A Facebook exec argues the msg is just more visceral: "Right wing populism is always more engaging...Nation, protection, the other, anger, fear. That was there in the 30s. That's not invented by social media"
The Biden campaign blasted Facebook for this explanation. @BillR "Facebook's platform is a mirror alright — a fun house mirror. One that has twisted and distorted our world and our politics...It is a choice to create an algorithm that feeds the distrust and polarization..."
The FB exec said the left's frustration is also social media reflecting a dynamic rather than creating it
"All center-left campaigners & politicians always ask themselves, ‘Why can't [we] seem to rile their supporters as much as right-wing populists have?’”
full quote
FB points out that engagement ≠ impressions and argues this is a small fraction of what ppl see (they say they're working on making that data public).
But on engagement, FB is dominated by right-wing voices outside the mainstream: Dan Bongino, David Harris Jr., Blue Live Matter
.@The_DailyWire is at the top.
It was the most engaged w/ news site on all of Facebook in July and August. @benshapiro's page is also dominant.
In the past 90 days, it has 175 million engagements compared to just 27 million for The New York Times per @crowdtangle
When liberals complain about FB/2016, conservatives often counter that Dems didn't have any problems w/ the company in 2012 w/ Obama's ppl
Facebook would "sigh and say, ‘You can do this as long as you stop doing it on Nov. 7,’” an Obama official told the NYT in 2013.
some people pointed out the that "1930's" quote wasn't in the piece. That was just a late night back-and-forth edits slip-up. It is back in the story now. politico.com/news/2020/09/2…
Former Facebook employee who was an embed for the Trump 2016 campaign and working for the Dems this cycle ->
another bit on this.
There are two partisan battles on Facebook right now. This article is about organic content/earned social media.
But the paid media battle is also fierce/pricey
Trump camp has spent over $109 million on FB ads since 2018
Biden over $64 million
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Operatives in both parties instantly saw it as a flashback to Hillary Clinton's "basket of deplorables" remark.
The Trump team has already started to fundraise off it, sending out an email with the subject line: "You are not garbage! I love you! You are the best our nation has to offer."
Biden's comments are the latest example of why Kamala Harris' team has been avoiding campaigning with him.
Biden is both unpopular and undisciplined, Harris aides told Axios.
After Slotkin retreats from EV’s in a new ad this week, Harris told people in Michigan yesterday: "Contrary to what my opponent is suggesting, I will never tell you what kind of car you have to drive.”
Some more context in this piece.
In 2019, Harris backed a plan requiring all automakers to only make EV’s and hydrogen cars by 2035.
New: In an Aug. 28 letter obtained by Axios, the WH News Photographers Association said Harris' team was engaging in an "unprecedented reduction in access.”
The VP’s team didn’t respond until last night after we asked about the letter
Jessica Koscielniak, the president of the WHNPA, wrote to Harris' top aides last month protesting that "the four independent news photographer seats have been downgraded to one."
She proposed either adding a "chaser plane" for additional media or the WHCA reorganizing who gets a seat.
In their response last night, the VP’s office said they explored adding more seats on Air Force Two and a chase plane and "learned both suggestions are not viable given available resources, including personnel and aircraft."
The full VP response below:
Veteran WH news photographer Doug Mills, speaking in his personal capacity, told Axios that "the current situation puts the still photographers at a distinct disadvantage on every trip."
He added: "It's essential to us for people to understand the importance of having a full photographer pool. Every photographer sees each event differently. "
As Senator, Harris co-sponsored the Zero-Emissions Act in 2019, which would require by 2040 that 100% of new passenger vehicle sales in the U.S. release no greenhouse gases (only EV’s and hydrogen cars fit that criteria).
During her 2020 campaign, she advocated for an “accelerated model” of the bill and proposed requiring "50% of all new passenger vehicles sold are zero-emission by 2030, and 100% are zero-emission by 2035."
This was what Harris proposed on her 2020 website.
"we will ensure that 50 percent of all new passenger vehicles sold are zero-emission by 2030, and 100 percent are zero-emission by 2035. This will require a new and improved “cash for clunkers” program with incentives for cars to be replaced with zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) manufactured in America" web.archive.org/web/2019120323…
New: The good vibes Harris's campaign are masking tensions among competing factions, as Harris loyalists and Obama alumni are grafted onto Biden's campaign.
“The entanglement of these different entities has led to many people feeling a real lack of role clarity," one person involved in the campaign told Axios.
The result is a large and at times unwieldy team, with internal worries about cohesiveness when inevitable stumbles arise, 6 people involved in the campaign tell Axios.
Biden's campaign was insular, with a few long-serving aides making big decisions.
The Harris campaign has become a diffuse "Frankenstein" team with multiple power centers of ppl close to Harris, some on the Biden team, and the new Obama folks.