Extradition September hearing Day 10 (12 incl Covid days)
On the video link waiting to cross to court room.
We will hear from both Defence & Prosecution medical experts over the next few days, as one of the arguments JA’s team will advance is that the extradition would be ..
“unjust and oppressive” due to his mental condition & high risk of suicide if he is extradited. This was taken into consideration in the refusal of extradition in the the case of Laurie Love.
Clearly findings will be contested & the judge will be asked to make a finding of fact.
In addition to challenging the basis of any diagnosis, the basis of any prediction of the impact of conditions in US prisons will also be significant.
The first witness, scheduled to take all day, is expected to be Prof of Neuropsychiatry at Kings College, Michael Kopelman for..
.. the Defence. He has visited JA in Belmarsh for numerous consultations.
He concludes JA presents a high suicide risk.
He also refers to a trauma specialist’s finding that JA has complex PTSD & another specialist who assessed JA’s cognitive decline in HMP Belmarsh.
All present, (incl Clair Dobbin for the Prosecution). Glimpse of JA, wearing a suit, demeanour tired. Judge in.
Kopelman in person in court. We see his back in the witness box. He prefers to stand because there is “a sort of chair here”.
Fitzgerald asks for the press to exercise discretion in reporting the personal matters.
2 report, one Dec 2019, severe depression with somatic symptoms - loss of sleep, weight loss, hallucinations, high risk of suicide.
13 Aug 2020 report on conditions in US prisons, improvements in Feb March to moderately depressed due to medication for hallucinations & moved out
of medical ward. I still consider the risk of suicide if it is decided he will be extradited... speaking about suicidal tendencies which he says would JA would find embarrassing to be revealed. Kopelman uses the Maudsley method.. JA has been to 37 schools.
Going over medication.
Effects of depression is a lessening of mental function - thinking, memorising, concentration which JA has complained of. (Personal family history I don’t feel I can report.)
(You will prob read about it in the MSM. Just the sort of thing they will be interested in. Hope I’m wrong.)
JA treated for depression while in the Embassy. He saw a psychotherapist in prison in addition to be put on medication. He has had somatic symptoms continuously while in prison. (I won’t go into the hallucination details, sorry).
JA talks about suicide. He also has an anxiety disorder picked up by a couple of doctors & PTSD. I suspected he had Aspergers but he also has warmth in his personal relationships so I had another opinion on that diagnosis. The imminence of extradition or actual extradition,
the risk of suicide would increase. Much more isolation he will be kept in the US. Quotes a US expert saying solitary is not recommended for people with depression. Suicide is 9 times as common in people with ASD but in his case the depression compounds this.
He would not be able to call family or anyone that might help him in detention in the US. There are an abundance of suicide risk factors. He has made suicide plans, begun writing letters to family and friends etc my prediction is he will deteriorate significantly
Refers to former warden’s report the doctor found helpful. He has taken a large amount of paracetamol on one occasion, “which does not surprise me..”
Lewis: refers to a couple of prosecution bundles, which K hasn’t seen at all before but wants to use his own bundle.
K says he his not a fan “ of those bloody books” in response to Lewis’ question about classification of mental disorders.
No I haven’t relied on those, I have made a clinical diagnosis.
Lewis: that’s the common standard.
K: I’ve served on committees that formulate this things & they are very political & vary in how good they are.
Lewis conducting a series of questions about how to describe mental disorders & their severity. (Oh dear, we shall all have to focus very hard here because I predict this cross examination won’t be riveting).
Lewis: episodes will last between 3 & 6 months & then recovery..
K: clinical judgement is critical.”DSM should not be used ... in a cook book fashion”
“By people with no clinical experience”
Lewis: asks him to close the book he is quoting/ reading from. K refuses.
K says I have the book, you just have a photocopy of certain pages.
Lewis: what’s the yardstick for your diagnosis?
K: my clinical assessment & the ISD (diagnostic guideline)
Lewis is insisting he closes the book & he refuses again
Lewis is going thru each classification & severity.
Lewis: sever with psychotic symptoms with hallucinations and delusions,
K: No. It’s not AND it’s OR. He doesn’t have delusions & you don’t need both.
Lewis: A person with psychotic depression is unable to function
K: yes he is like this some of the time, particularly last year, and as his lawyers have found him to be. He is not completely unable to function, but the issue is whether he has hallucinations or delusions & he has.
Lewis: you are a neuropsychiatrist.
K: yes but not only a neuropsychiatry.
