On the risks of a second wave - what can we learn from other countries experience?
The evidence is mixed and between-country comparison have lots of limitations so you can come to different conclusions based on which countries you look at. However, generally it is true that
those countries experiencing larger second waves after lifting lockdowns are those that had smaller first waves so more of their population remain susceptible to infection. But it is not true that the second waves are only causing cases and not deaths eg Israel, Romania, Morocco
The converse is also true (so far) in that countries with large first waves are having smaller second waves, and particularly in cities like New York where 20 per cent of the population has developed antibodies, there is no second wave yet. This was surprising as it was expected
that herd immunity would develop at a minimum of around 50 per cent of the population being infected, but there is now some evidence that many more people are immune as they have developed immunity from other parts of the immune system (T-cells, IgA antibodies)
- or from previous infection with common cold coronaviruses - and this is not detected by routine antibody testing.
However, there is an exception to this experience: Iran – where a large first wave of deaths has been followed by an even larger second wave (despite 20 per cent of its population being infected in the first wave), and so we can’t be that confident as to what will happen here
in the UK, but only 7-8% have positive antibodies on testing so we are a long way from 20% anyway.
In general, second waves started three months after the first (therefore too early to know if Sweden will have one) but we can see what is happening in Spain and France.
Our second wave started about a month ago, and hospitalisations (shown below) and deaths - the key metrics - have now also started increasing but at a much lower rate than in the first wave. More on this tomorrow.
With restrictions having ended across all home nations, it’s time to have a look at the results of the 'natural experiment' that we've had in the UK since July 19 when policies diverged with England having fewer restrictions than Wales, Scotland & Northern Ireland since then.
1/6
While some described England’s approach as a "dangerous & unethical experiment", @CMO_England, I & others thought that ongoing restrictions in a highly immune population would simply postpone infections - not prevent them.
So what has happened with infection & death rates?
2/6
The graphs below show cumulative infections & deaths across the home nations from July 19 to April 9 (last date data available) & also from December 17 to April 9 when Omicron became dominant and show no significant differences in infection or death rates over that time. 3/6
Studies like these (based on models) ignore what is now well-established i.e. key role of voluntary behaviour change in controlling Covid - with behaviour changing more in response to the level/fear of Covid ('voluntary lockdown') than govt. mandates 1/7 telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/04/1…
e.g. household visiting & mobility fell more in the week before lockdown than after lockdown came in. There is limited evidence that the govt. mandate produced a bigger fall than that which occurred anyway & we know that compliance with mandates is associated with level of risk
And we also saw what happened with the Omicron wave in December when, contrary to what was widely predicted based on models, voluntary behaviour changes led to an outcome similar to what was projected to happen with lockdown equivalent to step 2 of roadmap (only schools open.)
With hospital admissions in England approaching the 1st Omicron peak (& hospitals being busier overall due to more non-Covid patients) & ONS likely to show a record no. infections this week, some are again calling for a return of mandatory measures assuming this will help but
1/6
evidence for this is lacking.
In the absence of better evidence, we look at the real world data from the natural experiment we've had since July 19 when the home nations diverged & we don't see any indications from the case, death or ONS survey data that England has fared worse
from have less mandates & relying more on public health guidance & people taking personal responsibility.
This is also true for the most recent Omicron wave where Scotland has had the highest infection rates & higher hospitalisations than first peak despite having more mandates.
V. important paper published in the Lancet - the first peer-reviewed global estimates of excess deaths (the most reliable way to compare Covid deaths) over first 2 years of pandemic with findings that will surprise many & correct five widespread misconceptions / assumptions:
1/9
1. Far from the UK having the worst death rate in Europe (or even Western Europe) as many still think, it is actually 29th in Europe & 9th in Western Europe - below the Western European average & at the same level as France & Germany (no statistically significant difference)
A note on excess deaths last wk: 1. They are 8.6% lower when comparing to the 5 yr avg which includes 2021 - unsurprising as it was peak of 2nd wave & no-one fully vaccinated - but 2. More significantly, they are also 3.3% lower than the 5 yr avg. for 2015-19 (pre-pandemic) 1/4
This is a huge contrast to the same week last year when there were 18,676 deaths (about 1.5 times higher than now) and deaths were 41.3% above the five-year average again illustrating the massive impact of vaccines and Omicron's decreased severity (& very low deaths from flu)
2/4
It is also consistent with point I raised in December re. '28 day positive test' measure over-estimating deaths due to Covid with Omicron (as shown below from @AlistairHaimes).
The proportion of 'due to' (72.9%) vs. 'involving' Covid is also lower than previous week (77.4%). 3/4
There is understandable concern about increasing numbers of children being admitted into hospital with a positive Covid test recently. This needs urgent investigation but from what we know so far the data suggests the headline figures may be hiding a more complicated reality:
Firstly, the situation with children is in many ways similar to that with adults in that we need to distinguish between those who are admitted for a Covid-like syndrome versus those who are admitted with another condition (eg. abdominal pain) but have an incidental positive test
(There are also those who are admitted with a condition which Covid may have contributed to - and for the in-hospital figures those who were admitted before and now have a hospital-acquired infection.)