Amy Swearer Profile picture
Sep 25, 2020 10 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Earlier this week, I spent over an hour in line [on a weeknight, in a dress, during a pandemic] in order to pay my final respects to the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Yes, I often vehemently disagreed with her.

But this is a THREAD on the respect I have for her, anyway. ImageImageImage
I am fully aware that the first woman on SCOTUS was Sandra Day O'Connor, not RBG. But in many respects, O'Connor was "before my time." She retired from the bench when I was in grade school. It was RBG, rather, who stood prominent before me as a woman pursuing a career in law.
And despite all the differences in our respective legal philosophies, Justice Ginsburg and women like her not only paved my way, but sometimes cut down trees to clear a path that didn't initially exist.
Where law schools recruited me, Justice Ginsburg dealt with a dean who would dare look her straight in the face and imply her spot should have gone to a man.

Where I know my career wouldn't be in jeopardy should I start a family, RBG hid her pregnancy until tenure was assured.
She was denied a clerkship because of her gender. She was paid less than her male colleagues. Both the law and society treated her differently because she was a woman.

She had the courage to take them on. To change them.

And I have benefitted immensely because of it.
You see, when I first started pursuing a career in law, it wasn't just a matter of, "Oh, well, if RBG can do it, so can I."

No. Because of Justice Ginsburg and many women like her, it simply never occurred to me that I couldn't.
Not once did I have to question whether there was a job I could not hold, a career I could pursue, or a position I could not attain because of my gender.

Why?

Because there was Ruth Bader Ginsburg not just on the bench, but everywhere. On mugs, on shirts, on memes.
She was everywhere, and she was THERE. On the highest court. And there was nothing I could not be.

And no matter how many times I internally ranted at her opinions, I was reading HER famous dissents in MY casebook.

And there was no one with whom I could not also dissent.
Then I would see her friendship with Justice Scalia.

And there was no one with whom I could not also be friends.
There will be time enough to talk about the woman who will fill her seat - and yes, it will be a woman.

But for now, as Ruth Bader Ginsburg becomes the the first woman to lie in state at the Capitol, I will look at her remarkable life...and I will know that she made mine better.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Amy Swearer

Amy Swearer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AmySwearer

Oct 3
A defenseless Detroit woman was kidnapped and raped by her abusive/stalker ex-boyfriend just one day before she was set to take her state-mandated course for a concealed carry permit.

fox2detroit.com/news/detroit-p…
We only know about this because her failure to show up for the class tipped off that something was wrong, and ended up being key to getting police involved in finding and rescuing her. So the article mentions it in passing. God knows how often it happens but isn't mentioned.
GUYS. Last month this absolute trash fire of a human picked this woman's car lock, hid in her trunk for hours, and CRAWLED OUT OF HER TRUNK while she was driving. And that's after he snuck into her building and lured her to open her door so he could try to force his way inside.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 17
Since the NYT wouldn't dare allow a response op-ed to this, I'll settle for response tweet thread. Buckle up.

nytimes.com/2024/09/16/opi…
The interesting part about the last sentence is that it's so particularly true in the case of the Tucson shooting that it undermines the argument it's just "about the guns." Loughner was both an abuser of illegal substances, as well as clearly mentally ill and dangerous, and everyone knew it. His parents were incredibly worried about it. At the insistence of police, they took away his shotgun. On their own initiative, they kept disabling his car at night so that he couldn't easily leave. But the state never took action to ensure he couldn't just buy a new gun, which he did. His parents never really pushed the issue about a mental health evaluation (though I'm not unsympathetic to the difficulties of forcing your adult son to do anything). It's not that he fell into some grey area where there wasn't anything anyone could do under existing mental health frameworks - he should have been a clear candidate for involuntary inpatient commitment. Of all mass shooters, Loughner's stands out with the Parkland shooter as one of the most clear cut cases of "holy cow why did no one ever officially follow up or intervene." And that's not actually a story about guns. It's a story about our mental health system, where people who are clearly schizophrenic and dangerous are allowed to spiral sans appropriate intervention until they reach a point of acute crisis.Image
No, respectfully, the through lines are 100% the heated political rhetoric and the Secret Service's abject failures. Without those factors, the guns are utterly irrelevant to the equation. Guns in vacuum are just an object. The political rhetoric and security failures create the context in which a person desires to and is capable of using that tool for horrific purposes.

Unrelated - it's both weird and very telling that she reduces her characterization of the guns down to just "semiautomatic weapons." Not "weapons of war" or "assault-style weapons." No, the baddie here is basically every modern firearm. Normally they aren't so brazen in saying the quiet part out loud, but we're definitely seeing it more often.Image
Read 10 tweets
Jan 18
I'm reading through the DOJ's scathing report on the disastrous Uvalde response so that you don't have to.

Here's what sticks out: 🧵

static.texastribune.org/media/files/17…
The investigation "identified several critical failures and other breakdowns" during the response and refers to "cascading failures of leadership, decision-making, tactics, policy, and training that contributed to those failures and breakdowns."
The most significant failure? First responders treated a clear active shooter scenario--where generally accepted practice is to "immediately engage the subject...if necessary, bypassing injured victims and placing themselves in harm's way"--as a barricaded subject scenario.
Read 16 tweets
Aug 14, 2023
Can we take a minute to appreciate how many women have protected themselves and others with firearms in the last two or so weeks? It's basically a highlight real of just how important the right to keep and bear arms is for us, too. Tip of the DGU iceberg, but important:

📜📜📜
Aug. 11, Tucson (AZ) - A woman living by herself fatally shot a would-be intruder who kept trying to break into her home despite knowing she was armed.

kold.com/2023/08/12/pcs…
Aug. 11, Pottstown (PA) - A woman shot and wounded the father of her child after he assaulted her, leaving various injuries. He not only had an active restraining order against him, but also had active warrants for violating that restraining order.

archive.ph/mP2Rh
Read 15 tweets
Jul 21, 2023
(1) She was 30 weeks pregnant, which would have been illegal in most states pre-Roe [and most of the world], and is 20 weeks past the FDA's approved usage timeline for abortion pills.

(2) She wasn't charged under the abortion law. She was charged with concealing the remains.
(3) Her mother is charged with *performing* the abortion after 20 weeks, as well as with performing the abortion without a medical license.

(4) Doctors lose their licenses all the time for far less egregious things than prescribing abortion pills at 30 weeks.
(5) Survival rates for babies born at 30 weeks are somewhere between 95-98% in developed countries. The baby has vocal chords, fingerprints, fully developed lungs, and even eyelashes. It can open its eyes and blink. It can grasp the umbilical cord with its tiny hands.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 27, 2023
It's indisputable that an armed civilian stopped an active shooter last week.

You almost certainly haven't heard about it.

Why?

Because Las Vegas Police have gone out of their way to downplay it, while the media have shown basically zero interest.

THREAD.
Last Friday, LVPD responded to a shooting at a luxury condo just off the Las Vegas strip. The initial reporting on it looked generally like this:

Two people involved. One shot and injured.

That's it. Pretty standard crime, right?

8newsnow.com/news/local-new…
The next day, some follow up reports started hinting that something more complex may have happened.

We find out that a "gunman" fired shots into the apartment complex lobby, and was "stopped" by a hero employee.

ktnv.com/news/man-calle…
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(