Lewis wants to talk about neuropsychiatry. .. & JA had a normal MRI. K reminds Lewis he has given forensic psychiatry in a case they worked on together. He also says Lewis wanted his services for this case, so it’s a bit rich trying to discredit his credentials. (Defence mirth)
Discussion about spotting malingering. K says every time I go to see someone in a prison, I am aware they may be exaggerating. Lewis Quotes (paraphrases) Polonius “Though this be madness yet there be method in it”
K points to his experience & prison reports. Lewis asks him to name articles he has read on malingering... exaggerating. K starts referring to articles, Lewis cuts him off, K says the critical issue is I had this very much in my head (ie the poss of malingering)
Lewis wants to ask him about an article he has in the bundle.. K says I haven’t read every article.. I didn’t know I was coming here for an O level test.
Lewis insists they stick to his script.. starts reading page in bundle.. K says Are you saying I don’t have the expertise to diagnose psychosis?
This author says clinical skills alone are not sufficient to diagnose malingering, K deals with it- it’s often inconsistencies that
give malingering away, & this is important in neuropsychiatry as well.
None of the psychiatrists have challenged whether JA has had hallucinations. Lewis disagrees, K wants to elaborate, L refuses referring him to the opportunity when being re-examined
K: there are more people with hallucinations in prisons than in the community.
Lewis: close observation is key rather than consultations.
K: it’s not always possible to have close observation “ by the clinical team” - you are putting words in my mouth.
Lewis: discussing ACCTV in prison .. & relying on what JA tells K about an incident in prison, the result of which is JA was placed in solitary for 4 days. You rely solely on what he has told you.
K: yes but there are other factors & you are quoting out of context
K: I don’t know it’s true, or untrue, nor have I seen all the CCTV.
Glimpse of JA. Lewis wants to know what type of razor blade it was because the type used in prison is not dangerous. K says he didn’t question him on the nature of razor blade. Lewis: why wasn’t it in the
prison notes? K: I should have prefaced it by this is what JA told me. Not everything goes in the notes. He told the psychologist who looked into it - she discussed it with prison authorities & did not conclude it was not true.
Lewis: why didn’t you tell the authorities?
K: not
not my role & it was not that recent.
10 min break
Someone has gone to speak with Julian. Kopelman wears spectacles & looks to be in his late 60s or 70.
More discussion about items JA had concealed that were found by prison staff, as reported by JA. K: whether true or not, he has clinical depression & is suicidal.
Lewis: When JA arrived in Belmarsh he was screened for intellectual disability & assed for mental disorder but was uncooperative, he was placed on suicide watch (ACCT), JA tells K that he had Aspergers. K: it may not have been a diagnosis, many people have said it of him.
Lewis doesn’t know what ideation is.. rattles off a list of things checked that K included in his report of the medical records made when JA was taken to Belmarsh. Asks why K omitted in his notes that JA said he wanted to consult his lawyer about whether he would see a psychiatri
.. or that he reads the British medical journal. K well he reads New Scientist & other journals. Lewis: surely alarm bells should have rung about potential exaggeration. K: Joseph Farrell told me JA is a bit hypochondriacal & likes to read about his ailments.
Lewis questions him about things K has left another consultant psychiatrist. K: he did not develop a relationship with JA & I don’t agree with everything he concluded.
Lewis: Dr Daily reported on 17 April “mood good”. Why didn’t you report that? K quotes his record of other facts.. medication changes etc. Lewis goes through other notes by Dailey (sp?) where JA lists his concerns, which different to the things recorded by K. Why didn’t you
Record all the things that show he had “normal” concerns. K: my report could have been twice as long but I have chosen to report what I think was psychiatrically important.
K lists the things he discussed with JA, saying he doesn’t discuss self harm with everyone.
Lewis is going through the Daileys prison records (a man who is relaxed, thinking of his case etc) & comparing them with K’s records.
K: he has been more revealing to me, one other doc
doctor & one or two of the nursing staff.
Lewis: On the way to court “patient says he is fine, no concerns”. Why didn’t you include that?
K: a quick assessment on the way to court did not strike me as relevant. (Me:Gosh, who would believe that given what JA is facing).
Lewis: asking about the various times Dailey notes
“Not suicidal”.
K: I might as well have photocopied all the prison notes...?
Lewis: you might have changed your opinion.
K: that’s what you’re hoping.
Lewis: JA says in the notes please give more oranges than milk” Does that sound like someone not concerned about his health?
K: given he eats too little that’s a good thing, they would want to know that.
Lewis quoting “he denied having any thoughts of self harm”.
