Steve Peers Profile picture
Sep 23, 2020 13 tweets 5 min read Read on X
New EU migration and asylum pact

Press release - ec.europa.eu/commission/pre…

Legal texts (main communication, five legislative proposals, soft law, roadmap, staff working document) - https://t.co/4Ai5rcWD6n
Main points in today's EU migration and asylum package.

Not everything is new - the Commission is reverting back to its prior proposals on qualification of refugees, reception of asylum seekers, resettlement of refugees, the EU asylum agency, and return of irregular migrants Image
Key new/amended proposals - on fast tracked screening of asylum seekers at the border. Not automatic rejection but limited procedural rights etc. Likely to raise human rights concerns. Image
The 2016 proposal to replace the Dublin Regulation is dead; long live the 2020 proposal to replace the Dublin Regulation. The bits on relocation of asylum seekers were impossible to agree last time. The new "return sponsorships" might attract more support. Image
Some proposed changes to the core Dublin rules on responsibility for asylum seekers. Family unity rules still apply. New rule if the asylum seeker has a diploma from a Member State! Longer responsibility if asylum seeker crosses border irregularly; explicitly applies to rescue. Image
A significant proposal to integrate refugees and people with subsidiary protection: it would be possible to get EU long term resident status after three years, not five. Includes possibility of moving to another Member State (although not full free movement of people). Image
New emphasis on expelling non-EU citizens without a right to stay - not just the legislative proposal, but a head honcho for expulsions Image
The Commission keeps saying it thinks voluntary returns of irregular migrants (avoiding detention and use of force) are important.

Nice, but its 2018 proposal *reduces* voluntary returns, as discussed here: eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2020/08/the-pr…
It's a day with a 'y' in it, so the Commission wants to collect, store, process, yada yada more personal data of non-EU citizens Image
A separate proposal to deal with asylum crises. Impossible to agree on before (leaving aside the emergency short term relocation decisions of 2015, which were barely implemented anyway). Maybe possible to agree if it will never be used, like the 2001 EU temporary protection law. Image
Legal migration too: the Commission wants to relaunch its proposal to revise the Blue Card scheme for higher paid non-EU migration, discussed here: eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/07/the-ne…

Relevant to Brits moving to the EU after the Brexit transition period.
Also plans (coming next year) to propose revision of the laws on long term residents (especially re movement between Member States)and non-EU workers in general. Also relevant to Brits soon; the long term residents law is also relevant to Brits covered by the withdrawal agreement Image
Finally, from the Commission guidelines on smuggling of migrants: search and rescue at sea cannot be criminalised, in accordance with international law of the sea Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steve Peers

Steve Peers Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @StevePeers

Jul 15
1/ Imagine taking this guy seriously as a source of interpretation of EU law. In my field, the ultimate example of the Dunning-Kruger effect. Let's look at the claim in more detail. Image
2/ "illegal": Digital Services Act expressly provides for the possible negotiation of commitments from the platform

"Secret": Art 80 DSA expressly requires publication of those commitments

"Other platforms did a deal": according to the Commission, all other cases are pending Image
2/ "illegal": Digital Services Act expressly provides for the possible negotiation of commitments from the platform

"Secret": Art 80 DSA expressly requires publication of those commitments

"Other platforms did a deal": according to the Commission, all other cases are pending Image
Read 13 tweets
Apr 18
1/ Brexit law- proposal to negotiate a youth mobility treaty between the EU and the UK

Press release - note basic rule would be a 4-year stay for 18-30 year olds who meet the conditions

But wait, there's more ec.europa.eu/commission/pre…
Image
2/ EU/UK youth mobility treaty proposal - questions and answers

Note equal treatment in tuition fees, points re traineeships, visa fees, health surcharges, application to all Member States - would UK government accept all this? (Also a question to ask Labour)
Image
Image
3/ EU/UK proposed youth mobility treaty - text of proposed Council decision and explanatory memo

Note it would also include family reunion (not further detailed at this point). Dispute settlement system of the Brexit deal would apply (not the CJEU)
commission.europa.eu/publications/c…
Read 7 tweets
Dec 8, 2023
Summary of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act just agreed #AIAct
europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-…
Agreed EU rules on law enforcement use of artificial intelligence #AIAct Image
Further details of the newly agreed #AIAct in the Council press release
consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press…
Read 5 tweets
Dec 6, 2023
1/ Here's the Rwanda bill - my thread with the main points follows
2/ The context of the bill is the recently agreed Rwanda treaty. The issues in clause 1.3 *might* be enough to convince courts to change their mind on the safety of Rwanda since the Supreme Court judgment, but as we'll see it's a moot point: the bill dispenses with courts anyway. Image
3/ clause 1.4.b is correct: an Act of Parliament that breaches international law is still valid *domestic* law. BUT it will remain a breach of international law.

(We are likely to hear from people who do not understand these basic points) Image
Read 26 tweets
Aug 26, 2023
1/ I am seeing this being shared. A few points. Image
2/ The spiel in the link confuses the two EU courts, which is not impressive. In fact the applicants in this case lost earlier in the EU General Court, then lost their appeal this year to the CJEU. And this omits to point out that the CJEU had ruled on the substance in June 2022. Image
3/ My comments on the previous judgment: '.
Because the Court ruled here that Brits lost EU citizenship because UK left the EU, it said this year that Brits had no legal interest to sue the EU to challenge the withdrawal agreement to get it back.eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2022/06/its-en…
Read 9 tweets
Aug 14, 2023
Profoundly ignorant on both points. A) the Good Friday Agreement requires compliance with the ECHR. That necessarily entails the Strasbourg Court. There's no legal route to saying that it applies but to the peace process only. 1/
2/ And the idea that it applies to the "peace process" but not "foreign nationals" is confused - for the obvious reason that some of those covered by the former ground may be Irish citizens.
3/ The Strasbourg Court jurisdiction is relevant to Northern Ireland for a very, very obvious reason: it had ruled that the UK had breached the ECHR in Northern Ireland after British courts had ruled that it had not. "Just rely on British courts" therefore misses the point.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(