I fully understand and empathize with the anger and anxiety over RGB's seat. It is righteous and totally justified anger. It's also a matter of right and wrong any preschooler would understand. So don't get me wrong or misunderstand what I'm saying.
Stop and think it through.
Here's the reality: There is no reason to believe that they republicans won't do everything in their power to fill the SCOTUS seat. The are going to do exactly that despite their previous promises and the lies and hypocrisy that will follow the forever.
For some it will be their last official act as senators because it will be the reason they lose. But they'll do it anyway because this is what they've worked towards for their lifetimes. They don't care about they lies. Some republican will even sacrifice their seats.
This what they believe in. They have shown us that this is the only thing they care about; the only thing they do. They have already shown us who they are and it's not the first time. It's it then time for us to actually believe them and take them at their word.
On the other hand, there is also no reason to believe that they senate democrats can or will be able to stop them because even if the house stops the process with impeachment, all the senate republicans have to do is take quick vote to not convict and it's over.
Getting our hopes up then is a fools errand because we are all fully aware of the mendacity, nefariousness and rottenness of the republicans. They haven shown any honor or integrity in decades. Why expect them to start now?
The important thing here is that the republicans know that they are going to be wiped out on November 3, even if Trump tries to delay the inevitable by dragging it to the courts.
Let's not get so distracted by the current albeit important SCOTUS fight and lose touch with the democrats' over all mission and goals.
Does that mean that the democrats shouldn't fight back over the seat? Of course they should fight.
But there is nothing the GOP and Trump would love more than to take our focus off 200,000 dead, almost 7 million infected, a destroyed economy and millions of kids not in school.
Meanwhile, they are still trying to eliminate Obamacare at moment we need it most.
And there are the many illegal acts for which Trump must still be held accountable.
Let's not blow the fight right in from of us because we are letting the republicans dictate our agenda and how we choose to vote.
Culture wars are largely being fought out on-line. Much of the bases for rightwing culture war artillery against the left are predicated on half-truths, whole lies, mythology, and conspiracies with the promotion of threats and violence all promoted as "truth."👇🏿
We know better, and so to the internet companies that permit it. Much, if not all of it, is easily, verifiably provable as false.👇🏿
That much of the false material and propaganda has permeated the internet should fall squarely on the shoulders of internet host sites that permit the spread of false information but take no responsibility for their outlets be used for nafarious purposes.👇🏿
Before a certain point in time not too long ago, the Gaza college protests were noisy, but peaceful. Each side was determined to be heard, and they had every right on an extremely thorny issue. Then the politicians got involved, and Elise Stefanik led the charge.
Stefanik propagandized the protest at the university largely because her fragile feelings were hurt at Harvard's actions to remove her from her board position because of her noxious, odious politics.
So, the protests were a perfect opportunity to strike back at what she apparently saw as insidious elitist academic institutions. With agitprop, conspiracies, lies, and libel she trashed 3 top universities and humiliated their leaders to satiate her own pernicious, ugly wet spot.
Saboteurs, instigators, chaos agents, infiltrators, agitators, disruptors, accelerators - call them whatever you want - aren't a new phenomenon. We saw them at peaceful protest from Mike Brown to George Floyd, at peaceful BLM protests across the country, and now at Gaza protests.
Wherever there's a peaceful protest like clockwork, the sh!tkickers show up. We know why politicians hyperventilate about them because they help to propel whatever political messages that are convenient or expedient at the moment or as political wedges.
The most insincere people to talk about violent protesters are politicians, because the politicians' first goal is to avoid the problem and point at the distraction while promoting their agenda. Their agenda is generally the opposite of solving the problem.
Frank Bruni is on with @NicolledWallace attempting to create nuance in the "both sides" argument that doesn't exist. It's BS. Republicans may not be all MAGA, but all MAGAs are republicans, and there are enough of them enough such that they keep things from getting done for all.
So the left attempting not to alienate them and making concessions to them on things wherein they will never compromise and never cooperate is simply foolish. It's also wghat republicans count on. Appeasing republicans isn't the goal. It never was, it never should be.
The reality is that we are in a desperate, internecine existential fight to save democracy. Either the republicans who still believe in good faith and cooperation will choose to work in common and help us, or they remain hostage to MAGA and we end them all.
Up until about 16-18 years ago, I watched Fox about as much as I watched CNN and MSNBC. It had a bit of an addicting quality because it felt a little like watching fight club. But by the time Obama ran for president, the subtle racism and lies started becoming front and center.
Suddenly, it wasn't subtle but over, direct, assaultive, and persistent. There was no coded language, cleverly cloaked rhetoric, or thinly veiled dogwhistles. It was as as if someone entered the room, flipped on the stereo switch, and turned the volume way past 10.
And while until then they pretended to extend an olive branch to people who look like me, at some point, someone in their infinite wisdom made a conscious decision to hack off any attempt at appealing to a wider audience like they were cutting a nuisance branch off a tree.
I know that we use the word "grift" a lot - and we should - because there are a lot of gnarly, nasty, greedy, self-interested grifting parasites attached to the government, most of whom are republicans. But sometimes I think we confuse '"grift" with "graft."
Grifting is unethical; Graft is illegal. Ivanka, Bannon, Candace Owens are grifters. They hustle government, political processes, voters, etc., for their own benefit in every way possible. But while the collect all of the crumbs and scraps off the floor, they make no decisions.
They're scavengers. But people like Mnuchin, Jared, Clarence Thomas, and every republicans in elected office commits some form of graft because they take bunches of cash and gifts in exchange for favors and influence because they were/are decisionmakers in their legal capacities.