Andy Matuschak Profile picture
Sep 22, 2020 4 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Alan Kay suggests that good inventors are like Michelangelo, both imagining the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel—and also spending years on their back painting it! Part visionary, part obsessive craftsperson.

I wonder about auteurs in film—hundreds of staff doing detail work!
Maybe one principle is that it’s possible to (partially) delegate to someone else who is themselves Michelangelo-like in that way.

Like: maybe Wes Anderson’s set dressers are just as visionary and obsessive as he is, so he can let them do some of the “painting”?
Likewise in games: maybe an auteur-like direct can “outsource” only to a level designer who will themselves bring auteur-like sensibilities—and not to a “technician”? @Jonathan_Blow suggests experiences along these lines in his comments about The Witness’s team.
I wonder if the important element is not so much whether he painted it single-handedly as much as that he was up there, on his back, “with candle wax dripping into his eye” for four years alongside maybe-assistants. That’s not delegation!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andy Matuschak

Andy Matuschak Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @andy_matuschak

May 26, 2023
U Chicago offers a four-year discussion based course on “The Great Books”, available online to anyone. I just finished year one, and I’d definitely recommend it! graham.uchicago.edu/programs-cours…

Some notes: ImageImage
It’s really remarkable how much well facilitated discussion improves my understanding. Well-facilitated conversation would often show me quite forcibly how shallowly I’d grasped the text. Others’ understandings were almost always different in interesting and enriching ways.
At least in my sections, the other students were mostly older or retired professionals (lawyers, teachers, managers, etc). My ordinary life isn’t really full of conversation with these folks, and I really enjoyed exposure to perspectives I wouldn’t be getting otherwise.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 7, 2023
I'm not sure if I'm part of the intended audience for Anthropic's safety statement, but unfortunately it left me more uneasy than before I'd read it.

Conspicuous in its absence: discussion of incentives. Particularly in light of the rumored $5b raise. (con't)
Incentives are a big problem here! The founders, funders, ICs, alumni… the org-as-entity itself. In every case, these entities will face enormous net incentives to accelerate. If the claim is that they’ll *not* do this, despite that, then that claim needs extended justification.
What exactly are the terms necessary to raise $5b in venture funding, and then to make technical alignment the top priority?

Anthropic's career page notes: "We offer competitive compensation with significant amounts of equity." How should employees contend with equity vs. acc?
Read 7 tweets
Mar 7, 2023
Given the recent surge of interest in AI for education and evocations of The Young Lady's Illustrated Primer, it's fun to ask: what are we to make of the Han girls raised by the Primer becoming the Mouse Army, rather than individualistic subversives like Nell?
One explanation is given by Dr. X: "We lacked the resources to raise them individually, and so we raised them with books. But the only proper way to raise a child is within a family. The Master could have told us as much, had we listened to his words."
In this view, the Han girls turned out differently because they had an AI raising them instead of a ractor like Miranda; and they lacked supportive influences like Harv, the Constable, and Miss Matheson’s Academy.

But another read is that the Han girls were actively sabotaged.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 24, 2023
My sight reading practice has been totally transformed by Sheet Music Direct’s subscription service. It’s all-you-can-eat sheet music, a nice addition to IMSLP for modern stuff. Most songs have “easy” arrangements ~around my sight reading level. Tons of new music every night!
Also nice to use it in conjunction with RCM’s popular selections list, since it’s helpfully broken into fine-grained grades. Can usually read laterally within any of the volumes mentioned, in addition to the specific pieces. rcmusic-kentico-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/rcm/media/main…
I’ve noticed that if I sight-read an “easy” arrangement of a piece, I can often sight-read some of the “real” arrangement afterwards—a bit of scaffolding… I guess it gets the basic harmonic structure in my head.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 2, 2023
My intuition as an Anki user was that its defaults treat lapses much too aggressively, completely resetting the interval. Years ago, I set it to scale the interval down by ~40% instead.

Some recent long-interval lapses made me curious. Looks like I was wrong. Image
Assuming we want to maintain a retrievability of 85-90%, 1 day really is the appropriate next interval (in aggregate).

For a few recent lapses: I forgot after 4 months; they came up again after 2 months; I forgot again. Not great to find that out after such a long interval.
That said, it's worth noticing just how strongly this conflicts with my emotional experience as a user, though. In many cases, resetting the interval really did feel punitive and unnecessary, Those annoying cases are especially salient.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 18, 2022
An analogy to Gall’s law in design: if you want a transformatively powerful environment that applies in many contexts for many people, you probably need to evolve it from an environment which had truly transformative power in some narrow context.
A system which seems only modestly powerful—no matter how broadly applicable—probably can’t be evolved in-place into something transformative. The primitive abstraction will need to change. Easier to do that with a highly focused context, much harder if you’ve prematurely scaled.
Pervasive norms in the tech industry seem to oppose this principle. If you’ve got something that shows promise in some narrow context, the strong cultural impulse is to scale that to as many people/contexts as possible.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(