There are two major problems with presenting Corbyn’s foreign policy as progressive and popular. The first being that his foreign policy demonstrably wasn’t progressive, the second being that his foreign policy demonstrably wasn’t popular.
While Iraqi Yazidis were facing genocide on Mt Sinjar, Corbyn was busy opposing the air campaign that saved their lives. A campaign that was *overwhelmingly* supported by the electorate. No, Corbyn was never “demonised” over this, his supporters don’t even concede he was wrong.
You can disagree with me all you want, but the strength of the polling at the time, even to extend air strikes into Syria, is irrefutable. He got it wrong both morally and politically. You can't learn lessons in politics if you refuse to analyse the evidence in front of you.
Skripal and ISIS are major examples of where Corbyn got it wrong and the public noticed. Corbyn also denied mass graves in Kosovo and invited a member of the Assad regime to parliament to deny chemical weapons attacks. These are times he got it wrong & the public didn't notice.
The reality is that, outside of Hamas/Hezbollah/IRA, and some occasional lines about Venezuela, the mainstream press never bothered to really scrutinise Corbyn's foreign policy history. Far from demonisation, he got off lightly, which is an astonishing thing to say in context.
Here is Corbyn sitting down with the Assad regime's Mother Agnes, who was in London to deny her regime's responsibility for chemical weapons attacks. I never saw this asked about on Newsnight or on the front page of the Telegraph. It should have been. He got off lightly.
The incident above was important enough for Owen Jones to pull out of a Stop The War Coalition event in protest at her inclusion, yet was never important enough for a single question to be asked about it to either of them during his tenure as leader.
Honestly I spend too much of my time worrying about what the foreign policy platform of the country's main opposition party is, but I really have spent years dedicated to this topic, because I passionately believe in a progressive & human rights focused FP thecritic.co.uk/issues/april-2…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For context on how seismic Hezbollah’s decapitation is politically, from the perspective of most of the Middle East the Iranian “Resistance Axis”, of which Hezbollah is a critical component, has never “lost” a war, and have come out with some kind of victory in every conflict.
That image of invulnerability was bought and paid for mostly with Arab blood, with very little domestic impact on Iran, despite the vast sums it was pumping into its proxies in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen.
Hezbollah was the crown jewel of the IRGC network.
The battle-hardened, totally asymmetric domination Hezbollah had over not just Lebanon but the wider Levant region, has had its entire command and control structure from bottom to top systematically liquidated in the space of a week. The people enforcing the status quo are gone.
We know from Hezbollah themselves that these were 5000 devices on a secure network that had explosives hidden inside & bought by Hezbollah for their own operatives, and solely their own operatives.
Not civilians, active members of Hezbollah with pagers for secure communications.
By all means feel free to object to this attack on principle, but there’s no justification for pretending that these pagers were given to regular civilians going about their daily lives with no direct connection to Hezbollah’s secure military command infrastructure.
And again, by all means, object on principle, but don’t pretend that these pager explosions were big enough to cause large harm to civilians who were not directly in possession of a pager, the video shows the size of the detonation. You can’t fit much plastic into a pager
1. Be Conservative 2. Spend 14 years transferring money from the young & poor to the old & wealthy 3. Enact cruel policies, punish those without generational wealth 3. Destroy the country 4. Suffer the worst election defeat in 100 years 5. Meltdown when Labour end those policies
Do you think screaming at me about government cruelty towards retired landlords is going to work at all? I could barely afford to eat in my twenties and the government told me to suck it up and get on with it.
Please, keep screaming at me. I’m in hysterics, wiping the laughter tears from my cheeks, and I’m already imagining spending your nan’s cheque on youth services & a new bus route.
I can’t stress enough how cathartic this is.
You lost. You’ve got 5 more years of this. Sit down.
Seeing a lot of analysis about last night's events in the Middle East that I think misses the wood for the trees, so here are a few of my brief thoughts on the situation 🧵:
Firstly, immediately after October 7th I was very vocal about the fact that I did not think Israel's stated war aims were achievable, namely, 1) destruction of Hamas, 2) return of the hostages, and 3) permanent pacification of the Gaza Strip - I do not think that has changed.
I think it quickly became clear to the Netanyahu regime that these objectives were not realistic, and that over the course of the last few months, that strategy has pivoted to securing something he can sell to the Israeli public as a victory - focusing solely on the first aim.
I’ve survived a lot in my life, so it’s rare these days that I get too emotional over things, but receiving an email from one of my favourite musicians telling me how profoundly moved they were by my documentary has hit me right in the feels today.
It’s still hard to believe I’m now a director to be honest! I spent so much of my career producing content for other people I had almost given up the ambition to create things of my own.
Somehow I managed to climb that mountain, and I can’t wait to share it with you all.
We’re still looking for a distributor and dealing with a license issue, so no news on a digital release yet, but we’ve applied for about 30 film festivals in Europe and North America over the coming few months, so watch this space, we’ll likely be coming to a city near you soon!
Who is ready for @OwenJones84/@Guardian to be forced into a humiliating retraction over his latest piece? One that exposes how lazy he is as a "journalist", who is so committed to his own ideological bubble that he has published an egregious error. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
This is not a small mistake, but first I want to point out that this truly does reveal how little research he does, he badly read he is on foreign policy, national security and defence, and why he has no business writing on any of these topics. This is why he is bad at his job.
This is the paragraph in question. You will notice that unlike the words of Tony Blair, "House of Commons defence select committee concluded" has not been hyperlinked. Odd, given that this should be easy to find, the select committee is on the public record.