Of the 64 museum security incidents in the past year reported in the annual review of museum security issues during @ProtectMuseums#NCCPP2020, only two had political motivations.
In one of these, involving damage to a museum near the Wisconsin statehouse during a BLM protest, it seems like the museum itself wasn't a target (the damage focused on the street front gift shop).
The other was Mwazulu Diyabanza's protest, attempting to remove an artifact from the Quai Branly Museum: nytimes.com/2020/09/21/art… Actually, he did this at two other museums in the last year, so the survey was undercounting: nltimes.nl/2020/09/11/act…
Even with these added incidents, it is striking to me that in a year of protests in the public space about art, there have been so few security reports about protests inside museums. Is that because protests have generally proceeded without incident, or are they not happening?
By contrast, a common type of museum theft last year was not motivated by the artistic quality of what was stolen, but the value of its raw material, like diamonds or the, at current prices, $4 million worth of gold in Maurizio Cattelan's "America": npr.org/2019/09/14/760…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 2021, a Nepali monastery told the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts that the museum possessed a sacred painting stolen from the monastery in 1967. The museum responded by offering to give the monastery a replica... if they would sign away their rights to the original. A 🧵
In August 1967, the American scholar Mary Slusser photographed the painting during an annual festival at the Yempi Mahavihara (also known as I Baha) in Patan, Nepal. In September, , as her diary shows, a dealer offered it to her.
In Nepal's Buddhist communities, sacred artifacts like the painting are owned jointly by their worshippers. They cannot be sold. Slusser's other writings show she knew this, and knew that it was against Nepal's law to export such artifacts. Still, she bought it.
Arguing that tales of dragons are evidence that dinosaurs lived in human times - humm. Arguing that anything Herodotus says was literal truth - nope. (Nice buff H-man, there, though.)
“by funding scientific studies on Native American human remains… federal agencies have created incentives for institutions to hold on to ancestors in ways that undermine the goals of NAGPRA…”
It’s not that they didn’t think about consulting tribes - it’s that they thought doing so was a bad idea for their research. Holy moly.
Inscriptions friends... is pecking out a circular letter form instead of carving freehand weird for ca. 530 BCE? (Context in next tweet.)
So, John Marshall buys this stele in fragments from 1902-1913: metmuseum.org/art/collection…. Marshall was offering £10 a letter for further fragments of the inscription, or £500 for the rest of it.
In 1907, here's the part of the inscription he has (left) and two more parts he's offered by a dealer in Athens (right). The new parts have the cautious circles.