Not an odd belief as such. But I've pretty much lived in 1 bedroom apartments all my life. And I'm social animal who hosts a lot. So there's always been a bed-dressed-as diwan in my living room. Not "day bed" or pull-out-couch cos they aren't as comfy. Proper living room bed.
Started off kinda ad hoc in my first own "adulting" home, which was a 1 bedroom in Bombay. Landlord had left an extra bed. I put it in the living room with some nice pillows. Bombay so people kept visiting and staying over. Turned out to be a great asset for those visitors.
Next home was State College, PA during PhD. A friend had an extra mattress and box set. Did the same. Again, great for hosting friends from all over the northeast. And the practicality of the idea jumped even more in a Manhattan 1 br. Some slept months on it! Living room bed #ftw
Helps having a wife who's also grown up sleeping in living rooms and tiny apartments, so we are on the same page re practicality over "aesthetics". Our apartment is the most un-decor-ed. It's like we are college roommates who are married. 🤣🤣
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Students were fascinated to learn how ICC, then Imperial Cricket Council, was the main force in limiting growth of cricket as a global sport in 1900s by defining test cricket as only matches between Commonwealth members.
Holland, Argentina, US had good teams too. But the ICC...
But ICC, literally an Imperial body, actively chose to exclude the Dutch, Americans, & Argentinians (1910s were golden are of ARG cricket), fearful of losing control of the sport.
Cricket in those countries never really recovered from this. It stays a Commonwealth heavy game.
Even in 1900s & 1910s, cricket was popular enough in the US to fill stadiums in many cities. Level of play & interest was high.
But just as World Series started in 1903 & baseball was taking off, ICC in 1909 actively refused an opportunity to bring US into the cricket fold.
This will set many unkil hair on fire but when you read the full multi sided history of the 1962 India China war, there isn't much to blame Nehru about, except using hindsight and weirdly high standards and expectations of clairvoyance. And Cuban missile crisis is minimized. 🧵
First of all, Indian defeat in the 1962 skirmish is overblown for Nehru bashing purposes. And it really was a skirmish not a war. How many wars have zero civilian casualties?
India lost 1300 soldiers. Not great. But not exactly Vietnam War numbers. We lost half those in Kargil.
Losing territory is never great but Aksai Chin was and is mostly uninhabited territory more useful for strategic and logistical purposes than losing actual people inhabited territory.
China didn't march on and take Leh or Srinagar, did they? It was a very opportunistic skirmish.
DMs filling up with "hey can you explain this Zohran phenomenon to me" from friends & Desi columnists lol.
So this will be my NYC Mayor election mega 🧵. FAQ of sorts.
I first truly noticed Zohran in 2023 when he put out an anti Modi statement. As Ro was sucking up to Modi /1
I had known of Zohran vaguely for a couple of years before that, but it was as a huge fan of Mira Nair. I had heard her son was running for state assembly. Not exactly a glamorous & enriching career. But even then I thought, that's sweet. He's choosing public service!
The only son of Mira Nair & Zohran Mamdani, while definitely no billionaire, would still have enough social networks and financial fallbacks to try to make a career in Hollywood. Or academia. Or anything really. Even wall street banker.
The historic reasons for why England (and most of it's ex colonies) and Japan drive on the left but Europe, USA, rest of the world drive on the right are fascinating. And predate the invention of cars.
It's about chariots/wagons vs single horses as primary transportation. 🧵
In Europe, the Romans built highways 2000 years ago for military and supply chains. Lots of chariots & wagons involved.
90% people are right handed, so held the reigns in their right hand. So it made sense to sit on the left. And drive in the right. As a norm, then rule.
Britain tho, until 1800s, was a tiny island without the scale or logistical needs of Continental Europe. Transport there was primarily individual horses. 90% people are right handed there too. But right handers climb a horse from the left, using the right arm to pull them up.
Last week in Pune, I went to many cousins' & friends' new or recent homes. In and around Pashan. And I could picture exactly which areas were sure to flood. I've walked those hills for years.
Why is it called Pashan?
Some of the oldest & hardest rock on the planet!
Marathi has a word for seasonal streams. ओढा. Literally means "to pull".
Those rocky hills had centuries, millennia old odhas which took water from heavy rain all the way down to the rivers. Mudslides were unheard of, given how hard the rock was.