Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 25, 2020 6 tweets 4 min read Read on X
BIG win for Vodafone as Permanent Court of Arbitration issued an unanimous decision, holding India to be in breach of the ‘fair and equitable’ treatment obligations under the BIT.

@VodafoneIN @Idea
The lawyers for Vodafone are Harish Salve and the team of DMD Advocates (Anuradha Dutt (in picture), Feresthe Sethna, Haaris Fazili and Kunal Dutt)
Decision:

1) Tribunal has jurisdiction
2) Vodafone is entitled to fair and equitable treatment laid down in the Article 4(1) of the Agreement
3) Government of India's conduct is a BREACH of GUARANTEE under Article 4(1)

#VodafoneIdea #Vodafone @VodafoneIN
Govt of India has to pay 40 crores+ as costs to Vodafone

Government of India will reimburse Vodafone a sum of £4,327,294.50 which is 60% of legal costs of Vodafone and 3,000 Euros which is 50% of costs borne by Vodafone to the Appointing Authority.

#VodafoneIdea #Vodafone
[FULL STORY] PCA has ruled in favour of Vodafone with respect to the Indian government's retrospective tax claim of ~ $5.5 billion together with penalty & interest (~Rs 40,000 Crores) stemming from the company's acquisition of Hutch in 2007. #Vodafone

barandbench.com/news/permanent…
Government REACTION to Vodafone Judgment

"The Government will be studying the award and all its aspects carefully in consultation with our counsels."

#Vodafone #VodafoneIdea @VodafoneIN

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Aug 22
Supreme Court hears appeal against Allahabad HC order upholding the trial court’s order permitting a court-monitored survey of the Sambhal Masjid

Justice PS Narasimha: It is being argued that this case has to be seen from the lens of Places of Worship Act, 1991

Adv Vishnu Shankar Jain: Just by saying that the act is attracted does not attract the 1991 act.Image
SC: Question is survey arising out of 1991 act or the ASI act..

Sr Adv Huzefa Ahmadi: They say 1991 act does not apply..HC says there is no bar..I am in appeal and in meanwhile all surveys were stated.

Jain: On the face of it

Justice Narasimha: Yes you have a point that it is not concerned with 1991 act.. and HC gave finding against the Muslim side.. so we need to hear this.. the challenge is pending here...
SC: Mr Jain appearing for Respondent 3 to 8 takes notice of the SLP. It is surprising as to how two appeals have been filed by the same parties.

Jain: In court 4 item 10 has been dismissed.

Ahmadi: it is the mathura case...

SC: we were about to issue notice.

Justice Narasimha: Let us take a look at court 4 item 10 order.. we do not want to pass inconsistent orders. Let it be listed on Monday.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 22
Supreme Court to resume hearing the Bihar SIR case today

Earlier the top court had asked the Election Commission of India @ECISVEEP to upload online the list of 65 lakh voters proposed to be deleted during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision

#SupremeCourt #BiharSIR_2025 Image
Sr Adv Rakesh Dwivedi for the Election Commission of India: We have complied with it letter and spirit. Apart from BLA and panchayat we have also pasted this outside police stations.

#SupremeCourt #BiharSIR_2025
Dwivedi: Anyone wrongly excluded can file form with supporting documents.

Adv Prashant Bhushan: they have complied with the direction but the problem which has arisen

Dwivedi: Please see para 3.
Read 22 tweets
Aug 22
Supreme Court to shortly pronounce judgment on petitions seeking stay on suo motu directions passed Justice JB Pardiwala led bench to remove the stray dogs in Delhi NCR #StrayDogs #SupremeCourt Image
Bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan had observed that the menace of dog bites directly infringes the fundamental rights of citizens under Articles 19(1)(d) and 21 of the Constitution.

The Court had noted that over 25,000 dog bite cases were reported in Delhi in 2024, with over 3,000 in January 2025 alone, and that sterilisation rules had failed to control the problem over the past two
Thereafter a three-judge Bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and NV Anjaria heard pleas seeking stay on the order passed by Justice Pardiwala led bench.

Judgment at 10:30 am

#StrayDogs Image
Read 14 tweets
Aug 20
Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and Justice Surya Kant to shortly speak at the inaugural lecture series organised by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA).

The lecture is titled “Justice for all- Legal Aid and Mediation: The collaborative role of Bar and the Bench”

#SupremeCourt #SCBAImage
Sr. Adv. Vikas Singh (President, SCBA): Justice for all and mediation go hand in hand. It is only in the mediation process that there are no losers. In litigation there is one side which feels that it has not got justice. In mediation both sides feel like they have got justice. Justice for all is embedded in the concept of mediation.
Singh: the bar and bench should always to first think of settlement when it comes to any litigation. As litigation goes further, bitterness increases. If bar and bench both play a role in mediation and legal aid process, it will be a big opening in this subject. Today we have 5.36cr pending cases in the country. If mediation succeeds in this country it will drastically and overnight reduce the pendency of cases in this country. It can unclog the system. And ensure people in this country get justice.
Read 31 tweets
Aug 19
Supreme Court hears a plea seeking to prevent the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) from demolishing historical monuments and Sufi saints’ graves in Delhi’s Mehrauli.

Bench: Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice R Mahadevan Image
J Nagarathna: Why do you want to demolish it?

Counsel for DDA: It is a forest area.....we are against ancillary construction that come with Dargah.

J R Mahadevan: There is an express order there shall be no construction
Advocate Nizam Pasha referred to the Court’s previous order, contending that since the ASI has established the Dargah as a 12th-century monument, the opinion of the religious committee holds no relevance.
Read 9 tweets
Aug 18
Delhi High Court is hearing on behalf of Digital News Publishers Association (DNPA) seeking intervention in the copyright infringement suit filed by Asian News International (ANI) against Open AI. Image
The matter is being heard by Justice Amit Bansal.
Senior Rajshekhar Rao appearing for DNPA - It reduces my inventive to create. If ChatGPT is 'ChaatGPT' then..At some point a large chunk of my population will die. The distinguishing feature in US law is that it does not recognise storage.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(