This week has been so difficult. Obviously we're at a point of absolute national crisis and that takes up a lot of mental space. But here in Omaha and of course also in Louisville, we're hammered by examples of a justice system that doesn't function for one part of our community.
If we're not talking about the murders of James Scurlock and Breonna Taylor because they happened somewhere else to someone else, or because we're focused on all the other terrible things that are happening, then we're ignoring the way that these murders are allowed, legitimated.
We can't ignore that justice simply isn't experienced the same way for everyone in our communities. Twenty years ago, when I first started working in prisons and learning (and teaching) restorative justice, I was fortunate to spend time with Howard Zehr, a pioneer in this field.
From Zehr and from the activists, victims, prisoners, and community leaders I met, I learned that in parts of our communities justice is experienced like rain: something over which we have no control and which is unrelated to our actions. Sometimes it rains; sometimes it doesn't.
By contrast Zehr writes, "True justice requires...that we ask questions [like]: Who has been hurt? What do they need? Whose obligations and responsibilities are these? Who has a stake in this situation? What is the process that can involve the stakeholders in finding a solution?”
We have a great deal of work to do before justice is something that we all experience, rather than something about which so many of us feel hopeless or cynical. A victim-centered justice system, one that is constantly grappling with issues of power and inequity, is long overdue.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’ve been extremely surprised by the whole university presidents Congressional hearing debacle. First, I’m surprised by the number of people who think Rep. Stefanik was somehow acting in good faith or is some sort of friend of Jewish people. She wasn’t and she isn’t.
Second, I’m surprised by the people who think the university presidents were somehow tricked or couldn’t have answered differently. They weren’t and they could’ve.
It should be possible for very smart people to stake out a position that notes how strongly we want to adhere to a free speech position while also making clear that any code of conduct that allows students to call for genocide at their university should be reexamined.
Gather around, my friends, and let’s talk about the public library for a minute.
In Nebraska, a handful of extremists have spent a few years hurling abuse at their local library staff and before it gets any more out of control, library boards are trying to placate them.
For example, the Fremont library board is considering creating a tiered card system so that parents can make sure that their kids can’t check out material that’s inappropriate for their age. It won’t stop the extremists from calling librarians “groomers,” but it’s a fine idea.
The thing is, it’s also no different from what happens when I go to the library with my kids right now. My kids have library cards, I take them to the library, I see which books they want to check out, and then we check them out together.
Wow, this article about Nebraska’s combined anti-trans and abortion ban bill.
Hat tip to Senator Armendariz, who says she doesn’t know anything about the issue, doesn’t pay attention to current events, and wishes the bill she voted for hadn’t been introduced.
It passed by 1 vote.
These are the people who devoted an entire legislative session to taking away people’s rights in the face of massive opposition from experts and ordinary citizens. They openly admit that none of their constituents mentioned this issue to them and they don’t know much about it. 🤷♂️
Read the article. It’s amazing. We have a handful of legislators who care enough to listen and learn. And then we have the majority, who seem not to know or care what they’re doing as long as it feels right to them and they have the votes to do it. Awful. nymag.com/intelligencer/…
When I tell you that @jim_pillen is an extremist and that his policy preferences are out of step with the citizens of this state, you can believe me. Or you can read it for yourself. He put it all on his website.
He wants to ban from public schools every subject and every lesson with which he doesn’t personally agree. And he wants Jesus in public school. He’s clear that he’ll be a governor for Christians. Not Christian? Well you probably should be. Why would anyone vote for this theocrat?
He’s also very clear that he wants to ban abortion and doesn’t care about the health of the pregnant person. Your pregnancy is killing you? Your problem, not Jim’s. You were raped? That’s sad…but not for Jim because he’s excited about the rapist’s baby he’s forcing you to carry.
I had the opportunity to attend a very small gathering yesterday at which @jim_pillen spoke and fielded questions for about 40 minutes. One thing that struck me was that he was well-prepared and a big part of that preparation involved how not to answer any questions he faced.
Pillen was repeatedly challenged on his extreme position on abortion, on his desire to ban all sorts of things he doesn’t want to be taught in public schools, and on the way in which he wants to make his faith into the state’s religion. He dodged literally every question.
When he was asked multiple specific questions about his desire to outlaw all abortions, he just repeated that he wanted to save as many babies as possible. This was his response to my question about what he thought the punishment should be for a 10 year old who gets an abortion.
When I moved to Nebraska in 2007, the university was universally beloved. In fact, I used to tell my colleagues in other states how nice it was to live in a place where everyone loved the university because everyone had some sort of personal connection to it.
When I would meet someone in Nebraska and tell them that I was a professor at the university, that was a mark in my favor. Just a few years later, people would sneeringly refer to me as "professor" because it meant I was an out-of-touch ivory tower liberal from out of state.