Would the fact he was going cold turkey because he came of codeine which he was on in the Embassy, explain his low mood?
K: No. and JA didn’t want to talk to prison staff about his suicidal thoughts because he was
concerned he would be put on suicide watch.
K: reminds Lewis all the observations he is reporting were made before K started seeing him.
Lewis says JA was observed to be happy, played pool.
K: once. He played pool once.
Lewis: inconsistent with someone who has severe depression.
K has answered this previously by saying sometimes people with depression engage in an activity & then just collapse.
K: JA was embarrassed about talking about some of the symptoms.
Lewis: you’ve already agreed that close observation by a team is crucial.
K: it’s not crucial, it’s important & the quality of those observations can vary.
Lewis: “polite, friendly, went to chapel”
K: that report is from the period before I saw him.
Questions continue along this line.
K: the reason he didn’t tell them about his hallucinations was embarrassment & concern for what it may mean for his placement.
K: I don’t believe he has delusions. In light of his experience in the Embassy, his concerns about our conversations being listened to were entirely rational.
Lewis challenging K about the dose (ie “the dose was for sleep rather than hallucinations”).
K: no you only give very high doses to someone with very severe symptoms.
Lewis: Dr Suelette Dreyfus - why did you rely on her for a confirmation of depression?
K: it was given from the perspective of someone other than his family who has known him for a long time. She corroborated what JA & others have told me.
Lewis: they became friends when hewas 23
when he split up with his partner & they co-wrote a book.
Lewis: her confirmation was of an episode of depression prior to when she met him.
Fitzgerald points out K says that in his report.
K: she saw later depressions & described his symptoms & though milder the symptoms overlapped.
Lewis: the only diagnosis of depression we have is from Prof Mullen in OZ in 1999
K: also in notes in hospital in Melbourne. I knew Mullen & discussed JA with him.
Lewis: “mild depress
Depression with no psychotic symptoms” pre Belmarsh. (Me: and pre Embassy & the rest).
K: depression was recurrent, I didn’t say the psychosis was recurrent.
Lewis: you say Dr Dreyfus said he would commit suicide if he is extradited to the US. But that’s not what she said, did she. She said “ he would attempt suicide” according to your contemporaneous notes.
Lewis: you have embellished it.
K: no, she was convinced & was tearful
Lewis: but that’s not in your contemporaneous notes.
Lewis: you have a telephone call to her in OZ.. after she visited JA in prison
K: no, she had been to London but it’s very difficult to get in to Belmarsh
Lewis: you asked her about the hallucinations which she said he had when he was most stressed. Why don’t you mention they are music - auditory hallucinations & not depressed but stressed.
K: she uses stressed & depressed interchangeably. K lists the auditory hallucinations - not
just musical.
Lunch
There is a long series of tweets in this thread where the statements are being interpreted by some as my statements. My fault. I got to a point where I forgot to type “K: “ at the beginning of each tweet. I would never make pronouncements about Aspergers - am not qualified.
But this is what happens when you are trying to keep up with what’s being said. I hope that clarifies things.
Lewis: turning now to Stella Morris
K: she asked me
Judge says listen to the Q
Lewis: did she tell you she was his current partner & mother of his children?
Yes
Why didn’t you put that in your report?
It wasn’t in the public domaine. It’s included in the second report.
Lewis: isn’t it relevant to whether he is a suicide risk?
K: yes
Lewis: the best protective factor
K: sometimes married people are more at risk
Lewis: Your duty to the court didn’t take first place over saving the couple embarrassment.
K: you would have known he had a partner
and two children.
K: maybe I didn’t perform my duty to the court, I was being diplomatic.
Lewis: “Ms Morris believed he would definitely commit suicide if..” in your report but that’s not what was in your contemporaneous notes “ believes he would definitely be a suicidal risk if he loses the case”
K: it’s not that different.
Lewis arguing he should have used her exact words, he says her meaning was clear to me.
Lewis: Morris told you she was not aware of hallucinations.
K: she usually visited him with the children, perhaps a reason he didn’t tell her. K admits it’s an error of omission.
Lewis & K discussing details about his older son & the reason he changed his name which K says was
not relevant & he wanted to respect his privacy.
Lewis: you relied upon Nils Melzer’s report which is neither balanced or accurate.
K: he took a psychiatrist with him
Lewis: quotes Melzer.. commenting on the Chief Magistrate having a conflict of interest & calling JA a narcissist, read from a pre typed judgement.
