Thoughtful query here.

Remember the moving-your-tablets-to-the-night had magical 40% reduction in non-CV death?

Following a complaint to my institution I won't be commenting on that trial any more, pending its formal investigation.

Someone's taunting me into more trouble... Image
That's the curious thing about glifloziglozoflins. We don't properly understand how they work. They were never intended to be a HF med in the first place. They were for urinating out glucose.

And they are an actual drug, not just rearranging your existing drugs around the clock
But I won't harass DAPA-HF, for two reasons.

They do have the result you mention, roughly the same hazard ratio for CV death and all deaths: Image
Reason 1 I won't harass them.

In HF, most of the deaths are cardiovascular, because it is a very mortal condition - unlike another condition which for now I won't be mentioning. Suffice it to say the characters may be ORYIEHPSNTN. Image
Therefore you can calculate the number of non-cardiovascular deaths in each arm.

Non CV deaths in dapaglzinfoliznaplzn arm?
Non CV deaths in placebo arm?
Calculate the difference. No calculators allowed. (I am watching.)

And that is what proportion of the placebo arm non-CV deaths?
So the hazard ratio is ROUGHLY* what?

(* = yes I know this is a cheeky shorthand way to estimate it and it is not really correct, but it is close enough)
Yeh, well that's the kind of deviation from 1.0 that can easily happen by chance with that total number of non-CV deaths.

Obviously we should test it properly via the hazard ratio, but by eye you can see it is within the play of chance.
That's the first (and minor) reason I am not harassing the DAPA-HF people.

The far more important reason is shown here. Image
John McMurray.

If you mess with him, you don't get a lawyer's letter.

You get a knock on the door.

So DAPA-HF - fine by me!
What the hell is the matter with you people.

You clearly know how how to subtract (virtually everyone got the first two questions right).

But division, seems to be beyond you. Image
I go to the shop, to buy a toilet roll.

"That will be $56 please," says the shopkeeper.

"?"

"Well, the second wave is coming, so ... supply and demand, y'know."
Luckily I think quickly.

I had placed the toilet roll on one end of the counter. Image
All I needed to do was roll the toilet paper to the other end of the counter, like this. Image
"Errrr... what's the point of that?" the shopkeeper asks.

"Well, you know how you can rearrange BP tablets to almost bring cancer to a halt, yeh?"
"Oh yes, we all do that, down our way. Been doing it for ages. No cancer for centuries in our town. I am 145 years old, myself. I call my wife a childsnatcher, because she is 237."
"Good! So you understand the principle. I'm just doing it in space, rather than time. Roll the toilet roll from one end of the counter to the other, and it is a completely different financial effect."

"Ummm.... OK. Well I can't argue with you can I?"
"No, you have to wait for the enquiry. For now you have to take it as true. If you want to argue, you have to go to court."

"All right then, how about $49, just to get you out of my shop?"

"Sold!"
I have had $7 chopped off a $56 toilet roll.

What fraction of the original cost has he removed?
Is that
If you are super clever you might know exactly what percentage it is, but the above question should be easy to get right.

OK, so what percentage reduction is that 1/8 reduction?
By the way, useful facts to know:

1/8 = 12.5% (because you already know that 1/4 = 25%)

And

1/12 = 8 and a bit percent. Notice the 8 & 12 are the other way round.

Behind all of these excitement, is the fact that 12 * 8 = 96, i.e. almost 100
So if you have had 12.5% chopped off your price, or your non-CV death rate, how many % have you got left? (you started with 100%).
First five votes are getting the 1/8 correct, now, which is great to see.

Let's have no more of this humiliation please!

(Otherwise I will phone up your government and tell them that I've written a paper showing Covid gives everyone heart cancer, quickly lock down)

Good night. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof Darrel Francis ☺ Mk CardioFellows Great Again

Prof Darrel Francis ☺ Mk CardioFellows Great Again Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfDFrancis

Jun 9, 2022
How exciting !
I might have an Omicron !
Hmmmm...

Now this sounds a bit unlikely.

Boris johnson gonna come to my office and sit on me, will he?
Read 11 tweets
Mar 28, 2022
The pandemic has made it really clear to me that trend to have patients make their own health care decisions with advice from us, is well intentioned but harmful.

A great many people *don't realise* they have no idea how to decide wisely.
This unfortunate citizen thinks that this graph is what they should use to decide whether to have a vaccine.

the doctor has a choice of explaining about RCTs versus irrelevant 3d colour graphs, telescoping into a few minutes what it took years to grasp, or just sigh and move on.
When I get on a plane, I have paid for a pilot to have spent a very long time studying how best to fly a plane.

Even if I prefer him to fly lower so I "get less x-rays", or over the land "so I don't have a risk of drowning", I don't barge in and tweak the steering wheel myself.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 16, 2022
Which is more?
Which is a bigger discount?
Why are both of those questions obviously stupid and pointless?
Read 10 tweets
Jan 11, 2022
Businesses are financially incentivising vaccination by reducing sick pay for people insisting on not participating in community vaccination.
Some people advocate personal freedom with no responsibility to the community which makes it possible to live our lives so freely.

I personally think I drive best when drunk as a skunk.

Why should anyone tell me what I do with my body?
Ah wait. Obviously if I am legally proven to run over that kid with a pint of vodka in my blood, I should perhaps get a slap on the wrist.

But what if I have not collided with anyone?

Is that OK?
Read 24 tweets
Jan 9, 2022
Lots of people seem to be tweeting at me super-confidently that "Vaccines don't work".

Funnily enough, none of the people who go through any of my courses in clinical research stats are so overconfident in their interpretation. Image
Mop up any seminars on probability and risk that you haven't already done,

and if you've done them all, repeat the low-scoring ones aiming for the "gold" 100% status!

8-)

tweetorials.inspirion.org/h2/c48ed511bc7…
Absolutely brilliant example! Image
Read 54 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(