Eric Tymoigne Profile picture
Sep 24, 2020 5 tweets 2 min read Read on X
An animated GIF of the financial balances through time. OECD countries. DPB: Domestic private sector balance, GB: Government balance, FB: Foreign balance.
DPB + GB + FB = 0
It looks to me that we can detect a cycle that reflects the business cycle. Start NE, goes SW, goes E, goes N. Start again. May be I am reading too much into it.
Better quality. made with this ezgif.com/maker
Side note, I prefer this version of the graph for two reasons:
1- It shows GB as a residual, which is one of the point of MMT: GB adapts to the needs of the system. Gov has little control over its budget.
2- It shows the F sector from perspective of that sector rather than from domestic economy's perspective. E.g. US-foreign trade is shown not by looking at the CABus but its opposite: CABf = -CABus. Always found it easier to think that way given it is done for the other 2 sectors.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eric Tymoigne

Eric Tymoigne Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tymoignee

May 8
Reading Justinian Digest,& came across this.Q for lawyers out here,is it saying the following?"a claim on money is only a numerical claim, contrary claims on commodities. As such a monetary claims does not involve weighing, merely counting by tale."
@rohangrey @NathanTankus Image
A few other nominalistic passages: Here is Ulpian telling us that all denarius coins are the same, a contract cannot stipulate which specific denarius to receive, contrary to merchandises. Image
Here is Javolenus saying that Valoristic principles do not apply, i.e. a loan contract cannot link a monetary sum to a fixed quantity of goods (i.e. in case of inflation, debtor does not need to compensate creditor for loss of purchasing power) Image
Read 4 tweets
May 8
Daniela's and George's make me think of two papers I wrote long ago about that period of time. FDR was a fiscal hawk who reluctantly used planning to manage the economy. I'll develop in a bit.
The two papers are:
“Job Guarantee and Its Critiques: Insights from the New Deal Experience.” International Journal of Political Economy, 42(2), 2013: 63-87.
“Minsky and Economic Policy: ‘Keynesianism’ all over again?”In The Elgar Companion to Hyman P. Minsky. Edward Elgar. 2010
Minsky was heavily influenced by Keynes but rejected the Keynesianism of the 60s a la fine tuning ("bastard Keynesianism").Keynes = planning full employment and investment.
The Minsky paper goes on to study Keynes's influence on the Roosevelt Era and Kennedy-Johnson Era
Read 16 tweets
Apr 9
Finishing to review a couple of papers on MMT related topics and this leads me to share a few things. If you equal MMT to QE, fiscal dominance and/or a push for monetary financing to accommodate its other policies, then you need to improve your understanding of MMT. 1/
MMT proponents are explicitly against QE, they want to keep the central bank balance sheet small and nibble (See for example Fullwiler and Wray 2010 paper on QE) 2/
MMT proponents do not analyzed the Treasury-Central bank interaction in terms of a game. Rather they analyzed it institutionally & conclude that there is a routine & old coordination between the two entities. 3/
Read 11 tweets
Feb 24
Koopman:"Money is not a uniform but a dualistic phenomenon:'medium of exchange' or 'medium of payment' on the one hand and 'unit of value' [...] on the other hand are not two 'functions' of one and the same thing,'money',but rather two different objects of knowledge." CORRECT
Translation in English: There can't be a means of pay and medium of ex without a unit of account first (because the first two r denominated in the latter). So "money" is not a list of functions that is either this or that. Monetary system = unit of account + monetary instruments
Monetary instruments can be used in a variety of functions, be of any made of any kind of material, be immaterial, change their relation to the unit of account, etc, etc.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 21
Knapp's State Theory of Money quick summary (leaving aside exchange section):
1-There are /= payment systems ("pay-society") that may or may not use the same unit of account (UA) & means of payments (MP). Banks & state are two main ones.The state has“the oldest society of payers”
2-“Money always signifies a Chartal means of payment”, Charta = token/ticket defined by law. Banks issue private chartal means of payment, the state issues its own. They circulate by tale ("chartality") instead of weight ("pensatory")
3-The state may accept in its payment system some MPs it doesn't issue,hence his point that private bank notes“form part of [the state] monetary system”,which greatly increases their area of circulation(NOTE: he is NOT saying that state acceptance defines what money is,that is 2)
Read 10 tweets
Oct 2, 2023
Have been working on a specific topic of the history of thought of monetary theory: nominalism and financial approach (instead of functional approach) to monetary systems. The goal is to trace back the origins of these ideas all the way back to the Greeks. 1/
Got to say to say it is not easy because most of the authors that work on these topics are usually completely ignored in well-known "Money" treatises so you've got to go off the beaten paths and hang of a few references here, or luck, to hopefully get something 2/
Authors such as Innes, (thomas) Smith, James Taylor, among others do not appear anywhere or are at best briefly mentioned. The commodity theory, medium of exchange, metalist view are being presented as the serious way to do monetary analysis. 3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(