So it turns out that the Harvard instructor who invited Charles Murray to speak in his class also blogs under a pseudonym and... it's pretty much exactly what you'd expect...
Most of his posts involve him offering an in-depth commentary about events at Williams College, where he graduated from in 1988 but doesn't seem to have any current affiliation...
Here he is mocking a "Diversity, Inclusion, Race Equity" meeting
And here he is, wondering "why Identity Evropa is unacceptable at Williams while, say, Black Lives Matter and BDS are OK. All three organizations have problematic, even hateful, members."
Reminder: Identity Evropa is a white supremacist group.
(Once again, I must remind you: This was written by a *middle-aged man*. Who is, for some reason, blogging about his undergraduate alma mater.)
I don't really care about this guy's personal political views. But by inviting Charles Murray as a visiting speaker for a class on *how to analyze data*, I think it's clear that he is choosing to indulge his own political preferences at the expense of student learning.
One more to add to the list: David Kane, writing under his pseudonym, linked to an article about racial IQ differences on the white supremacist website VDARE, saying "[i]t is the best overview of the issues involved with this topic that I could find".
While the VDARE link is now dead, based on the comments it appears to be a post by Steve Sailer.
Steve Sailer is a white supremacist.
VDARE is a white supremacist website. This is an example of the type of posts you are likely to find there:
David Kane has been embarrassing Harvard for over a decade! In 2006 he wrote a post which had to be removed from the @IQSS website due to errors. In 2007 he wrote a paper that made basic statistical errors.
In April 2022, Russian hackers leaked a cache of 22,000 emails from a network of encrypted Protonmail accounts, including ex-MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove.
The emails were uploaded to a site with the domain name "sneakystrawhead" – apparently a reference to Boris Johnson's typically unkempt hairstyle...
A group of hard-right Brexiteers, including a former head of MI6, secretly attacked a top science journal after their debunked paper on an "alternative" Covid vaccine was rejected.
From @ComputerWeekly & @BylineTimes, this is a MUST READ 👇
This piece raises serious questions about the conduct of Sir Richard Dearlove, the former head of MI6 who is best known for his role in the intelligence failures surrounding the Iraq war.
In the early stages of the pandemic, Dearlove began collaborating with a group of scientists who claimed to have proof that the Covid pandemic was the result of a lab leak.
Mansfield's in-depth ethnographic work has given him an unmatched insight into the inner lives of Women. #Mansfieldat90
While feminist scholars pointed to spousal inequalities in domestic work, Mansfield's meticulous research allowed him to uncover previously unacknowledged contributions of men to the running of a household.
In 2021, Harvard apologized to Terry Karl and many others who were sexually harassed by Jorge Domínguez, acknowledging "institutional failures".
At the same time, Harvard was doing the exact same thing to the complainants in the Comaroff case!
And that's not the only overlap...
Jorge Domínguez had been director of the @HarvardWCFIA from 1996 - 2006, a position that allowed him to exert considerable power over funding opportunities.
John Comaroff is affiliated with the Weatherhead Center, as are (by my count) 22 of the 38 signatories to the open letter.
Of course, it's not exactly surprising that many social science faculty are affiliated with one of the main centers for social science research.
But several of the signatories hold (or held) leadership positions, not just affiliations.
Adding new links to the map each week is depressing, but one silver lining is seeing a coalition of journalists, lawyers, academics, and citizens come together to expose this government's corruption.
"I thought, I need a side project that's going to keep me occupied, something useful, that's nothing to do with Trump."
Q: Why does cronyism matter?
A: The idea that we created a ‘VIP lane’ for politically-connected firms goes against every set of anti-corruption best practices that's ever been written. By creating that system, the government incentivised all kinds of opportunistic behaviour.