Steve Bezner Profile picture
Sep 23, 2020 13 tweets 3 min read Read on X
"Therefore let us be grateful for receiving a kingdom that cannot be shaken."--Hebrews 12:28

Brief thoughts on "building the Kingdom," as it has appeared in a few headlines.

First: "The Kingdom" is not synonymous with where you go after you die.
If you read the New Testament, you'll see that Jesus is saying the Kingdom is "at hand." You'll see that the Kingdom is "good news for the poor." You'll see the term "Kingdom" is in the New Testament more than the term "gospel."
In short, the Kingdom is when those who choose to follow Jesus live their lives under the rule and reign of Jesus right now. They are not waiting for death. They are embracing the surprising and countercultural Way here and now.

Love of enemies, peacemaking, forgiveness, etc.
The way we sometimes shorthand it at my church:

The gospel is the message; the Kingdom is the reality.

The gospel is the message of Jesus' Incarnation, Crucifixion, Resurrection, and Impartation of the Spirit.

The Kingdom is choosing to live in light of that glorious message.
When Christians talk about "building the Kingdom," they mean that they want as many people as possible to embrace the Jesus Way of living. This isn't political, at least not in the traditional partisan way of thinking. This is about seeing Jesus' vision of reality coming to be.
E. Stanley Jones's book, "The Unshakable Kingdom and the Unchanging Person," helped me on this front a great deal. Highly recommended. In it, he describes what it means to live under the Way of Jesus in a world that often values the exact opposite of what he teaches.
Building the Kingdom, however, isn't something we believe can be completed this side of Heaven. It is simply an acknowledgement that we are to live in this Way and to encourage others to do the same (by faith in Jesus).
Instead, we believe that one day Jesus will complete the Kingdom when he returns and sets all things right. Therefore, the Kingdom is "now, but not yet." We live it now, as best we can, but know that it is not yet completed.
We describe it as "living Heaven now," akin to Jesus praying, "on earth as it is in Heaven." Hence, a motto at my church is, "In Houston as it is in Heaven."
Christians hear the gospel message: Jesus is God's Son; he has come to show us how to live; he has died for our sins; he has been resurrected to give us hope of eternal life; he has given us his Spirit to live with power now--and we have believed this to be true.
Then, in light of that message, we live the Kingdom: Jesus' Way of life found in the New Testament, particularly the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7), but not exclusively there. We believe we could not live it by our own power, but we need the Spirit of Jesus to help us.
Consequently, Christians (should--not all do) work to "carry the Kingdom" into any number of domains in this world in order to make it more like Heaven: medicine, business, art, agriculture, politics, etc.

The goal is to our job as best we can and to do it in a Kingdom way.
So, when you hear someone talking about "building the Kingdom," they usually mean to live the Way of Jesus in their specific place in the world. Hope this helps Christians and non-Christians alike better understand the teaching of "the Kingdom."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steve Bezner

Steve Bezner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Bezner

Dec 1, 2023
🚨 SBC Insider Baseball Tweet Thread Alert. 🚨 I made this somewhat cheeky tweet in hopes to demonstrate what I perceive to be hermeneutical inconsistencies and some confusion re: the proposed Law Amendment. I saw a few questions in response, so wanted to follow up and clarify.
First, my original tweet. I was attempting to point out how many of those who want to read the role of females in the NT church as “crystal clear” will simultaneously ignore other seemingly “crystal clear” commands or apply a cultural hermeneutic to them. For example…
Romans 16:16 says, “Greet one another with a holy kiss.” This is common in some church cultures, but not in the United States, because it doesn’t translate into our culture. We usually shake hands or hug. But I don’t see lots of folks leading a “holy kiss” movement in the SBC.
Read 25 tweets
Nov 8, 2023
I don’t talk a ton about my health on the socials, but I’m texting with a longtime friend who is up against it right now in the battle with cancer, and I wanted to share a couple of quick things.

For the uninitiated: I have heart failure and should’ve died in 2003. 🧵Thread:
For all my passion about living the Kingdom here and now, my source of hope is that one day the dead in Christ will rise and Jesus will bring about the death of death. Some days it's the only thing that keeps me going.

If you’re disease-ridden:

We hope in the Resurrection.
When this life feels like too much, I go to the following places in my Bible:

Romans 8
1 Corinthians 15
2 Corinthians 1
Revelation 4
Revelation 21

Then I ask myself: “Do I really believe this?”

If the answer is yes, then I have to live accordingly.
Read 10 tweets
Oct 27, 2023
Two days ago news broke of an amicus brief filed in which the SBC, SBTS, and Lifeway were all third parties. The suit attempts to prevent the statute of limitations being lifted in cases of sexual abuse. I waited a beat before speaking to ascertain facts and await explanation.
As best I can tell, the EC acted unilaterally w/o trustee approval. The trustees were voted on by messengers and messengers have consistently and nearly unanimously voted in favor of sexual abuse reforms since @RobertDownen_’s @HoustonChron story in 2019. houstonchronicle.com/news/investiga…
The EC opposing this lawsuit unilaterally without consulting trustees is bad on a number of levels. I understand EC leadership must make decisions w/o trustee approval from time to time, but this topic has been at the forefront of discussion and reeks of self-preservation.
Read 7 tweets
Sep 15, 2023
🧵 There is a narrative often peddled in certain circles that the SBC is in decline bc of liberal drift.

In truth, the SBC’s decline has happened during the watch of the Conservative Resurgence.

Meanwhile conservative non-denoms are growing. As is conservative Pentecostalism.
What if it’s not about theology near as much as it’s about hypocrisy? About greed? About misogyny? About racism? About covering up abuse?

Most folks who talk to me about our affiliation with the SBC aren’t worried about theology.

They are tired of unethical leadership.
Personal opinion: The SBC isn’t shrinking bc of theology.

The SBC is shrinking bc too many folks in leadership positions talk about Jesus but sure don’t act like him.

People can spot a fake from a mile away.
Read 5 tweets
Sep 8, 2023
He told me about a church planter in his city who destroyed his church through a series of character issues (not moral failings, to be clear) and then was immediately hired by a megachurch in his city.

He said: “Is he an amazing speaker? Yeah. Will the church grow? Probably.”
He continued: “But I’m worried about who will be hurt as a result. And I’m worried that no one will care.”

This is one conversation with one friend. Anecdotal and all that jazz.

At the same time, he hit on some things I’ve been thinking about.
When I was trained as a pastor, there was little talk about emotional health and character. I think it was assumed.

At the same time, I saw “seminary smugness” come over many of us.

Knowledge puffs up, you know?
Read 7 tweets
Mar 17, 2023
🧵 I’ve been waiting for @Saddleback to release an explanation of their position before saying much regarding the recent dust up on whether or not they are in friendly cooperation with the SBC. Bottom line: I’ll vote for their reinstatement. Here’s why:

youtube.com/embed/J15dGUQQ…
1. Saddleback’s position may not be “hard” complementarianism, but it falls within what many other churches in the SBC do in practice: an all-male elder board gives ministry oversight to the work of the church. Stacie operating as @BethMooreLPM used to say: “under authority.”
2. Unless I am mistaken, the SBC has not regularly disfellowshipped churches who have women with the word “pastor” in their job titles, *unless* that person serves as the senior/lead pastor. Andy is clearly the lead pastor.
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(