Delhi High Court begins hearing Adv Ashok Arora's suit against his removal from the post of Secretary, Supreme Court Bar Association.

Matter is before Justice Mukta Gupta.

#AshokArora #SCBA #DelhiHC
Today BCI was to reply: Arora
Adv Rajdipa Behura appears for BCI.

BCI had suspended the resolution of SCBA: Behura

Why is the Plaintiff here then: Court
Arora is relying on your stand. If you have the power over SCBA then why this suit?: Court

SCBA did not accept our resolution: Behura

What is your power to interfere?: Court
BCI derives its power from the Advocates Act. We can lay down standard of conduct.. we have to power to safeguard the rights of Advocates: Behura
Power is vis a vis an advocate practicing or as a member of Association. Here, it is not vis a vis his right to practice as an adv. Where is the provision which gives you the power to interfere in the present case?: Court
Behura reads the resolution passed by BCI on May 10, 2020.
BCI makes it clear that normally it does not interfere in the affairs of bar associations but here it was an extreme case: Behura
Behura finishes reading the BCI resolution.

It has not passed any order which is beyond its jurisdiction. Looking at the magnitude of this case and in view of powers under Advocates Act, this order was passed: Behura
Just because SCBA is registered under the Societies Act, it doesn't mean that they would not be bound by the Advocates Act: Behura
Behura refers to a judgement on this point of law.
Ratio is laid down on BCI's function. BCI ensures that Advocates do not behave in an unprofessional and unbecoming manner. All Advocates are under disciplinary jurisdiction of BCI: Behura
BCI Resolution was as per this judgement and section 7 of Advocates Act: Behura
BCI concludes.
Only issue is whether only a general body meeting could have passed the suspension order : Court
Court breaks for lunch. Matter to start at 2.15 pm.
Hearing resumes.

#AshokArora #SCBA
Senior Adv Arvind Nigam appears for SCBA.
Under Advocates Act, Bar Councils have the power to regulate the profession. Section 7 of what BCI is relying upon. These power do not include judicial power: Nigam
They cannot hear appeals from Advocates: Nigam
They cannot hear appeals against actions of independent bodies such as Bar Associations: Nigam
BCI has no jurisdiction to intervene. It's a different matter when the decision impinges upon court work such as strikes: Nigam
Nigam reads a judgement passed by Supreme Court on strikes by lawyers.
That is the backdrop against which a direction was passed to BCI to regulate conduct of lawyers. Strikes impinge court work: Nigam
Nigam continues to read the judgment.
BCI did not issue any directions to State Bar Councils who have not said anything. BCI has misread Harish Uppal judgement. The present case pertains to the internal management of a private Association: Nigam
It is not business of BCI. SCBA is a private Association. BCI has no power. In the absence of specific power, BCI action is entirely without jurisdiction: Nigam
When we pointed this out, BCI issued a show-cause notice. In their written submissions they say that BCI decided to await the outcome of the petition filed by Arora: Nigam
Arora filed a petition before the Supreme Court. In the application to withdraw the petition, Arora said that the petition was being withdrawn because a Committee was set up by SCBA : Nigam
Reason for withdrawal was the Committee. There is nothing about the suit being filed: Nigam
This constitutes an unconditional withdrawal under O23 R1. Once you have Instituted and withdrawal unconditionally, you can't file again on the same cause of action : Nigam
For interim relief, he must have a prima facie case.. the grievance of plaintiff is the subject matter of proceedings before three judges now. One of the three has recused : Nigam
That Committee was constituted in June. He appeared before the Committee and has submitted to the jurisdiction of the Committee: Nigam
Arora has relied upon Rule 35 of SCBA Rules: Nigam
Nigam reads Rule 35.
This is in relation to a member you want to suspend or expel: Nigam
Nigam reads Rule 14.
Arora has not been suspended from the membership of SCBA. I was suspended from the Association in 1991: Nigam
The President convened the meeting under Rule 14. He recused from the meeting. Arora was given the chance to present his views and counter views: Nigam reads the written submissions.
Rule 14 gives power to President to fill the vacuum in the rules. When rules were framed, nobody expected that elected members would misbehave: Nigam
Nigam lists earlier instances of suspension of elected members from SCBA posts.

