As an investor, I think it's impt to understand your strengths and weaknesses. And sometimes your strength IS also your weakness.
1) Some self-reflections here:
2) First and foremost, I'm a marketer. By training and background. At big cos and at my own past startup(s). My startup even sold to marketers. I even used to do affiliate marketing.
Customer acquisition is THE #1 thing I think about and live, eat, breathe.
3) And often, esp in software, where PM fit is not clear, customer development and cust acq is key priority to figure out and derisk.
As such, I orient most of my thinking around how do I think a co can acquire customers. What is that angle and scalable path?
4) And when I look at decks and ideas, that's also how I think about things. In fact, I recent made a video on how I think about opportunities here:
tl;dr I don't initially look at teams or the product. Just the idea and think through the cust acq.
5) This framework has served me well over the years. But it also means that I will miss out a lot. And there are particular categories where I will ESPECIALLY MISS OUT.
"Community oriented" products are easy to miss out on if you are coming in w this mindset.
6) What do I mean by "community oriented"? They don't necessarily have to be social networking sites. They can be B2B even (which we do a lot of investing in).
But they tend to be very bottoms up / "grass-rootsy". I just don't know how to think about that playbook.
7) But I've had lots of "misses" / near "misses" w cos in this cat. E.g. We were too late for @MemberstackApp. Too slow for @contrahq & later begged our way in (at a higher val)! I init declined an intro to Circle.so & now our whole @HustleFundVC commun uses it
8) The problem w/ this category is the go-to-market is really very product driven since it's so bottom's up. Both in terms of the user exp as well as in the "sharing & interaction" mechanisms.
So you have to try the product.
9) Really using a product in depth and for a while is the key. So it's actually much more involved than looking at a deck & pontificating about cust acq.
And how do you know which cos to prioritize over others? If you are trying these 5 prod it means another 5 will have to wait
10) And what has happened in all of these cases is that one of my teammates will later tell me they are using a product that pitched us for themselves or for our commun & ppl love it.
And that is when I really feel like a doofus.
11) Even more of a doofus when my team really really LOVEs the product for the product-sake (not because other investors are in) & I later try to invest after the fact.
And so, after this happening many times now, I've realize that this is just not *my* particular category
12) tl;dr your strengths are your weaknesses.
But knowing that is probably the first step to solving it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
-Pre-seed rounds are getting done at low valuations.
-Hot pre-seed rounds are getting done all over the map
-Seed rounds are getting done at say $8m+ post with companies that have lots of traction -- sometimes $1m+ rev runrate
Last yr, I personally paid more in taxes than what I made (!!).
I was completely shocked - I didn't think it was possible to *owe more* than you make. But it is.
To be clear, this post isn't meant to ask for pity, but I think it can help a lot of ppl out.
More >>
1) First, every VC and many bootstrapped startups are advised to set up LLCs.
E.g. LLC for your funds. An LLC for your management co. An LLC really for any partnership. Etc.
We're told this is tax advantageous.
But like everything else, it depends...
2) So how is this possible?
First, how do LLCs work? My ELI5 explanation of an LLC is that when you make money, the taxes get passed through to the business owners -- the partners of that LLC.
So EVERY dollar that comes through is taxed to YOU as the business owner
Today HR 2799, a legislative bill, has passed the House of Representatives in the US. This bill will have a huge impact on startups and emerging fund managers if it can become a bill.
2) The backstory: VC funds are only allowed 99 accredited investors. This means that if you want to raise a $50m fund, your average check size from each of your investors must be over $500k.
$500k is doable (and small) for institutional investors — pension funds, endowments, etc
Today’s tweet thread is about VC audits and how they affect startups.
I know…*such an interesting topic*…but actually it’s *extremely important* with the current market for founders.
More here >>
1) First, what is an VC audit?
Many VC firms hire a 3rd party auditor to analyze their funds annually. This gives their investors (LPs) confidence that fraud is not being committed, capital in the fund is being deployed into legit companies, and performance is not fabricated.
2) Auditors charge *tens of thousands of dollars* per yr to audit a fund.
As an aside, if anyone is thinking about creating a tech-enabled audit firm for microfunds, I’m extremely interested.
There are very few auditors for VC funds on the market.
It's been about a year since the markets crashed for startups and VC funds. In the past year, it's been incredibly hard for both funds & startups to raise $$.
I'm no crystal ball, but here's what is happening from my standpoint & where I think the mkts are going.
More >>
1) First, what am I seeing now?
For startups, there are basically 3 categories of companies who need to raise somewhat soon:
-doing great
-doing fine
-doing meh or not good
If you don't need to raise for another yr or more, then you're in good shape.
2) In the last category, this is where most cos are getting wiped out.
2021 prolonged the lifetime of startups that would've ordinarily died in a "normal" market. Companies w no product-market fit.
Many of these companies were given an extended lifeline with valuation markups.