Sonia Sodha Profile picture
Sep 24, 2020 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Couple of qus on the unfolding uni saga...

1) If you couldn’t ensure regular mass testing available on campus why get unis back this term, as unpalatable as not doing so would have been? Getting 100s of students to self isolate or trying to limit their movement is worse?
2) Wouldn’t it have been better to focus on distance learning for the first term/semester and give students a fee rebate for the whole of first year?

(It would require provision for young people and mature students who couldn’t live at home eg care leavers.)
This would have been really awful for a generation of young people already failed by A level saga, but is it better than having to self isolate in box rooms in halls for weeks? Feels like govt should have at least asked these qus.
But this would require a coordinated national policy response and funding for fee rebate, and there has been none from the government on universities. DFE & Gavin Williamson have been absolutely dreadful in this pandemic.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: the total and utter lack of thinking about how to mitigate the impact of this pandemic on children and young people is just so utterly depressing.
This was so predictable and is so miserable for the students affected.

theguardian.com/education/2020…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sonia Sodha

Sonia Sodha Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @soniasodha

Sep 1
Why I don’t think this is a strong argument against the HE (freedom of speech) provisions🧵

1. Production of knowledge is the core purpose of universities. Academic freedom/academic free speech fundamental to that. At the mo there’s no effective means to enforce existing rights.
2. Academic freedom/free speech key to quality in the HE sector. You can’t have latter without former!
3. There is already a well-established & better understood regime for enforcing disability and other PC rights under the EqAct. Of course aspects onerous & imperfect. See this.
4. Seems weird to argue we should not be striving for or developing best practice around empowering ECHR academic freedom/FOS rights because of issues in other areas. In fact I’d say if the OfS scheme works could be a model for dispute resolution pre legal action in those area.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 28
Another case of a nurse suing a Scottish NHS Trust for failing to provide single-sex changing facilities. The facts will be established by the employment tribunal, but this issue raises serious qu for NHS & for Labour on its position on the Equality Act.

thetimes.com/uk/scotland/ar…
I know I sound like a broken record but it simply isn't sustainable for the Labour party position on this to be "but the Equality Act's clear!" - when what is happening in the courts & in the real world, not to mention statements from @EHRC, show very clearly that it isn't.
Also I *really* wish this scenario would get put to politicians rather than it always being about toilets. Shouldn't the Eq Act be amended so it becomes clear that it's sex discrimination not to provide female employees with female-only changing facilities? If not, why not?
Read 5 tweets
Jun 24
Thread on why Labour’s existing position on gender and sex (“the Equality Act is clear on protections for single-sex spaces” - it isn’t - and “we’re going to make it easier for men to qualify for protections normally reserved for women”) waters down those protections for women.
The Equality Act contains exceptions that allow for provision of single-sex spaces, services and sports. But it doesn’t define sex. The Gender Recognition Act allows males to be treated as tho they were female for most legal purposes.
We simply don’t know if GRA provisions mean a man should be treated as though he were female for Equality Act purposes. It’s unclear & Labour are misleading us when they say the Equality Act doesn’t need clarification on this point. The Supreme Court will eventually rule on this.
Read 13 tweets
May 19
V important legal victory for Roz Adams against Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre. Emp tribunal found ERCC discriminated against her on basis of her gender critical belief & constructively dismissed her. ET on investigation against her: "reminiscent of the works of Franz Kafka." 🔥
The CEO of Edinburgh Rape Crisis centre is Mridul Wadhwa, a male who identifies as female. In 2021, Wadhwa said female rape survivors who do not want to see a male counsellor who identifies as female should "reframe their trauma."

heraldscotland.com/news/19509343.…
Yet another legal case that shows how far the capture of gender ideology goes in workplaces that consider themselves "progressive" - & how that ideological capture has led employers to discriminate & constructively dismiss women who believe sex is real & matters in law & society.
Read 7 tweets
May 1
Just catching up with today's judgment from the president of the family division of the High Court in relation to a case involving private hormone provider Gender GP. There's so much that's shocking in these few paras.

bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/…
Image
1. That the court found it so hard to engage a UK endocrinologist they had to go to Australia - telling in itself.
2. Prescription of testosterone to a 15 year old girl diagnosed with autism & anorexia with no physical exam and "extremely poor quality" psychological assessment
3. No record of counselling the girl on the known risks of hormone treatment.
4. Testosterone prescribed at extremely high levels in a "negligent approach" that led to "dangerously high" levels putting J at "risk of sudden death".
Read 7 tweets
Dec 20, 2023
Why has the government’s school guidance for gender-questioning children engendered such different reactions? A thread.
There are two views of sex and gender when it comes to children. 1. When a child questions their gender it’s the sign of a fixed trans identity, and disclosure is akin to coming out as gay/lesbian/bisexual.
2. When a child questions their gender it may be a sign of a fixed trans identity that will last into adulthood but evidence suggests it's more likely to resolve itself through puberty & can be associated with things like autism, processing same-sex attraction & childhood trauma.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(