This is the best summary I've seen so far of the PA "discarded ballots" story. Appears plausibly at least partly a consequence of PA's strict court-imposed rules requiring "naked ballots" to be discarded. washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/…
Whatever happened, an important lesson of this story for voters is to read and follow the instructions for returning ballots very carefully. There's more to it than just sticking the ballot in an envelope and mailing it!
Also, it appears that the ballots in question were all from military voters, in which case they might have been on a national "generic" all-write-in ballot called the FWAB. FWAB ballots are a different format from county-printed mail-in ballots, increasing chances for confusion.
FWABs speed up getting ballots to overseas voters (since they don't have to be mailed from the home county). But they require different processing on receipt. So it's a tradeoff intended to solve a difficult problem that's historically disenfranchised military voters..
Here's a link to the FWAB form. Note that the same form can be used as either or both a ballot or an absentee ballot request form. It's a rather confusing document for both voters and the officials who receive them. fvap.gov/uploads/FVAP/F…
Since the DoJ and admin officials are describing the ballots in question as “military ballots” that had Trump “written in” I think it’s safe to conclude that these were FWAB ballots. (There’s no other special ID'd military ballot and Trump isn’t a write-in candidate anywhere.)
In any case, any allegation of mishandled ballots absolutely should be investigated, but the facts that have emerged so far in this case suggest either improperly sealed ballots or a fairly routine processing error rather than deliberate malice.
Note by the way that the FWAB is a completely uncontrolled document. Anyone can download it off the Internet. The validity checks occur when completed ballots are received. It's another example of how, despite what the president says, blank ballots aren't particularly sensitive.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Radio nerditry: Yes, I've heard that KrakenRF pulled their passive radar code, and no, I'm not looking forward to revisiting ITAR after all these years.
There isn't, as far as I can tell, enough publicly-known information about the facts here to even speculate about whether this is an easily-resolved misunderstanding, over-caution, or a serious concern. I can imagine ways it could be any of the three. Hopefully not the latter.
Cryptography in the US, even open source software, used to be (and to a limited extent, still is) regulated under ITAR. It was a big attenuator on open research. But because different countries interpreted ITAR for cryptography differently, it wasn't as bad as it could be here.
Unpopular and uncomfortable election integrity reality: While BS about "hacked elections" has been most loudly amplified by the Right in the US, they have no monopoly on it. This nonsense was mostly started by (and continues to be spread by) marginal activists on the Left.
Two difficult-to-reconcile truths about US election integrity. Any serious discussion of the subject must acknowledge both of them:
- There genuinely are some real vulnerabilities in some of our election infrastructure
- There's no evidence an election outcome has been hacked.
Whatever your political preferences, asserting than an election as been hacked is an EXTRAORDINARY claim, requiring compelling evidence. If someone makes such a claim, demand evidence.
The remedy for BS is truth, not equal-and-opposite BS.
Even if it taxes your patience, being careful and following procedures in tallying votes is not evidence of fraud. In fact, it's the opposite of that.
"Isn't it suspicious that it's only tight races that are undecided?"
No. That's exactly what we'd expect.
Any "winners" reported so far are media projections from partial tallies released so far. The closer the race, the higher the % of votes cast they need to project a winner.
Very few jurisdictions across the US have reported 100% tallies in any races yet, and even those are still unofficial, uncertified results. State laws can delay full results until well after election day; in some, mail-in votes can't start to be processed until after polls close.
Any Twitter engineer being asked to certify compliance to a regulatory agency (such as the FTC) should seek independent (their own) legal advice before signing anything or making any statement to regulators.
This is a bus you do NOT want to be thrown under.
I can't emphasize how perilous this can be. "Self-certification of compliance" with an FTC consent decree might be presented as merely routine paperwork, no big deal.
No. It's a big deal, and if you're even thinking about agreeing to this, you need competent legal advice first.
As election results start to come in this week, some losing candidates and supporters may claim that their election was "rigged" or "hacked". To sort fact from fiction, you have to understand how elections actually work. Here's a great reference: nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25120/…
A large fraction of “stop the steal” mis- and disinformation was OBVIOUS BS to those who understood the basics of election logistics, and tech. But it could sound convincing to the uninitiated. Learn how your local elections work, especially how ballots are handled and counted.
And many aspects of elections vary across states and counties. For example, in some places, for procedural and technical reasons, mail-in ballots aren’t processed until AFTER the polls close. If the number of those ballots is large, it can take a while before results are known.
I've been using Mastodon for a couple days now. A couple (nonexpert) observations
The system as a whole functions. The major servers (that you're likely to sign up for) federate with each other, which means you can, in principle, follow and be followed just about anywhere. 1/
However, the system is clearly (and unsurprisingly) also straining under the newfound load right.
Many servers are closed to new signups, so you have to look for one that will take you, which may not be where most of your friends are. That's OK (see above), except that... 2/
... likely because of the load, timelines across different server instances are often a bit of a mess - out of order, slow to update, duplicate posts, etc. So it doesn't always feel like Twitter. Sometimes more like Twitter if the tweets were delivered by actual carrier pigeons.