Dígame Concejal Profile picture
Sep 25, 2020 14 tweets 3 min read Read on X
The decision not to indict the cops who killed Breonna Taylor is clearly garbage. AND it is a really good example of how American policing has not only created a culture that encourages and reinforces individual racism, but also built systems that (1/14)
2. facilitate the imposition of racism on Black people *even without* individual racism. Now understand, I'm not trying to excuse the cops who did this or to say anything about them as people. But if we say that their culpability turns on whether they knocked and announced...
3. before going into her apartment, we're missing a big part of the thing: NO-KNOCK WARRANTS ARE AN ORDINARY PART OF MODERN LAW ENFORCEMENT; PRE-DAWN WARRANT EXECUTIONS ARE AN ORDINARY PART OF MODERN LAW ENFORCEMENT.
4. These things often result in injury, death, & trauma even when all the "rules" are followed. I'm thinking about this b/c of the response I've seen to the arrest last week in Hartford of Sydnee Ransom. A lot of folks are saying, "She brought this on herself with her behavior."
5. First of all, I don't think that's true - from what we know, she was told when she was stopped that her car was stolen, which she knew not to be true, and being surrounded by cops and cop cars behind a false allegation terrified her.
6. (If you can't understand how a Black woman would lose her shit with fear in that circumstance, you need to read the news more.) But there's a procedural question to consider here:
7. The car wasn't actually stolen - it was wanted by another town's police department as evidence in a crime. So it was placed on a list, which all the police departments have electronic access to, that flags license plates to be stopped.
8. It seems as though standard operating procedure is for the police to simply stop such a car wherever they find it, make whoever is in it get out, and impound the car. No one devising this procedure seems to have considered the human cost:
9. What if the person driving the car is not a suspect? What if they're just taking their kid home from school or going to the grocery store? That's what happened here, and if you read civil forfeiture cases, you'll see that it happens all the time:
10. one member of an extended family uses a car for some illicit activity and then the unwitting owner gets their car taken by the state. Even if we accept that the other department's need to take this car as evidence is valid, we should question the procedure.
11. Was there some reason why HPD had to take Ms. Ransom's car right then and there, on Blue Hills Ave., with her child present? Could they have at least let her drive home and dealt with everything there? When police procedures are designed entirely for the needs of police...
12. civilians suffer and the law doesn't know how to respond, because all the officers involved were doing what they were "supposed" to be doing. With an on-street impoundment, the result is needless conflict, an avoidable arrest, and trauma for a mother and her child.
13. With a pre-dawn raid or a no-knock warrant, the result is the killing of an innocent woman, and officers again deemed not responsible - b/c they were doing what they were trained to do. Punishment for individual officers has immediacy and satisfies our sense of justice, but
14. if the departments aren't held to account for procedures that prioritize police time and resources over civilian wellbeing, it won't stop.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dígame Concejal

Dígame Concejal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RSGAT

Feb 26, 2023
Here is an opinion piece about assaults against transit workers. It says the assaults are increasing and implies this is because homeless people are doing them and they have more access to buses because fares are free. But there is literally NO DATA... ctmirror.org/2023/02/26/ct-…
That is not to say that assaults on transit workers shouldn't worry us. They should! But this piece draws a lot of conclusions about the gravity of the problem and its causes with no factual support...
The piece repeatedly says these assaults are "increasing." Then it points to the number of assaults on Metro North workers in 2022:
Read 16 tweets
Feb 26, 2023
Saw Avatar 2 with the 15-year-old. It was pretty, but imagine having a bazillion dollars to make your epic political statement movie and your politics haven't gained any nuance since you were a high school sophomore. That's this movie.
It's like, you invent a whole planet with fantastical landscapes and ten-foot-tall people, but basically it's just, "What if all the naive bullshit ill-informed white people believe about native people were just 100% true?"
Also, the totally made up forest-dwelling native people in the first movie are basically Algonquin, and then in the second movie they go meet the totally made-up tropical island-dwelling people and they are 100% Maori.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 24, 2023
Many years ago I wrote an article that was, in part, about how most of the SCOTUS case law that has curtailed the 4th Amendment is fundamentally based on judges' instinctive sense that inherent Black criminality is a real thing and worthy of great caution. Now, ...
having recently read some SCOTUS caselaw on prosecutorial immunity, it becomes clear (unsurprisingly) that the same irrational fear underlies jurisprudence there. There is almost no SCOTUS caselaw on child welfare law, but the state appellate law I have read - which is a lot -
tends to have a very strong element of the same attitude, maybe extending beyond inherent Black criminality to inherent Black indolence and violence. And the thing is, it's so palpable to me, the way this unarticulated fear guides judicial reasoning - the violent skepticism...
Read 5 tweets
Feb 20, 2023
My client on appeal, a mom of four, had been struggling to extract herself from a coercive relationship with an older man while her children were removed by the state child welfare agency. She obtained a voucher for housing appropriate to the size of her family. BUT...
the supportive housing rules say you can't apply based on kids who are in DCF care - you have to get them back first and then apply. But DCF and the juvenile court take the position that your kids can't be reunified until you have appropriate housing. Luckily, the application...
isn't at all clear about this, so my client applied for housing for all her kids because she thought that was what she was supposed to do, and that's how she got the voucher. Obviously, she told DCF about having the voucher to try to convince them to return her kids. Instead...
Read 4 tweets
Jan 10, 2023
They should not prosecute a crime committed by a first-grader. This is not actually a difficult question.
I wouldn't even say, conclusively, that they should prosecute his parents. I would say that they need to see what is happening at home. But potentially removing this child from his parents, without knowing more, won't necessarily improve the situation.
I know everyone wants to punish someone when a preventable tragedy happens, but I don't think we know enough yet to say that punishment is in order. Like, do we want to keep this child from harming himself or others, or do we want to make ourselves feel good?
Read 4 tweets
Mar 4, 2022
OK, let me tell you a story. A child is born and both the mother and the baby test positive for cocaine. So DCF removes the child from the hospital. Eventually, the child is returned to both parents under a period of agency supervision. 1/27
2. Part of the supervision is that the mother has to take drug tests. When some of her tests come back positive, DCF tells the parents, "You have to live apart and the child has to live with the father. The mother can't have unsupervised contact." The family immediately complies.
3. DCF never gets information that the family isn't complying, but three days later, they show up with cops to remove the child again. They go to the mom's apartment and say, "Where's your kid?" She says, "I don't know. Go next door to dad's building and see if they're there."
Read 36 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(