K: I agree this is a political document. I summarised it & put exclamation marks in my report but I’m not relying on it to make a
Psychiatric report.
Lewis Quoting Melzer on the role of Sweden, calling Melzer’s conclusions “nonsense”
K: I didn’t quote all that anyway, I quoted the relevant bits about psychiatry.
Lewis quoting Melzer on the concerted effort by the govts of US, Uk & Sweden etc etc (me:you know, that quote)
K: why are you cross examining me on material I haven’t quoted? You need to ask all this of Professors of political science. Look at what I quoted - all of psychiatric
relevance.
Lewis: you didn’t give context, that this is a biased report you are quoting from. Do you say it’s a balanced & accurate report?
K: not saying that about his political opinion but on the effects of long term confinement, yes.
Lewis arguing about K’s evaluation of JA’s cognitive assessment, putting to him JA has had not trouble paying attention to what happened in court.
K: it doesn’t mean his concentration & memory is as it should be.
Lewis quotes JA’s rhetorical slight of hand to the judge, his interjection, re the attack on his reputation, saying this proves he is competent mentally .
K: his slightly inappropriate interjection prob reflects his ASD
Lewis: do you think he is unable to engage with the legal process?
K: that doesn’t mean he is performing optimally
Now they are arguing about tests in malingering, K points out Lewis is wrong about the test.
Lewis: prison conditions now. . In your second report you quote other witnesses for the Defence.
K: yes, I’ve only recently received the Kromberg Declarations.
Lewis: why didn’t you ask for them earlier?
K: I was only made aware of them after reading the Defence witness reports
Lewis: you were aware there was a fierce disagreement on US prison conditions.
K: that will be argued by the relevant experts.
Lewis: you rely heavily for you opinion on these Defence experts in your report
Lewis: you say he is facing a potential life sentence.
K: I have taken part in other extradition proceedings & its remarkable how many US experts are prepared to say similar things about the US prison system.
Lewis: if the court finds in favour of Kromberg, you would have to
change your report.
K: it’s a matter for Kromberg to debate with experts who are testifying with opposing views.
K: those experts need to debate those issues rather that we psychiatrists.
Lewis: mental health problems didn’t prevent him for leaking US classified docs, running WikiLeaks as a global enterprise.
K: I have described a recurrence of depression, not while he was running WL but
his Aspergers would have affected the way he ran WL.
Lewis listing JA’s other achievements such as fronting a TV prog.
K: but I’m not saying he was depressed at the time.
Lewis quotes Kromberg on suicide protocols.
K: quotes others who disagree with Kromberg.
Lewis: why are you advocating a case?
Lewis wants the witness to admit that if Kromberg is right, his view of what would happen to JA & his mental health in the US would have to change.
Lewis: do you agree if the medical care is sufficient, your concerns disappear.
K: quotes other reports that describe a very different situation.
Lewis now arguing that the length of the sentence is in dispute & his opinion is based on life long sentence, sensory deprivation &
Isolation.
K: even if it were a shorter sentence, it will affect him adversely.
Lewis: what if he got 5 years, with no solitary.
K: this is all theoretical.
Judge wants to know if this would change his opinion
He doesn’t feel it is a fair question.
Lewis quoting Daly again. K says but he doesn’t have a good relationship with her.
K: I have said the depression had improved a little but the suicidal ideas & despair was still there. Sometimes when people get better, they suicide. I suspect his planning, preparations, will
result in suicide once he is extradited.
K: moving him out of isolation into a ward helped improved his situation at that time. Depression doesn’t usually lead to an outside referral, that is for schizophrenia.
10mins break while Lewis checks what the prison doctors say about that.
Glimpse of JA. Even at middle distance, with a mask on, you can see the expression in his eyes - he looks pained, sad, regretful. It can’t be easy having all this paraded in public, particularly after all else that has been said about him over the last 10 years.
I was just told “your call will be disconnected “
Waiting to see if that has happened to everyone on the video link
Yes, others too
They will try to reconnect us
We now see the court next door with 4 people visible, presumably journalists
And court officials
Oh, back in the right court
Lewis: I have no further questions.
So K was correct on that last point.
Fitzgerald now asking him about the main difference between his & the other psychiatric report.
K: Prof Mullen & I agree. Went went out to see JA together.
Characteristic depressive hallucinatory experiences consistent with depression.
Fitzgerald: re your recoding of the razor blade was uncorroborated.
What if it were corroborated.
Lewis: object, we don’t dispute that some form or razor was found. If it was a pure safety razor, it explains why it was not in the notes.
