Some new books on Mueller investigation trying to dance around question of Mueller's mental acuity during critical days of Trump-Russia probe. Here's what really happened... 1/18 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/column…
Go back to July 24, 2019. Mueller testified before Congress. Observers were shocked. He appeared confused at times, had difficulty answering basic questions. Trouble forming complex sentences. 2/18
The Trump defense team was *not* surprised. They had seen it themselves. Back in April 2018 had meeting with Mueller. One topic: Well-known DOJ policy that sitting president cannot be indicted. Huge part of Mueller investigation. And Mueller couldn't remember it. 3/18
Trump team stunned. The old Robert Mueller would have known everything about it. But 2018 Robert Mueller fumbled, could not recall. Said 'I'll have to get back to you on that.' And this was not on obscure, arcane issue but matter central to investigation. 4/18
Was last time Trump team ever spoke to Mueller. Mueller staff built wall around him. Trump lawyers never saw Mueller again, never spoke to him on phone. 5/18 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/column…
Months before, in February 2018, former Trump communications adviser, former DOJ colleague of Mueller, was interviewed by prosecutors. Mueller himself dropped by to say hello. Adviser concerned by Mueller appearance. Asked Mueller staff: Is Bob OK? They said he was great. 6/18
Then, after report written, Mueller, aides went to DOJ to brief Attorney General Barr. Mueller hands trembling, weak, aides did most of talking. Barr wondered: Is he OK? 7/18
Then Democrats demanded Mueller testify on Hill. Undaunted by failure to establish collusion, they wanted Watergate moment. Televised hearing, Mueller delivering searing indictment of Trump, public rising up in support of impeachment. Didn't happen that way. 8/18
Mueller didn't want to testify. Barr gave him an out, said 'If [Mueller] decides he doesn't want to be subjected to that, the DOJ will certainly back that.' Message to Mueller: You don't have to put yourself through this. But Democratic pressure was great. Disaster unfolded. 9/18
All of this is recounted in my new book, 'Obsession: Inside the Washington Establishment's Never-Ending War on Trump.' 10/18 amazon.com/Obsession-Insi…
Now, there are three other books covering Mueller. One, by Jeffrey Toobin, ignores Mueller cognitive issue. Another, by New York Times' Michael Schmidt, says NYT heard about Mueller problems in days leading up to July 2019 hearing. 11/18
Schmidt, NYT asked Mueller officials about Mueller mental acuity. Were told there was no problem, was offensive that they would even ask. NYT never reported the story. 12/18
Next week, we'll see another book, by Mueller 'pit bull' Andrew Weissmann. From news accounts, does not seriously engage questions of Mueller cognitive health. Consistent with pattern of Mueller staff covering for him. 13/18
So what does it all mean? Why it is important? Think back to when Mueller was appointed. He hired a lot of Democratic donors, including one (Weissmann) who actually attended Hillary Clinton 2016 election-night event. 14/18 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/column…
When Trump protested, Mueller defenders jumped in. Bob Mueller is straight down the middle, they said. Scrupulously fair. He will keep those prosecutors in line. He will be in charge. 15/18 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/column…
Then Trump defenders began to see that Mueller wasn't in charge, or wasn't fully in charge. 'Bob at the end was AWOL,' said Jay Sekulow. 'He showed up for cameo appearances.' 16/18 amazon.com/Obsession-Insi…
Sekulow: '[Mueller] was the Wizard of Oz. He was back behind the big curtain, pulling some strings here and there, but when you pulled the curtain away, he wasn't even really the one pulling the strings.' 17/18 amazon.com/Obsession-Insi…
THREAD Washington Post does story with headline, 'Trump quotes Putin condemning American democracy, praises autocrat Orban.' Raises question: OK, what did Trump say? 1/12 washingtonpost.com/elections/2023…
Put aside Orban. After all, the US political system did not convulse for years over Viktor Orban, as it did over Putin. So what did Trump say about Putin? 2/12
First graf of Post story says Trump's words, in campaign speech in New Hampshire, were 'part of an ongoing effort to deflect from his criminal prosecutions and spin alarms about eroding democracy against President Biden.' 3/12
A new study of trans in America. Big majorities have not used hormone treatments, not had surgery. Big majorities prefer *not* to be called 'trans woman' or 'trans man.' (Prefer 'nonbinary' or 'gender non-conforming.') 1/5 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/a-new-…
Total number: Slightly less than one half of one percent of US population. Of that small number, 70 percent do not present themselves in public as trans all the time. Sometimes do, sometimes don't. 2/5 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/a-new-…
What to make of it? First the trans industry needs to hit brakes on life-altering, irreversible procedures--surgery, puberty-blocking hormones--on minors. 3/5 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/a-new-…
Chinese balloon story getting more troubling tonight. WSJ, others reporting that Biden administration now says earlier, Trump-era Chinese balloon incursions happened, but nobody in US government knew about them at the time. 1/4 wsj.com/articles/biden…
Story, as told in WSJ, is that Biden officials 'pieced together' what happened later. So Trump administration veterans are telling truth when they say they never knew of such things, because the Biden team figured it all out later. 2/4 wsj.com/articles/biden…
For that to be true, one has to believe that US government missed these huge balloons over the US. Did that really happen? Seems hard to believe. Or did military spot them but not inform civilian leadership? Seems harder to believe. 3/4
Big news last August when Adam Schiff, Dems asked Intelligence Community for 'damage assessment' of Trump classified documents case. Show the terrible harm Trump has done to national security! So now, months later, has anyone seen the assessment? 1/5 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/whatev…
Answer: No. 'We have not been briefed,' says House Intel member. 'I'm still waiting,' says Senate intel chair Warner. 'Damage assessment' nowhere to be found. 2/5 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/whatev…
IC silence leading to theories. 'If there had been something significant it would have been briefed and leaked by now,' said one Hill source. Warner seems to think he's getting the runaround. 3/5 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/whatev…
Several headlines tonight along lines of 'U.S. May Execute Its First Openly Transgender Woman.' Missouri prisoner was convicted of killing 'former girlfriend.' Journalists straining to avoid saying that killer, Scott McLaughlin, was a man at time of 2003 murder. 1/4
In prison, Scott McLaughlin was mentored by another murderer, James Hicklin, who successfully sued state of Missouri to force it to pay for transgender hormone treatment. James Hicklin now goes by name Jessica. 2/4 apnews.com/article/legal-…
Three years ago, Scott McLaughlin began taxpayer-funded transition. Now goes by name Amber. Among other arguments, last-minute petition for clemency says Scott McLaughlin suffered from gender dysphoria. 3/4
On Republicans joining J6 Committee: One thing McCarthy feared was that committee leadership would keep GOP members in dark about what was going on. So now, look at this episode from @DraperRobert piece in NYT: 1/4 nytimes.com/2022/12/23/mag…
@DraperRobert Late June. Cheney has gotten explosive, revised testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson. Members don't know what is going on. Cheney & Thompson summon them to SCIF for hush-hush meeting on June 28. 2/4 nytimes.com/2022/12/23/mag…
@DraperRobert Cheney & Thompson tell J6 members: We've got something big. There's a hearing in three hours. Here's the script. That afternoon, the show went on. 3/4