.
Image
Read 4 tweets
Apr 28, 2023
780K! We sued @USCIS 2 years ago to call out gaming of the H-1B lottery that's happening in the IT staffing industry where applicants are filing 10+ lottery applications by getting multiple employer sponsors. @USCIS told the judge they were addressing the problem. Crickets since. Image
@USCIS @USCIS says in today's notice that more than half of the applicants were multiple filers and that they may refer some people for investigation of fraud. BUT. uscis.gov/working-in-the…
Read 6 tweets
May 20, 2022
Yesterday, @USCISDirector Ur Jaddou noted that the agency was looking outside the box to find ways to make the immigration system run better. Here's one - scrap the advance parole requirement for adjustment applicants. It's not actually mandated by the statute. 1x
@USCISDirector The whole advance parole system is a creature of USCIS-created regulations based on the idea that people who depart the US while an adjustment application is pending have abandoned their applications. 2x
@USCISDirector Why does @USCIS make this assumption? Why would people who pay thousands of dollars have the intention of abandoning their cases just because they travel internationally? How about just deny the case if the person fails to show up for their interview. 3x
Read 7 tweets
Apr 8, 2022
Watching @USCISDirector answer questions at the @AILANational spring conference. Will report on anything newsy. 1
@USCISDirector @AILANational Starting out by noting agency's new mission statement. She's citing milestones.

1. Naturalization queue reduced 20% (natz cases are one area of decent performance). 2x
@USCISDirector @AILANational 2. Crime victim EAD improvements.

3. Maximizing visa usage this year (I'm still skeptical).

3x
Read 15 tweets
Feb 4, 2022
Important thread coming.

I’ve just learned from a very reliable lawyer of a disturbing incident involving a US Army soldier seeking to enter the US with humanitarian parole issued by USCIS (& stamped by State) who was entering the US to attend his naturalization interview. 1x
The soldier was flying from Qatar to Dallas (DFW). A CBP officer (I have his name but am not publishing it at this point) refused to honor the parole document, put him on a flight back to Qatar and seized his military ID. 2x
The officer accused him of being an “immigrant not in possession of an immigrant visa” and stamped “CANCELLED-DAL” in red letters all over the parole stamp. They also seized his Social Security card and Employment Authorization Document. 3x
Read 15 tweets
Feb 4, 2022
This Memphis woman is the victim here. This needs to be rectified immediately. Outrageous!

The Black woman sentenced to six years in prison over a voting error theguardian.com/us-news/2022/f…
And if you needed another reason to vote against prosecutor Amy Weirich, look no further. One more reason we need someone like @SteveMulroy901 in the job.
Here's the WREG report on this. wreg.com/news/local/act….
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(