THREAD 1/ "When the facts change, I change my opinions. What do you do? - Attributed (without evidence) to John Maynard Keynes, hero of "How To Make The World Add Up" ch 10
Why is it so hard for people to change their minds?
2/ Partly, we make public statements and then we get stuck. We feel don't want to admit making a mistake. Opponents call us out for our inconsistency. A shame.
3/ But it should be really easy to update beliefs based on new information. For example, I wrote in August that the chance of being infected was 44 in a million per person per day. I still believe that is true.... of August.
Source: ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
4/ The chance then fell to 40/m/day. Then to 36/m/day. It doesn't require any enormous intellectual humility to say that in late August the invididual risk from the virus was falling.
The weekly ONS survey is published late each Friday morning: ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
5/ But then... the facts changed.
The weekly ONS prevalence survey showed 58 infections per million people per day. Then 110. (Doubling every 7 days? Not quite. But not far off.)
6/ New data due in a matter of minutes. I'll be paying attention. Alas the same cannot be said for Janet Street Porter, who writes in the Daily Mail...
7/ "Tim Harford, whose show More or Less on Radio 4 unpicks the truth behind statistics, has predicted that there's a 44-in-one million chance of getting infected with the virus in the UK if we act sensibly"
8/ Apart from the word "predicted" I can't argue with that. "Explained" or "reported" is the word I'd use. But that number is 5 weeks old. It's about to be 6 weeks old.
I'm really hoping that the prevalence survey flattens off, but that is a hope not an expectation.
9/ This is an important idea from "How To Make The World Add Up". Are we using numbers to try to win an argument? Or are we using them to try to understand the world?
I want to understand the world - which is why we shouldn't ignore five weeks of data. timharford.com/books/worldadd…
6b/ And the update is we're up to 175 cases per million people per day. Up 50% in a week. (The usual caveats apply: there's a broad margin of error and these results pertain to last week.) ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is my father-in-law, Eamonn Monks. He was born in Dublin in 1933 and came to the UK in the mid 1950s. At first he lived in London, where he trained as a dentist and met his future wife, Brigid.
But later Eamonn and Brigid moved to Poulton-le-Fylde, outside Blackpool. This Irish immigrant became a pillar of the local community, caring for the community’s aching teeth before becoming a dentist for the prison service. The Northwest was lucky to have him…
…and his amazing children, who became a) Britain’s best baker b) One the UK’s finest audiologists c) The founder of an amazing mental health charity in Hackney d) the driving force behind Liverpool’s parks and green spaces and e) An award winning portrait photographer...
Why children can be better than adults at spotting misinformation: ft.com/content/157d51…
For the past few months I've been trying to figure out how to help 9-13 year olds make sense of the world (and particularly the numbers that describe it).
It might seem an umpromising task...
Most adults struggle with complex statistics and many feel powerless to evaluate almost any claim in the form of a number. An unnervingly large minority doubt straightforward claims. If the adults can’t cope, what hope do pre‑teens have?
Oo, first glimpses inside The Truth Detective, which is out next week! Ollie Mann has done a wonderful job bringing my ideas to life.
For those asking, the book is aimed at 9-13 year olds, although I keep having to confiscate my copy from the grown-ups...
Here's one of our Truth Detectives, Muhammad Yunus, microfinance pioneer and advocate of the "worm's eye view"...
Here's magician Derren Brown tossing a coin and getting ten heads in a row - with NO MAGIC REQUIRED.
How is it done?
Large complex projects have a habit of going wrong - sometimes catastrophically wrong. Just ask @dgardner and @BentFlyvbjerg, authors of the well-worth-your-time new book "How Big Things Get Done"
But @BentFlyvbjerg has found that if large complex projects are built up from repeated modular elements, the same gloomy tendency does not apply. Modular projects are less likely to overrun and vastly less likely to overrun catastrophically. Why is this?
If if may permitted some mild grumpiness, I present my opinionated guide to bad email etiquette. Whether you’re a cubicle dweller or a corporate communications supremo, here are the seven types of email you should never send... ft.com/content/5700be…
1) The email reminding me that my 7.34am train tomorrow departs at 7.34am. Or that I will need to bring my passport if I want to get on the plane. Stuff changes (especially these days) so these emails must be read. But they're an insult to the 99% least incompetent customers.
2) The omnibus email. On and on it goes, rambling like a pub storyteller. Generally if you have three different things, three short emails will be better; then I can deal with each one in turn. Also...
Tell me, people, is there a sexier word in the English language than "storage"? ft.com/content/557fd6…
Ah, okay. You may be right. But that's a problem. In today's column I ask whether we're skimping on storage (I think we are, even after accounting for hindsight) - and if so, why.
Part of the problem is that the "storage business model" is regarded with distaste. Start a business in which you fill warehouses with PPE, toilet paper, bottled water, bottles of cooking gas, and rice, then sell it all on at a profit when there's trouble; you'll not be thanked.