Fitzgerald: we are going to confirm the true situation.
Judge clarifies with F they will do that, but not today.
Fitzgerald: Lewis stated you left out in your report observations that there were improvements. Fitzgerald now lists all the instances in K’s report where K mentions improvements & does quote Dr Daly as opposed to leaving him out.
K: most of what I was asked about this morning was about JA before I started seeing him. When I started seeing him, he would asleep when I arrived because she didn’t sleep at night & he was in isolation in the medical ward.
Fitzgerald: lists the many times JA asked for the Samaritans’ phone in K’s report, comment about JA struggling in a single cell, sad & lacking in energy with impaired cognitive function.
K: JA was tearful, slept on the floor..
I phoned Dreyfus when I was in Australia about the depression because she had implied the depression was brief but dodging from their book it lasted about 6 months. I spoke to his mother, his father but Dr Mullen also recorded it in the
1990s in the context of a custody case.
Fitzgerald: there have been a number of depressive episodes.
K confirms reports of this.
Fitzgerald: is rational thinking inconsistent with depression?
K: No. I’d say he has severe depression with hallucinations rather than psychotic.
Fitzgerald: my learned friend said there is only one test for malingering. What would you say to that?
K: Nonsense
Fitzgerald: Lewis suggested your opinion is based on your knowledge of prison conditions in the US.
K: my opinion was not based on that
F: if he is extradited &
separated from his family..
K: plus his depression & anxiety, are enough to trigger a suicide attempt.
F: if he is detained in isolation, would that exacerbate the suicide risk.
K: yes
F: raises Laurie Love.
K refers to Epstein
F: refers to Manning suicide attempt
K: JA said if Manning did this just before a potential bail, you can imagine how bad conditions are. If extradited he would be in a permanent state of depression, in isolation.
F: you wanted to comment on suicide protocols.. can they prevent suicide?
K: no
K: all the experts think he will be in the Alexandria jail, under SAMs. Undertakings have been given in previous cases which have not been kept. If he receives a prolonged detention that will be detrimental. I wrote a report about indefinite detention, that it should not be legal
(That report was as an expert to the UK Parl’t, not to do with JA case).
He has finished.
Judge asks for a list for the witnesses. Lewis wants to read it out, the judge wants it electronically.
Fitzgerald: Daly tomorrow & Mullens in Australia in the afternoon
Summers reading a list of future witnesses.. audio not great.
Judge says she has received a one line request regarding the report for the press. Fitzgerald says the Defence would not support that. Judge asks which parts of the report they want withheld. Lewis says it’s complicated & the journalist would have to argue why it advances open
justice. Both Prosecution & Defence agree the medical reports should not be made available & they would have to argue the legal points which we would have to spend time researching.
Goodnight
In this thread, my own comments are generally in brackets.
Where I am reporting a lengthy delivery over numerous tweets, there are not quotation marks at the start of each tweet and use of the personal pronoun “I” refers to the person delivering the information ie the witness.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here is @SlezakPeter - academic and son of Holocaust survivors - powerful speech at the Sydney rally yesterday (1 of 3)
‘I’m among very many Jews, here and around the world to protest what Israel is doing in our name, and I’m proud to join you every week for over a year in solidarity with Palestinians.
I want to give a shout-out to those each week holding the banner “Jews Against the Occupation.” Our presence and our solidarity refute the smear that these rallies are antisemitic Jew-hate rallies. I know what antisemitism is and it's not here EVER at these rallies.
My mother survived the WW2 Nazi Auschwitz extermination camp, and she always asked why was the world silent? Why did they look away from the genocide of the Jews and do nothing? Today we know the answer as our government and media look away and do nothing for the Palestinians.
Well, in the last few days we have seen the landmark decision by the International Court of Justice – the ICC – an important victory for accountability:
The ICC has issued warrants for the arrest of two of Israel’s leaders – Prime Minister Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Gallant. Both are charged as perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Above all, the ICC arrest warrants confirm that those of us protesting here each week, and especially the university student encampments, were right all along.
The war crimes charged against Netanyahu include:
• Starvation of the civilian population of Gaza.
• depriving them medicine, fuel and electricity.
• military attacks against the civilian population.
• murder and other inhumane acts against the civilian population.
• blocking humanitarian aid.
• the destruction of the civilian population in Gaza – which is the very definition of genocide.
