I don’t think this is an inconsequential quibble. We don’t ‘build the Kingdom of God’. We do proclaim the Kingdom. The Kingdom of Jesus is not identified with a nation-state, military, political or economic system. We are citizens of a heavenly kingdom built by Christ not by us.
We recognize that Christ does in fact rule all things now. His “kingdom” is that rule made visible among people. It is not of this world, but is certainly for this world, though it won’t reach its fulness apart from the eschaton. Among other things, that means human attempts to-
secure here on earth a perfect expression of the eternal kingdom of God, whether in religious states or utopian communities, end in tyranny. They often resort to violence in order to impose or maintain their rule - whether psychologically in sects or politically in governments.
This Kingdom of God resides first in the soul, though it is never confined to it. God’s Kingdom coming fully is the perfection of all things. God’s Kingdom already come is his perfect forgiveness, abolition of death, & overthrow of evil. It is a kingdom of holy love & mercy.
We enter the kingdom and the kingdom enters us. We proclaim the kingdom and we serve the King of Kings as his citizens. That citizenship both subverts and takes precedence over all other loyalties and makes its virtues our sought after common practice. This is what it means to...
“seek first the Kingdom of God and his righteousness”. That is a summons first of all to faithful living. This means kingdom virtues such as love, humility, forgiveness, & kindness are extended to all, even enemies. “That’s not Kingdom” is shorthand for saying an action doesn’t..
...accord with the virtues of Christ. The overthrow of Jim Crow is but one example of Kingdom virtues triumphing over secularist values of tribal power in a nation. Yet in this world it is always imperfect and the wheat grows alongside the tares.
No Christian who seeks to serve in the public should be criticized for seeking to bring kingdom virtues to the public realm - our Faith is deeply personal but never private. But neither should any imagine that we “build the kingdom.” What we do is show the Kingdom and dwell...
... here as members of imperfect colonies of the heavenly realm. Those colonies of the Kingdom are congregations of the Church. They are not utopian. They seek to be forgiving because “forgiveness is the name of love among those who love imperfectly.”
What secularists want is faith to be privatized. That’s impossible for a Christian. It is public faith. What religionists want is for faith to govern all culture & government. That’s impossible in the American Constitutional Republic. Liberty is for all, regardless of faith.
What the Christian can do then is not impose his/her view of the world on his neighbor but instead allow the kingdom graciously imposed on his heart to shape his actions toward his neighbor. Informed by mercy, love, respect, and hope, the Christian serves all to show the Kingdom
The Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve and give his life as a ransom for many.
That’s what the upside-down kingdom looks like. A lion that’s a lamb. Build the kingdom? No. Show the kingdom? Always! May all believers do so in every realm of life.
This includes the realm of justice. The idea that a religious person cannot properly perform their work without improperly imposing their religion is utterly false - and prejudicial. Informed by their faith they will seek to do justice, love mercy, & walk humbly.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As a pastor I care deeply about doctrine, practice, caring for our members and ministry team, our mission, & our city. Controversies sometimes matter and I don’t shy away from those in which I’m convinced I could help or offer support. But I don’t go looking for them.
I’m far more engaged over people getting engaged, or parents dropping off their kids for college, celebrating a new friend’s first 30 days of sobriety, and praying with a family that’s working thru the pain of extended unemployment. My soul is far more occupied with a local
hospital dedicating a Nurse’s station to the honor of a fellow-pastor’s wife who died earlier this year of breast cancer. Her name is Terri Bartuska - she was a GREAT nurse and beloved in their community. Her husband Peter is grieving and adjusting and serving, trying to enter
In the past weeks I've read Christian "influencers" urging the faithful to abandon "blue" states for "red" and cities for the rural life. But this often fear-based effort is an attempt to choose which neighbors we will love rather than choosing to love the neighbors we have.
Jesus is Lord of, present in, and on mission in a city of millions as much as in the shire. And having served in both, I've also met the devil in both as well, I assure you. We are on mission in both and are called to fidelity in both. Retreat from or to either isn't an option.
The struggles for the sanctification of our soul and our churches varies in kind and degree in both, but the battle is no less real - or deadly in both. The glories of both are just as real and joyful too. "Dwell in the land and cultivate faithfulness" is still good counsel.
Cultural Christianity isn't the same thing as Nominal Christianity, Christendom, or even Christian culture. Cultural Christianity is simply shorthand for the "philosophical canopy" of shared virtues that permeates a society & is passed along via certain texts & truths.
The societal rejection of the virtues that the Faith celebrates, teaches, and encourages, necessitates a new unifying canopy. This really is revolutionary activity. But which canopy should replace it? Fragmentation in Western society (broadly considered) or the US in particular
... demonstrates the crisis over which unifying principle and virtues will emerge victorious in that conflict for supremacy. One popular option is simply the supposed absence of any such unifying principle - a radical expressive individualism that imagines no canopy exists -
Peter stepped over the threshold of Cornelius' house into the promise God's mission. The boundaries of God's mercy were wider than Peter imagined. He did this because Christ had already stepped over the threshold of eternity to eat with unclean people, inviting us to his feast.
The Gospel of Grace triumphed over the boundaries of people. In an effort to repudiate what is bad and preserve the good, some still try to rebuild the walls and create a false "us vs. them" dichotomy, which denies the wide embrace of the Gospel.
But building one another up does not mean we should build walls to keep others out. Legalism creates Christian subcultures that take us out of the world rather than integrating us into God’s mission in the world.
You can't simply pray about a kid being gunned down because he rang the wrong doorbell. It's going to take more than prayer. God doesn't do what he's commissioned us to do. He's entrusted work to us, empowered us for the work, and is with us in the work. But the work to be done -
...is nevertheless our work. Prayer doesn't transfer the work back to God. Prayer invites his grace to accompany us in our work. Work without prayer is practical atheism; prayer without work is presumptuous theism. Prayer is work, but it is not the only work to do but rather...
... the first work we do. Then we have to actually evangelize, fight injustice & bloodshed, dig wells, feed the hungry, visit the sick and imprisoned, educate, and make disciples. When it comes to violence in this society, prayer is a must. But stop thinking that prayer alone...
Fiery trials certainly contribute to who we become but also reveal who we already are. Crises are apocalyptic - they reveal as they transform. This is true for persons, families, congregations, and even nations. The crisis of the past few years...
... has permitted a revelation of the US church so that it can be transformed. We can expect continuity and massive discontinuity, collapse & renewal, and mercy amid judgment. What's been revealed is both beautiful and ghastly. The beautiful must be preserved...
... while the sinful and profane are confessed and abandoned. A massive realignment in the Church is underway and will likely accelerate. The impulses for preservation on the one hand and innovative renewal on the other are understandable and complimentary responses.