#WeeklyMarx Instalment 7, #GoodMorningMarx Day 48 of Capital v. 1, pp. 299-326. Chp 7 sec 2 partial, Chp 8, Chp 9 sec 1. We have to go back a bit to the start of Chp 7 sec 2: the valorization process. Marx began a universal inquiry into the labor process as the human transmuting
of nature and, being shaped by that dialectical process, implying that each mode of production would have a particularly relationship to ecology. He specified at the end of the section, some features of the labour process under capitalism: 1) the worker gives up control of
organizing one's own labor to the capitalist, 2) gives up ownership of the product of labour and all its use values and value since the capitalist has purchased the labour-power. As we see now in the valorization process that the use value of the commodity of labor-power to the
capitalist is surplus value. Crucial point. Capitalist aims to produce a use-value in a commodity that has value greater than the sum of the values of the commodities used to produce it, the means of production and the labour-power. The goal is to produce value, a surplus value.
Marx introduces the idea that the process of production as a unity is composed of two dimensions of the labour process and that of creating value. He goes into examples to illustrate process of value creation and begins by calculating the objectified labour in the means of
production. There are some questions here about specialized vs general labor here, but Marx insists on the abstract labour time here materialized through the unrest of work into being, motion into objectivity (296). The key, 301, is that the purchase of a day's labour power
exceeds its value when consumed/used by the capitalist and money becomes capital through this process."Every condition of the problem is satisfied while the laws governing the exchange of commodities have not been violated in any way." This resolves the contradictions of being
boht inside and outside the circulation of commodities. It takes place in the sphere of production where value is made by using labour-power, a special commodity. Past labour in objectified form is enlivened through living labour that valorizes it into capital: value which can
"perform its own valorization process, an animated monster which begins to 'work', 'as if its body were by love possessed.'" Valorization is the value making process continued beyond a definite point of equivalent value for the commodity of labour-power. The capitalist makes
sure to organize that process to be efficient, at the standard of what is normally socially necessary. Chp 8 on Constant Capital and Variable Capital elaborates on the labor process. Constant capital is simply the value of all the means of production in the labour process for
production. They are bearers of the past labour but do not create new value which are only transferred by labour which creates value and surplus value but brings forward and conserves the past value that would otherwise be lost. Variable capital can produce new value and
surplus value. These two concepts elaborate on those essentially established in the previous chapters but, according to Harvey, the importance of the discussion is to critique the classical political economists concerned with fixed capital costs advanced in production
vs capital expended in production processes. Part of the value of the constant capital passes into the product, essentially depreciation, as Marx notes. The value transferred might escape calculation of surplus value--he defers until later resolving this complication. But he
uses these two distinctions to formulate the value of the commodity as constant capital (means of production) plus variable capital (labor-power) plus surplus value. The ratio between constant capital and variable capital is an interesting issue and changes according to context:
historically, socially, and technically. Technology vs labour intensive forms--an issue emerges about why would technical innovation happen if labour is where surplus value comes from? Marx will talk about this later. For the time-being the ratio of importance is surplus value
to variable capital (labor). Hence he will turn to the rate of surplus value or "rate of exploitation" in Chp. 9, the subject for next week. We are getting to the heart of it now! Keep reading, comrades! Comment, discuss, share #WeeklyMarx
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As we learned in Chp 13 Co-operation, many hands make light work; many working together produce more than their individual capacity aggregated. It is a social process!
One outcome of that social aspect of the labor process is the increased resistance to the domination of capital and the pressure of capital to overcome this resistance. A despotism of the capitalist. But special kinds of wage-labourers must be developed to manage and control the
labour process of coordinating the army of workers, officers or foremen, like the overseer on the plantation. So the capitalist now without the obvious coercion wields the power that the Pharaoh had of coordinating the coerced labour of so many to produce the wonders of pyramids.
#WeeklyMarx Instalment 6, #GoodMorningMarx Day 41 of Capital v. 1, pgs. 270-298, Chps 6 and most of 7. Crucial concepts of labour-power and surplus value and the valorization process. Follow @weeklymarx and @MorningMarx. Thanks to @PeoplesComic_ for original art! Follow him!
Last instalment 5, rushed chps 4 and 5, so back to the conclusion of chp 5... Marx shows that the surplus value required in capitalist circulation and classical political economic theory cannot be accounted for. He concludes that "surplus-value cannot arise from circulation, and
therefore that, for it to be formed, something must take place in the background which is not visible in the circulation itself." (i.e. not in the theory of market exchange itself). He poses a contradiction--capital cannot arise from circulation and equally cannot apart from it.
#WeeklyMarx Instalment 5, continued in Part 2. 25 tweets in a thread the limit--I'm too wordy! So we will complete Chp 3, 3:c on "World Money" and stop here. Despite nation state monetary systems, these markets are responsive to a world market, so Marx addresses the world
monetary system. Value actually requires the world market for money to realize its function. Marx has set up the structures necessary to understand now in an M-C-M form of circulation how money will be transformed into Capital. He starts this as a new section of v. 1 and chp 4
lays out "the General Formula for Capital." He recapitulates that the circulation of commodities is the starting point of capital, that the production and circulation of them in trade forms the historical conditions in which capital arises from the 16th century, when he dates the
#WeeklyMarx Instalment 5, #GoodMorningMarx Day 35 of Capital v. 1,, pgs. 237-269, Chp 3, sec 3b-c, Chp 4, Chp 5. So much to cover here since we stopped at p. 209 in instalment 4 with Marx forecasting the possibility of crises in the capitalist economy because of contradictions
arising in his analysis of the circulation of commodities even in a perfectly functioning market according to the conceptions of the liberal political economists he is critiquing, namely Smith, Ricardo and those following Say's law that posits because every sale is a purchase and
every purchase a sale that an equilibrium would exist between producers and consumers. But Marx was showing in the previous section how there was no requirement that the seller spend the money realized in the sale of the commodity... He will discuss the conditions later that
#WeeklyMarx Instalment 4, #GoodMorningMarx Day 35 of Capital v. 1,, pgs. 209-236, Chp 3, sec 2b-part 3b. Now we delve into chp 3, the start of which we skipped last week, so we start from p. 188, the beginning of Chp 3: Money, or the Circulation of Commodities. A day late, sorry!
Will try to catch up to #GoodMorningMarx reading schedule by next week! Sec 1 "the Measure of Values" establishes that gold, as the standard money commodity, acts as a material for equating values as different magnitudes of the same substance, as a universal measure of
value. That is what transforms gold as a commodity into money. Money "as a measure of value is the necessary form of appearance of the measure of value which is immanent in commodities, namely labour-time." The money form or price is the expression of the value of a commodity in
#WeeklyMarx Instalment 3, #GoodMorningMarx Day 28 of Capital v. 1, pgs.181-208, Chps 2, 3 sec 1-2a. Last week Marx developed exchange value, the origin of money, and the secret of the commodity fetish. This week, we summarize his initial discussion of the process of exchange.
Chp 2 begins by postulating that to understand that commodities are exchanged in the market through social and legal agreements depending on the mutual recognition of possession as private property--recognizing guardians of commodities as owners and commodities as alienable.
He is setting up in this chapter his mammoth chp 3 discussion of "money, or the circulation of commodities." So he clarifies that his abstract characterization of buyers and sellers etc..., is as a personification of economic relations.