Australia as a member of the Rome Statute and ICC is legally under an obligation to arrest Netanyahu and Gallant if they arrive here. However, Australia is yet to confirm whether or not it will comply with arrest warrants issued for these indicted war criminals…
Cont
2/3 ‘The Weekend Australian newspaper (Nov 24, 2004) refers to the “silence by Foreign Minister Penny Wong” who is “pretending to sit on the fence”. And The ABC Headline says “Australia tip-toes around ICC decision” issuing only an opaque motherhood statements.
What is she waiting for?
Well, she is probably ambivalent because in March Albanese and Wong were also referred to the ICC for being complicit in the Gaza genocide in a claim co-signed by over 100 Australian lawyers.
Of course, Zionists in Australia are apoplectic and having a melt-down echoing Netanyahu’s excuses:
• Predictably, using the usual get-out-of-jail-free card, he called it an “anti-semitic decision.”
Even in Israel’s newspaper Ha’aretz the headline says:
"Netanyahu Brought the ICC Ruling on Himself and Now He's Whining About Antisemitism".
There is a great deal of deliberate, cynical confusion about this. Let me be clear: As the Jewish historian Norman Finkelstein has said, Israel is a rogue, lunatic state. It is not antisemitic to say Fuck Israel and Fuck Zionism: A guy was arrested on Bondi Beach for wearing this on his T-shirt.
• Netanyahu said “No war is more just than the war Israel has been waging in Gaza” because Israel’s destruction of Gaza is in SELF-DEFENCE !!!
This is DECEITFUL, DELUSIONAL BULLSHIT
In international law, it’s not actually OK to starve children to death for self-defence!!
We have all seen the pictures – mile after mile of residential cities reduced to rubble. What kind of sick mind can consider the complete destruction of Gaza as “self-defence” – targeting Hamas militants hiding behind human shields.
Since October 7 last year, Gaza has been transformed from the largest open-air prison in the world to the LARGEST MASS-GRAVE.
And the OTHER Albanese, the wonderful UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese, points out that Israel has no right to defend itself against resistance emanating from the territory it controls under occupation.
On the contrary, according to international law it is the people under occupation who have the right to resist, including the right to armed resistance.
Israel has dropped more bombs on Gaza than the Allied bombing in World War 2 on Dresden, Hamburg, and London combined! More bombs on Gaza in a week than the US dropped on Afghanistan in one year ...
In 1967 during the Vietnam War, American scholar Noam Chomsky said something relevant today:
“With no further information than this, a person who has not lost his senses must realize that the war is an overwhelming atrocity.”
The assault on Gaza is not a “war” but a cowardly act of terrorism by the most sophisticated military force against a defenceless population.
It’s important to recognize that the excessive, disproportionate military force against civilians – mass murder – is deliberate – it is official Israeli military policy. It’s actually called the DAHIYA DOCTRINE – GOOGLE IT!! ..
Cont
3 of 3
Doctors have been speaking out about the horrors they witnessed.
One American Doctor said “Every Day I was there I saw children shot in the head. That's not an accident. That's deliberate targeting of children for death. That's murder." SHAME.
Another doctor, British surgeon, Nizam Mamode, recently returned from Gaza, and testified in front of the UK Parliament. With tears, he barely could speak. He said that Israeli drones would pick off and shoot injured civilians, including children.
• Netanyahu says that “Hamas attacked us UNPROVOKED…”
But, of course, history didn’t begin on October 7th last year. GAZA has been under illegal, brutal BLOCKADE – since 2007.
In 2018 there was the peaceful protests of the Great March of Return in Gaza during which Israeli snipers killed or maimed hundreds of unarmed protesters, disabled people, nurses.
Australian Human Rights expert at the UN Chris Sidoti said: “Israel’s is one of the most criminal armies in the world” because “this is a period without precedent in a war that has been going for a century.”
= = =
After arrest warrants for Netanyahu & Gallant were issued, Israeli forces escalated mass killings of civilians in Gaza. At least 9 massacres were documented
• A day after, at least 90 Palestinians, including 36 children, were killed.
Of course, Penny Wong says that there is a need “to end the cycle of violence.”
What “cycle of violence”?
If Tel Aviv was reduced to rubble like Gaza City, Khan Yunis or Shujaiya, the world would stop the war immediately.
WEST BANK
We must not neglect immense tragedy of the occupied West Bank
Just since October 7, Israeli forces and settlers have killed OVER 700 people, including at least 167 children. More than 6,000 people have been injured.
There is NO HAMAS in the West Bank but for years, Israel has been killing on average two kids a week.
In July, Senator Penny Wong said that the Australian Government has imposed financial sanctions and travel bans on seven Israeli settlersfor their violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.
