David Paton Profile picture
Sep 22, 2020 4 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Very glad that @hannahITV is holding Ministers to account on this.

For too long they have got away with introducing restrictions that are high cost but which have little or no effect.
There is a similar issue with social mixing restrictions imposed first in the NW and which seem to have had little or no impact in reducing positive tests.

So why on earth does @BorisJohnson et al expect measures like the law of 6 to work nationwide?
Same with compulsory masks. No evidence they have slowed positive tests when introduced for public transport, shops or other venues, and in different parts of the UK at different times.

Again, why do Ministers think extending compulsory masks to pubs/cafes will help?
Ministers seem to be selecting restrictive measures almost at random from the "high cost but little or no evidence they will be effective" shelf.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Paton

David Paton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cricketwyvern

Feb 13
Many MPs who supported the assisted suicide bill at 2nd reading were motivated by people dying in pain but also worried about pressure being put on vulnerable people. In response the Bill Committee has decided:

1. Not to include pain as a criteria for assisted suicide.
...
...
2. Not to protect homeless people or prisoners from assisted suicide, despite evidence both groups are particularly vulnerable to suicide.

3. Not to protect people requesting suicide because they feel they are a burden on others.
...
4. Not to protect people requesting suicide due to being “unduly influenced” by others.

5. Not to protect people requesting suicide because they are worried about financial cost of care.
...
Read 4 tweets
Nov 27, 2024
🧵
Just because @KimLeadbeater asserts the slippery slope can’t happen does not make it true.

Let’s spell out how the slippery slope may operate in principle & practice:
...
...
If the #assistedsuicide bill passes, MPs will have accepted the *principle* that it is okay to help some groups of people commit suicide.

With that principle established, the question becomes which group of people should be included.
...
...
The current bill specifies those judged to have 6 months to live are eligible (whether or not in pain).

There is little logic in arguing that someone not in pain but with 3 months to live should be eligible but not someone in pain & with, say, 7 months to live.
...
Read 8 tweets
Nov 13, 2024
Let’s talk about Oregon: a good model to follow according to Leadbeater assisted suicide bill supporters.

After legalisation, the numbers of assisted suicides skyrocketed from 16 in 1998 to 367 in 2023.

If Eng & Wales end up at same rate that's over 5,000 people each year.
... Image

The huge increase in assisted suicides has not led to a reduction in other suicides (this is one of the issues @kimleadbeater claims her Bill will address):

the rate of unassisted suicide in Oregon has increased by more than 20% since 1998.

43% of those who are helped to commit suicide in Oregon, say they were concerned about being a burden on friends, family or carers.

The percentage worried about being a burden has increased significantly over time – it was just 13% in 1998.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 29, 2024
The @Channel4 @reformparty_uk racism row is developing into an astonishing story. Whether or not Ch 4 paid Andrew Parker, hard to see how they can come out unscathed.

As I see it, there are 4 possibilities:

1. @Channel4 set up & paid Parker. They are explicit they did not.
...
...
2. Someone else (production company or a 3rd party) paid Parker.

If @Channel4 knew, this is as bad as Option 1.

If Ch 4 didn't know, it means they did no due diligence.
For such a consequential story, that would be grossly irresponsible & must lead to consequences.
...
...
3. Parker was acting unpaid deliberately to smear @reformparty_uk .

Again, either @Channel4 knew, in which case their piece was deliberately deceptive, or they did not, which would again mean no due diligence & grossly irresponsible journalism.
...
Read 8 tweets
Nov 11, 2023
What action should be taken about @SuellaBraverman's @thetimes article alleging bias in policing?

I suggest four things that might be done:

1. The police commit immediately to stop arresting people for praying silently in their own minds.
...
Image
Image

2. The police commit immediately to stop intimidating people for expressing perfectly legitimate views about transgender issues.
...
Image
Image

3. The police commit immediately to stop aligning themselves with particular lobby groups.


Image
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Oct 31, 2023
An objective examination of the data and evidence suggests that delaying the March 25 lockdown decision by a week or so would have saved lives.

Here’s why …

We know from deaths data, NHS Triage and React that infections were almost certainly decreasing well before 25 March (and the rise in infections was levelling off even earlier). But those data were not available by the 25th.
...
...
It remains possible lockdown caused an even faster reduction in infections, preventing some Covid-related deaths in the short run but …
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(