There is past precedent. BCI did not intervene then: Nigam
Everything is not provided for in the rules. In doens't mean that in the absence of powers nothing can be done. If the President is wrong, he can be thrown out. Elections are coming: Nigam
The plaintiff threatened criminal action, attempted to highjack the Association .. : Nigam
President did not participate. The deliberation was of committee members. Arora was part of Executive Committee. The meeting did not have behind his back. His position is recorded. But BCI did not hear me when they passed their resolution and they talk of natural justice: Nigam
How many forum is the plaintiff going for shopping. It is a classic case of forum shopping. He went to the BCI. If the BCI order was final and binding, there should only be an execution and there should not any suit : Nigam
This is vexatious pleading. If he believes BCI had the jurisdiction, let him sink and swim with the order passed by BCI: Nigam
His suit is barred by the specific relief act. He is seeking a permanent injunction. For an interim injunction, the plaintiff has not made out any case at this stage: Nigam
I don't want to say anything more this: Nigam
When application was filed before Supreme Court for withdrawal, the suit was not in existence. Under CPC, another suit is barred. This is not the case here: Arora
Two wrongs do not make a right. Rule 14 is not applicable: Arora
Court records that parties have concluded arguements in the stay application.

Parties to file written submissions in 4 days. Suit to be heard next on November 6.

Order on interim relief to Ashok Arora reserved by Court.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Aug 8
#SupremeCourt to hear plea by POCSO judge from Bihar, challenging suspension order by Patna High Court for allegedly convicting and sentencing an accused within a day.

#pocsojudge #pocso
Bench of Justices Uday Umesh Lalit and S Ravindra Bhat to hear matter.

Read more about the plea, here:

#pocsojudge #pocso…
Matter passed over as counsel for Patna High Court not present yet. Senior Advocate Vikas Singh appearing for the petitioner.

#SupremeCourt #pocsojudge #pocso
Read 14 tweets
Aug 8
Supreme Court to hear a plea challenging a 1993 central govt notification declaring Muslims, Sikhs, Buddhists, Parsi and Jains as minorities at the national level. PIL seeks minority status for Hindus in states where they few in number #SupremeCourt #Minority
Bench: Mr Datar said he'll see if a special dispensation can/needs to be provided. Which is the other similar matter?

Adv @AshwiniUpadhyay: Pleadings are complete.

#minority #SupremeCourt
Upadhyay: Court had said approach the National Commission for Minorities. Hindus Minorities in some States.

Justice Lalit: theoretically you're right.
Justice Bhat: If SC has said it had to be State-wise, why should we interfere?
Read 6 tweets
Aug 8
Supreme Court to hear a plea objecting to the twin sharing allotment of the Supreme Court chambers in the additional building complex. Recently the allotment draw of lots was completed for the chambers

Sr Adv Ranjit Kumar: Committee met us and it gave a decision

Justice DY Chandrachud: now lots have also been drawn. What is the first document of July 28?

Kumar: it was suggested that chambers could be allotted single also depending on availability depending on seniority etc
Justice Chandrachud: now let us close this..

Kumar: we are here for all the members of the bar..Please see this. It was stated 2 lawyers will be alloted single chamber in old complex and the larger chambers in new building will be allotted too..
Read 12 tweets
Aug 8
#SupremeCourt to hear plea by Times Now anchor Navika Kumar seeking quashing of criminal proceedings initiated against her in different States in connection with the remarks made by former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma against Prophet Muhammad on a debate aired by channel.
Bench of Justices Krishna Murari and Hima Kohli to hear the matter.

Read more about the case here:

#SupremeCourt #TimesNow @navikakumar…
Matter to be taken up now
@navikakumar @TimesNow #SupremeCourt
Read 12 tweets
Jul 23
Supreme Court judge, Justice Ravindra Bhat, to shortly speak at a conference on Women in Power & Decision Making by the PHDCCI.

Track this thread for live updates 👇🏽

#SupremeCourt #WomensRights Image
Justice Ravindra Bhat begins his address: Before I begin, I must confess I'm acutely aware the irony that being a man I'm speaking here. It calls for genuine engagement.

#SupremeCourt #WomensRights
Justice Ravindra Bhat: The proverbial issue of making room for women at the table, is not just a women's issue. It needs to be worked at a systematic level.

#SupremeCourt #WomensRights
Read 69 tweets
Jul 23
Chief Justice of India N V Ramana to deliver inaugural ‘Justice S B Sinha Memorial Lecture’ on “Life of a Judge” being organised by National University of Study & Research in Law, Ranchi.

Track thread for live updates 👇
#CJINVRamana Image
CJI NV Ramana: Justice Sinha was a great crusader of human liberty. This topic of lecture was often discussed by Justice Sinha with his colleagues and his friends.

CJI NV Ramana: at the end of second world war, it was clear for modern democracies that law is not a mere one way projection of authority.

Read 72 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!