Robert Fruchtman Profile picture
Sep 26, 2020 45 tweets 12 min read Read on X
Hello San Francisco. I'm attending a Housing Element 2022 Update hosted by SF Planning.
There will be more events in other languages in the next few days.
A mental health hotline is available for those who need it.
Staff will share an overview of the SF housing element and listen to feedback from participants.
Zoom registration links

Today: zoom.us/meeting/regist…

Spanish language meeting (Sep 29): zoom.us/meeting/regist…

Chinese language meeting (Sep 30): zoom.us/meeting/regist…
Kimia Haddadan from Planning: SF's next housing plan will center racial equity. This is a 2-year process which started in June. Strategy is to meet people where they are in town halls, neighborhood events, and community organizations. This meeting is for all San Franciscans.
Malena Leon-Farrera from SF Planning acknowledging the history of SF as Ohlone land
Malena: Housing element is mandated by state law every 8 years so we can receive affordable housing funds from the state. It also represents our values.
Planning has compiled feedback from various initiatives over the years. "We don't start from scratch for each plan."
Themes for this housing element update:

• Racial and social equity
• Minimum displacement
• Housing choice for all, in all neighborhoods
• Neighborhoods resilient to climate and health crises
The Planning Commission recently passed a resolution apologized for racial inequity in previous plans. They will focus on correcting this in future plans.
State law also requires that environmental justice and fair housing be advanced by this housing element.
Malena presenting a redlining map from the 30s: Redlined neighborhoods were deemed high-risk, frequently homed to Black residents. It was difficult for those residents to obtain loans. Today, these areas have high rates of COVID-19, police violence, and poverty.
We can create policies for the housing element which advance racial equity, such as distributing housing throughout the City and investing in communities of color
BIPOC populations are more vulnerable to high housing costs.
This chart chows the displacement of certain populations in the last 30 years. BIPOC groups have been most vulnerable to displacement.
Unemployment from COVID-19 disproportionately affects BIPOC and low-income households
Some policy ideas for protecting vulnerable communities
Malena: "San Francisco's current zoning code makes [affordable housing] more difficult to be built in over 60% of residential parcels," especially on the west side
Policy ideas for building homes in the west side
Environmental issues like air qualities, earthquakes can harm neighborhoods and are important to consider
Policy ideas for promoting sustainable, livable, and resilient neighborhoods
Participation is crucial because policy and legislation are effective tools to enact community-demanded changes
We're now covering ground rules for the listening activity. Planning staff will try to transcribe people's comments and capture the essence of their comments. They are also looking for input on what ideas people agree with.
First speaker was able to buy a BMR unit 17 years ago: City doesn't monitor units very well. I know of many times where people qualify who shouldn't. Many in my building rent their homes for profit. Refinancing is a huge issue. Stairs in my home won't always be accessible.
Anastasia Yovanopoulos from Livable California: Planning Department has competing policies between preserving affordable housing and increasing density. LLCs buy up cheap units and then try to make a profit on the backs of tenants.
Yovanopoulos: Sometimes developers present plans which sound like ghettos. Renovation project sponsors should declare under penalty of perjury if tenants are present in the building. The tenants must not be ignored and must have rights stay in their homes.
Next speaker: I'm a renter. I love the idea of housing choice. We need a housing abundance. Renters need leverage with their landlords. We can do that by building more housing, especially in high resource areas.
Speaker: Downzoning in the 70s has prevented that. We need housing in the Marina, Pac Heights, Russian Hill, etc. We should shift the housing supply to areas not at risk of gentrification.
First speaker: BMR owners should be allowed to move into a different BMR space that meets their needs. Program users need flexibility based on their needs. City should do home visits to make sure BMR residents are not illegally subletting units.
Another Livable California member, Kathy Howard: It's important that the city preserve open space. People and wildlife need it—not just in parks, but in backyards. Wealthy people are leaving SF to get more open space. The plans I see are for poor people to live in denser homes
Howard: We should consider preserving single-family homes for housing, and then provide financial support to low-income families so they can enjoy their own homes. "Cities don't all have to be chock-a-block-a apartments."
Next speaker: Most affordable housing is existing housing. I know there's free market, but the city is trying to change zoning laws to increase height and density to bring units online when there are units—they're vacant. I don't know how we would check for that, though.
Contd: there are tens of thousands of entitled units. They're not being built for whatever reason. It's very expensive. We need to focus on what we can build in existing capacity—not throwing up an 8-story building in a community because they can.
George Wooding: Planning never goes to look at buildings for inspections. That task gets turned over the Department of Building Inspections, which is corrupt. It looks like Planning is going to become ADU-centric due to state law. People are not building ADUs—too expensive.
I gave some input on how SF doesn't house its own workforce.
Next speaker: We need more senior housing and more multi-family housing. People can't leave their homes or move because they don't see a path forward. And we need more navigation centers. The west side shouldn't be able to keep their communities exclusive.
Next speaker: The areas in the city with the lowest density are the wealthiest in the city. They don't need protection from the free market. San Francisco needs hundreds of thousands of units over the next decade or two.
We're now doing a poll.
Poll results for first question. I missed capturing the second, but most popular options were building market-rate and affordable housing, supporting ADUs, and building multi-unit apartment buildings.
Kimia: There will be more outreach, as well as an environmental impact report. We are trying to reach everyone we can, especially people who have not been typically involved in our outreach.
They posted poll results again. Here are the results for the second poll question.
That's it for me. Thanks for reading.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robert Fruchtman

