Why the Indian Farmers are protesting (a thread):
#AntiFarmerBJP #AntiFarmerBills
The farmers are protesting against the Three New Farmer Bills, the new bills and amendments are anti-farmer in nature.
1.The Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce Ordinance, 2020:
It allows intra-state and inter-state trade of farmers’ produce beyond the physical premises of APMC markets. State governments are prohibited from levying any market fee, cess, or levy outside APMC areas.
2. The Farmer’s (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement of Price Assurance:
Facilitates creating a national framework for contract farming through an agreement between a farmer and a buyer before the production or rearing of any farm produce.
3.The Essential Commodities (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020:
Allows the central government to regulate the supply of certain food items only under extraordinary circumstances(eg, war and famine). Stock limits may be imposed on agricultural produce only if there is a steep price rise.
APMCs are established by a state government to ensure farmers are safeguarded from economic exploitation. The bills allow opening up the agricultural markets outside APMCs.

The bills remove trade barriers b/w big private corporations and farmers.
It would be wrong to assume that private players don’t exist today and the APMC is a monopoly. Private players exist but are regulated by APMCS. They actually look to the APMC for a reference price to conduct their own transactions.
The regulation on limits on selling prices would be removed. The state governments would have less control over the market and its ability to tax agricultural produce, losing a source of income.
So, the corporates don't pay the state. Their monopoly is bound to rise in regulating the market. So more and more exploitation.

Now you’re trying to create an alternative that’s outside the APMC, which is on advantageous terms where you don’t have to pay mandi fees or taxes.
In the end, farmers get less money, we normal citizens would have to buy the highly commercialized products while the already big corporations hoard resources.

Saying farmers can choose is very preposterous. The big corporations are bullies and manipulative. There would be no safeguards and no government watching over.

Farmers can enter into bonds with corporates.

These bonds are nothing but deceiving. Do you think corporates would be playing it fair? They have not been playing until now. What happens when a small farmer comes into a dispute with such monsters?
The government is not accountable for regulating prices.

Big businesses are well-positioned to interact with a lot of farmers because they have field staff. But eventually, many of them end up co-opting farmer cooperatives or anybody who’s able to aggregate produce for them.
So, though we keep saying that these Bills will facilitate direct transactions with farmers, what we are seeing is not dis-intermediation, but re-intermediation.
Companies will find that it’s too expensive to work with a large number of farmers and look for intermediaries who will aggregate produce for them.

Market is open to Mass Privatisation.
So, firstly, the one with enough resources can only profit in reality. Unquestionably, Labour exploitation rises due to the manipulative nature of marketing. The rich get richer by the extraction of labour. FARMERS ARE NOT YOUR BONDED LABOUR.
A system that thrives on less input would do anything to cut down its need for employees. So stop living in the delusion that privatization creates more opportunities. The farmers are going to be hit the hardest here. They know their fights better.
Bills are being passed without any opposition, in a empty parliament. This is murder of democracy.
@idkyMeh thank you for helping!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Anandita🏳️‍🌈

Anandita🏳️‍🌈 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @devilsxblessing

17 Oct
Airtel can now collect and share your personal information with third parties (a thread)
Airtel's updated Privacy Policy says Airtel can now collect sensitive personal information such as sexual orientation, genetic information and also data related to Political opinions, Religious beliefs, Psychological data, sex life, Financial data, Health, passwords (2/n)
Trade Union Membership and share all of this with third parties. It can also share this data with Government agencies and authorised law enforcement agencies.

Airtel will not take accountability for any data leaks in case the Airtel systems are hacked. (3/n)
Read 9 tweets
6 Oct
The government has set up a committee to rewrite all of our criminal laws. Here's why the Committee should be disbanded. (A thread)
Criminal laws define the limits of what we can do without the fear of punishment. They are meant to have safeguards to ensure that the police, the Government, and those in power cannot jail, punish or kill people at will.
All indications suggest that this committee has been set up to widen the net of criminal laws and to dilute what safeguards exist to prevent unfair prosecutions/persecution and wrongful convictions.
Read 14 tweets
5 Oct
Everyday casteism ( a thread ) #DalitWomenRise
1. You’re casteist if you say, “You don’t look like a Dalit”.

2. You are casteist if you believe calling a savarna “a savarna” is casteism.

3. You are casteist if you say, “We LET the Dalits speak".
4. You are casteist if, you say Hindu festivals have nothing to do with ‘caste’. "It’s Indian culture & I have a ‘choice’ to celebrate them and not politicize everything like you do."

5. You’re casteist if you say, ‘Why you bring caste angle in everything’.
Read 8 tweets
20 Aug
Stop calling people 'misandrist' when they say "Men are trash".
First of all, we KNOW that good men exist, 'surprisingly' we know that. Using a simple snake metaphor by Jesse Vhasy, "We all know that snakes are dangerous, yet there are some snakes which are not deadly. (1/n)
However, you never hear people say ‘some snakes are dangerous, some are not’. They just say, ‘snakes are dangerous’ because it is hard for the person to tell which snakes are dangerous and which snakes are not, so they urge people to be cautious of all snakes." (2/n)
"Men Are Trash" is like saying "Fruits are sweet." Not all fruits are sweet but we don't say "fruits are sweet but some fruits are sour", it's simple linguistic understanding. It’s common sense-we say it because there are more than enough men to make us feel afraid(3/n)
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!