That’s PATHETIC!
The ENTIRE Israeli Government is a bunch of terrorists and extremist criminals – They are guilty of immense, obscene violence against Palestinians SINCE 1948.
In the West Bank, there are now over 700,000 Israeli settlers in vast cities all illegal according to international law …
Protected by the Israeli military, they are rampaging around uprooting millions of olive trees, destroying water wells and torching cars. Israel has demolished 60,000 Palestinian houses in the West Bank.
ICJ Ruling
On 19 July 2024 the ICJ reiterated the illegality of the entire Israel occupation of the West Bank and GAZA. The decision calls for dismantling of settlements and reparations.
The Court specifically said that states like Australia should not recognise Israel’s unlawful presence in occupied territory, nor should they render aid or assistance in maintaining it.
So far, Australia has done next to nothing
BDS
However, states must immediately suspend all investment, trade and scientific, technical and technological cooperation in these areas and engage in a systematic review of all economic, financial, academic, diplomatic and political ties with Israel.
We must recall our ambassador from Tel Aviv;
We must expel Israel’s ambassador from Australia;
FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA
Finally, it’s important for me to say something about our chant heard at rallies around the world – “From the River to the Sea …”
The APOLOGISTS for ISRAEL’s crimes – including Prime Minster Albanese - claim that this slogan is antisemitic or even a call for the annihilation of Israel.
But The charter of the governing Likud party says there will be no Palestinian state between the River Jordan and the Mediterranean Sea.
Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly, publicly rejected the possibility of a Palestinian State…
Woops, one more.. cont
In an effort to silence me the Zionist Federation have filed a complaint with the HRC for racial vilification, aided by a reporter who can’t do his own research.
Having first used the discredited Anti-Defamation League (they should be called the Anti-Free-Speech-for-anyone-we-do-not-agree-with-League), and the CEO of a company that trains IDF soldiers to become propagandists - to improve Israel’s image to the world (because the country is an apartheid state having stolen land, ‘mowed the lawn’ with gratuitous killing of Palestinians for decades, tortured detainees held often without charge, herded a couple of million people into a ghetto/open air prison, then launched a genocide), to attempt to frame me as a rape and Holocaust denier.
This because I have been sharing the reports of extremely highly regarded independent journalists who have written about the absence of credible evidence the claims of ‘systemic, widespread rape’ by Hamas on Oct 7. The Beheaded Babies, the 40 burnt babies, the genital mutilations, the systemic rape were all unsubstantiated or proven false. The Israelis claim the have footage and photos but the latest U.N. investigation made no finding of rape.
To be clear, I have never said there was No Rape. It is something I could never say - it would be a nonsense for anyone to make such a definitive statement.
Yet the double page story by Chip Le Grand makes no reference to a)my series of tweets about rape over a period of months that make clear I’m referring to systemic rape. The offending tweet is one where I put it would be counter to their mission to spend time on rape because they would jeopardise their mission which was to grab hostages and try to stay alive for long enough to escape. They would have to be pretty dumb to risk it. As it turns out, as I proffered, the latest U.N. investigation found no evidence that would allow them to conclude there had been rape. But Chip Le Grand reports none of this.
His story also took umbrage at my comment that we can’t know how many Israel deaths were caused by the IDF on Oct 7. Many independent commentators are now saying precisely that, including Gideon Levy. Even Piers Morgan can’t accept the Israelis know for a fact that a considerable number of Israelis were not killed on that day, because of the Hannibal Directive. And the. There is the indiscriminate nature of the shelling. There was more than ‘a kernel of truth’. ‘No car should make it back to Gaza’ means all the hostages being killed for a start.
At the risk of boring you, we now move on to The Sequel. 1/
Today I received another email from Chip, who is very well informed about what the Zionist lobby gets up to on a Sunday.
Good morning Mary.
Zionist Federation of Australia chief executive Alon Cassuto is today lodging a complaint against you with the Australian Human Rights Commission under Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act.
The complaint relates to your Twitter post from 4 January, when you reposted a link to a speech by Hezbollah secretary general Hassan Nasrallah, in which he told Jewish people living in Israel and the occupied territories:
"Here, it is going to be very difficult for you. If you want to be secure, if you want to feel secure, you have an American passport, go back to the United States. You have a British passport, go back to the UK. Here you don't have a future, from the river to the sea the land of Palestine is for the Palestinian people and the Palestinian people only.''
You prefaced the link to the speech with the comment: "The Israeli govt getting some of its own medicine. Israel has started something it can't finish with this genocide.''
