Alan Kay suggests that good inventors are like Michelangelo, both imagining the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel—and also spending years on their back painting it! Part visionary, part obsessive craftsperson.
I wonder about auteurs in film—hundreds of staff doing detail work!
Maybe one principle is that it’s possible to (partially) delegate to someone else who is themselves Michelangelo-like in that way.
Like: maybe Wes Anderson’s set dressers are just as visionary and obsessive as he is, so he can let them do some of the “painting”?
Likewise in games: maybe an auteur-like direct can “outsource” only to a level designer who will themselves bring auteur-like sensibilities—and not to a “technician”? @Jonathan_Blow suggests experiences along these lines in his comments about The Witness’s team.
I wonder if the important element is not so much whether he painted it single-handedly as much as that he was up there, on his back, “with candle wax dripping into his eye” for four years alongside maybe-assistants. That’s not delegation!
Some notes on @thesundaylight, a sort of… artificial skylight?
It feels good to spend the day in daylight. But that doesn’t happen when I’m working inside. Especially in the winter. So, for years, I’ve used super-bright LEDs while I work. They quite noticeably improve my energy and mood.
The main problem is that existing ultra-bright lights aren't great for home use. Options include: 1. industrial lamps (ugly, poor CRI) 2. 20+ high-CRI bulbs 3. film lighting (huge, often have fans)
All these will make your space feel like a warehouse unless you add bulky soft boxes .
Sunday's approach: it shines a very bright light *up*, at a large circular diffuser, which casts the light into the room.
The diffuser has a coating which really does make it feel like the sky: it's vivid blue, and the spotlight's manipulated reflection looks like the sun.
The Diamond Age's "Primer" has long been edtech's most canonical shared vision. I feel the field is haunted by it. It's wrong in many important ways—but we haven't articulated a better one, so we cling to it. I want to transcend it.
The vision has been so sticky because there's a *lot* that's right about it. In particular, the emphasis on immersion, responsiveness, a sense of assurance, and the emotional experience. andymatuschak.org/primer/
But the concept is foundationally flawed.
Principally, its authoritarianism: the Primer has an agenda of its own; Nell isn't told what it is; the Primer is not interested in Nell's goals or values. It's supposed to develop subversives, but Nell spends her life trapped in a box.
U Chicago offers a four-year discussion based course on “The Great Books”, available online to anyone. I just finished year one, and I’d definitely recommend it! graham.uchicago.edu/programs-cours…
Some notes:
It’s really remarkable how much well facilitated discussion improves my understanding. Well-facilitated conversation would often show me quite forcibly how shallowly I’d grasped the text. Others’ understandings were almost always different in interesting and enriching ways.
At least in my sections, the other students were mostly older or retired professionals (lawyers, teachers, managers, etc). My ordinary life isn’t really full of conversation with these folks, and I really enjoyed exposure to perspectives I wouldn’t be getting otherwise.
I'm not sure if I'm part of the intended audience for Anthropic's safety statement, but unfortunately it left me more uneasy than before I'd read it.
Conspicuous in its absence: discussion of incentives. Particularly in light of the rumored $5b raise. (con't)
Incentives are a big problem here! The founders, funders, ICs, alumni… the org-as-entity itself. In every case, these entities will face enormous net incentives to accelerate. If the claim is that they’ll *not* do this, despite that, then that claim needs extended justification.
What exactly are the terms necessary to raise $5b in venture funding, and then to make technical alignment the top priority?
Anthropic's career page notes: "We offer competitive compensation with significant amounts of equity." How should employees contend with equity vs. acc?
Given the recent surge of interest in AI for education and evocations of The Young Lady's Illustrated Primer, it's fun to ask: what are we to make of the Han girls raised by the Primer becoming the Mouse Army, rather than individualistic subversives like Nell?
One explanation is given by Dr. X: "We lacked the resources to raise them individually, and so we raised them with books. But the only proper way to raise a child is within a family. The Master could have told us as much, had we listened to his words."
In this view, the Han girls turned out differently because they had an AI raising them instead of a ractor like Miranda; and they lacked supportive influences like Harv, the Constable, and Miss Matheson’s Academy.
But another read is that the Han girls were actively sabotaged.
My sight reading practice has been totally transformed by Sheet Music Direct’s subscription service. It’s all-you-can-eat sheet music, a nice addition to IMSLP for modern stuff. Most songs have “easy” arrangements ~around my sight reading level. Tons of new music every night!
Also nice to use it in conjunction with RCM’s popular selections list, since it’s helpfully broken into fine-grained grades. Can usually read laterally within any of the volumes mentioned, in addition to the specific pieces. rcmusic-kentico-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/rcm/media/main…
I’ve noticed that if I sight-read an “easy” arrangement of a piece, I can often sight-read some of the “real” arrangement afterwards—a bit of scaffolding… I guess it gets the basic harmonic structure in my head.