Robert Fruchtman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_fruchtose

Feb 24
Hello San Francisco. I'm attending a community meeting for 633 Arguello, a housing project being proposed using the newly minted Constraints Reduction Act. The meeting is also being held at 633 Arguello. Toby Morris, the architect, is presenting in a hybrid format. Image
The project sponsor is an owner-builder-developer who wants to demolish a duplex to build a fourplex. Morris says the mayor is trying to expedite housing in some areas. Mayor wants to encourage development to remove Planning Commission hearings for "this very kind of project" Image
Further, the project takes advantage of Supervisor Mandelman's fourplex bill in an RM-2 zoning district. The project will be a side lot line to side lot line 40 ft building w/ flats.
Read 23 tweets
Dec 14, 2023
Hello San Francisco. I'm attending a meeting of the SF Board of Appeals. I am here for an absolutely wild case in which it looks like the City is quite definitely violating the Housing Accountability Act: 1228 Funston St. Image
A very brief summary: The case involves a permit to legalize an unauthorized unit, add an ADU + horizontal addition, and change the façade. SF Planning initiated a Discretionary Review of this permit application. The Planning Commission then imposed conditions on the permit... Image
...but it gets a lot more complicated than that. RoDBIGO Santos is involved. This case has stretched on for years. Multiple permits have been filed. Multiple discretionary reviews (DR) are involved.
Image
Image
Read 143 tweets
Nov 29, 2023
I have found HCD's corrective action letter to San Francisco. Some quick thoughts. Image
The first page of the letter says SF has failed to implement required actions 1.2, 1.4, and 1.10 from Housing Policy and Practice Review. SF has also failed to implement housing element action 8.4.5 by July 31. Relevant text attached here.


Image
Image
Image
Image
On action 8.4.5, HCD seems to be taking the date in the action at face value. I had interpreted the deadline to be January 31, 2024, due to a drafting error. But the housing element adopted by SF includes a separate timeline column not included in the modified general plan text. Image
Read 22 tweets
Jul 27, 2023
Hello San Francisco. I'm attending a Board of Appeals hearing for an appeal of the Planning Department's proposed amendment to the Planning Code that would stop the 2700 Sloat housing project—a.k.a. the Sunset Tower. Image
Teague says this project started as a HOME-SF project [local density bonus program] originally, and it's not anymore.

Teague confirms that the issue is related to the interpretation of Planning Code sections 102 and 270.
Commissioner Trasviña wants to confirm that the public will have more opportunities to appeal a relevant project in the future.

President Swig says there could be "any number of forks in the road" for the direction of this project and paths to appeal it.
Read 97 tweets
May 25, 2023
Hello San Francisco, I'm at the Park Branch Library attending a pre-application meeting for a housing project at…hold, what's this address? 1846 Grove St? Is that…? Image
Yes, it's the same project that was cut in half from four units to two by Supervisor Preston at a Board of Supervisors appeal hearing!

Troy, the architect, is introducing the project. He and his partners bought the lot in 2017. In 2018 they proposed five homes, but after meeting with neighbors they made it four.
Read 39 tweets
Nov 15, 2022
Good afternoon, San Francisco. I am attending a hearing at the Board of Supervisors on the 2022 housing element update. Supervisor Mar says, "I expect this to be a long hearing." He called for the hearing along with Supervisor Melgar and Supervisor Stefani.
Mar says it's critical that we pass a compliant housing element to keep millionds of $$$ in affordable housing and local control. "The gauntlet the state has thrown our way is immense, but I'm confident we'll rise to the ocassion."
Mar says that the failures of Prop D and Prop E mean that "we cannot get this consensus by fighting each other."
Read 173 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(