Cassuto says that Nasrallah's speech calls for the ethnic cleansing of Jews from Israel and the occupied territories and alleges that, by sharing a link to it with your 30,000-odd Twitter followers, you disseminated hate speech against Israelis and Jewish people.
The ZFA says that through this and more than 100 other Twitter posts since October 7, you have misused your standing and profile as a highly respected former newsreader and face of our multicultural broadcaster, to share extreme propaganda and hateful material.
Could I please ask you:
Why did you share Nasrallah's speech?
Do you agree that material you have shared on Twitter since October 7 vilifies Israelis and Jewish people?
Is there any other comment you would like to make?
Thanks Mary. The ZFA announced earlier today they are holding a 2pm press conference to discuss this matter. I will publish a first take story at 2pm and would like to include your response.
Otherwise, I can update the story anytime before 5pm to include your comments.
I'll also give you a call.
Best regards,
Chip.
Chip Le Grand
Chief reporter
 2/ .. see my reply
As I was out with my grandchildren, I had not replied, so he called me and I responded but decided to put it in writing when I was free to do so:
‘As I said on the phone I believe it is important to know what both sides are saying in a conflict.
With regards to Israel inviting escalation by launching a genocide, I responded similarly when Israel retaliated against Hamas.
You might equally say if you were being briefed by Palestinians instead of Zionists Chip, was I intimating that Hamas or the Palestinian people deserved what they got in response.
The point is when one side acts in an extreme way, it invites retaliation. Sadly that is the case. (Cont.)
BREAKING:
#Assange Agrees to Plead Guilty in Exchange for Release, Ending Standoff With U.S.
NYTimes (thread)
‘..agreed to plead guilty on Monday to a single felony count of illegally disseminating national security material in exchange for his release from a British prison, ending his long and bitter standoff with the United States.
Mr. Assange, 52, was granted his request to appear before a federal judge at one of the more remote outposts of the federal judiciary, the courthouse in Saipan, the capital of the Northern Mariana Islands, according to a court filing made public late Monday. It was a fitting twist in the case against Mr. Assange, who doggedly opposed extradition to the U.S. mainland.’
The islands are a United States commonwealth in the middle of the Pacific Ocean
How the U.S. has fueled Israel's decades-long war on Palestinians - Rashid Khalidi, Los Angeles Times 🧵
‘Whoever the settlers were and wherever they came from, with whatever connections to the land, the resistance to them would have been essentially the same as that of the Irish, Algerians, Native Americans, Zulus or Libyans to intruders bent on expelling them and taking the land. Vladimir Jabotinsky, founder of the Revisionist Zionism that produced the Likud Party, stated bluntly: “Every native population in the world resists colonists.” And as Edward Said noted, it was the particular misfortune of the Palestinians to be the victims of victims’
‘This process of settler colonialism produced the dispossession of a large part of Palestine’s native population and the theft of their lands and property. This was achieved through the expulsion of 750,000 Palestinians during Israel’s establishment in 1948 (over 55% of the total Arab population of Palestine at the time), and of over 250,000 in 1967, with none of them allowed to return. This phased ethnic cleansing was essential in order to turn a majority-Arab country into a majority-Jewish state. It could not have been done in any other way, since it proved to be impossible to “spirit” the Palestinians “discreetly” out of the country, a desire that Theodor Herzl confided to his diary. For the last 56 years, these same practices of colonization and dispossession have proceeded inexorably in the occupied West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.’
‘The United States has regarded the military occupation of these territories and their gradual annexation and absorption into Israel with studied indifference for more than half a century. This contrasts glaringly with its muscular response to Russian occupation of part of Ukraine for a much shorter period. It is hard to give credence to U.S. claims about supporting self-determination and freedom for Ukraine while it has provided decades of essential support to Israel for its occupation of Arab territories’
In an article on the future of the US alliance in the Australian Journal of International Affairs, the Co-Chair of the Parliamentary Friends of the United States and of #AUKUS in the Parliament, Luke Gosling, says moving from ‘interoperability’ to ‘interchangeability’ as @… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
He cites a Loewy Poll that shows the majority of Australians support the alliance but Gosling worries that an even greater majority fear entanglement in a war. “Still, it’s heartening 76% of Australians believe the US would defend Australia..”.
The article goes on to say that to shore up support for AUKUS itself & address the concerns of sceptics, the US Studies Centre proposed an annual statement to parliament to define a positive vision of what the alliance stands for & Marles delivered the first, on the alliance and… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…