A firm specialising in vitamin boosts that hired Boris Johnson's half-brother hoping he can "open doors" is holding talks with Government about Covid testing, which we know (only because of leaks) Govt plans to spend over £100bn on. mirror.co.uk/news/politics/…
We at @GoodLawProject have four judicial reviews afoot against inexplicable procurement decisions Government has made and is about to launch a further three, including one against the £100bn+ Moonshot programme. Those judicial reviews share some alarming features.
Government has failed to put any of the contracts out to open tender so we can check on how it is spending public money. It has, contrary to its own guidance, refused to publish the contracts and, contrary to the law, details of the contracts.
A number of these contracts - even without publication I am currently aware of six but there are almost certainly many more - have been entered into privately with long time associates of Dominic Cummings.
In each of the judicial reviews we have brought Govt argues we cannot challenge its actions because we do not have standing. I have sworn a witness statement explaining the many conversations I have had with businesses who fear commercial reprisals if they challenge Government.
In the one judicial review we have so far brought against Govt for secretly entering into a contract with Cummings' associate - we expect to bring another next week and this is true of that further judicial review - Govt has not even attempted to argue its actions were lawful.
I have correspondence from serious people - senior academics, business people and lawyers - making allegations I consider plausible of price gouging and corruption including, in respect of a very valuable contract, an explicit demand for a bribe.
I have worked hard to put this material into the public domain - and the person responsible for the price gouging allegation is talking to a journalist I introduced him to - but those who come to me are very fearful of what will happen to them if their name emerges.
I also speak privately to senior current and ex-civil servants, some of whom work in highly respected think tanks, who share my alarm about what is happening in Government but prefer not to go public with their fears.
On the £100bn+ Moonshot programme - more below - widely pilloried by the scientific community Government says the project is both (1) too urgent for open tender but (2) insufficiently urgency for it to need to respond in accordance with court timetables. crowdjustice.com/case/operation…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Labour caving to some of the richest people in the country - whilst raising the tax burden on employing the low paid - has been described as the "lobbying coup of the decade."
But how bad is it? 🧵
Well, we know that Labour promised to raise £565m per annum from taxing private equity properly. But, after lobbying, agreed only to raise 14% of that or £80m.
But in fact, it's worse that that (or better, if you are amongst that mega rich class).
For a particular type of carried interest Labour actually proposes to *cut* tax rates...
Three reasons why inheritance tax on farmland is a good thing (beyond the obvious - that it will raise money). 🧵
First, farmland being subject to inheritance tax will reduce the value it has as a token to pass wealth down tax free between generations, so that farmland is cheaper and farming more profitable.
Second, farmland being subject to inheritance tax will reduce the number of people who hold it as a token to pass wealth down tax free between generations so it is instead held by people who hold it to farm it so it is more efficiently used.
I see my tweets about the effects of Wes Streeting's ban on puberty blockers on younger trans people have been criticised by the DHSC’s adviser on suicides. 🧵
1. What is undoubtedly true is that Victoria Atkins was warned by her own civil servants about the ban on puberty blockers posing “a high risk of self-harm and suicide” and Wes Streeting followed his predecessor in ignoring that advice.
2. Before publishing my thread (below) we went to the Tavistock and Portman with these numbers for a response. Other journalists went to NHS England for a response. Neither denied the numbers and both declined to comment.
Medically, not much will change. The NHS has not prescribed PBs for years. And now families will travel abroad to collect the drugs they know their children need. Streeting can make it less safe for everyone, and impose huge sacrifices on poorer families, but he cannot stop this.
Politically, I can't recall ever feeling this depressed. When the Tories did this cruel ideological act there was hope, for they would soon be out. Now Streeting is doing worse and it feels like there is none. Personally I am finding it *very* hard to assimilate this.
There are widespread rumours (and some evidence) of more to come and inferentially what Streeting is saying is that he will not engage with the trans community or listen to warnings from civil servants or the NHS and he will not engage with suicide data.
Second, given that the structure of the ban recognises the risks to of cutting off puberty blockers for those already prescribed them by the NHS, what steps have you taken to ensure those prescribed puberty blockers privately can continue to access them?