Serious question for journo & tech colleagues -- why isn't there a micropayments model for reading online content a la carte?
I'm a huge believer in "pay the writer." I believe writers (and outlets) should be paid for content. But why are the only $ models subscriptions or ads?
There are maybe 1-2 outlets I read enough to justify a monthly subscription, from which I get most of my news. But I read some very specific writers from a range of outlets, but just those individuals. I would be *happy* to micro-pay per article for their stuff.
I'm legit curious why for all of the tech wizardly people have created there isn't some kind of wallet one can put into a month and then micropay an outlet per article.
Large AI models like ChatGPT and GPT-4 are inherently dual use.
@OpenAI's GPT-4 system card walks through several possible misuse risks, including for hacking, disinformation, and proliferation of unconventional weapons (e.g., chem/bio). cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4-s…
OpenAI assesses that GPT-4's cyber and chem/bio capabilities are limited today, but AI progress is discontinuous and large models frequently show emergent capabilities.
Dangerous capabilities are likely coming and we may not have much advance warning.
China is building a new model of tech-enabled authoritarianism at home.
The Chinese Communist Party has deployed 500 million surveillance cameras to monitor Chinese citizens.They increasingly use AI tools like facial and gait recognition.
China is exporting its model of digital authoritarianism abroad. At least 80 countries use Chinese surveillance and policing technology.
(Map data courtsey of @SheenaGreitens. Map by @CNASdc)