“In 2018, for example, Mr. Trump announced in his disclosure that he had made at least $434.9 million. The tax records deliver a very different portrait of his bottom line: $47.4 million in losses.” nytimes.com/interactive/20…
“At Mar-a-Lago... new members starting in 2015 allowed him to pocket an additional $5 million a year... At his Doral golf resort... manufacturer GAF spent at least $1.5 million in 2018 even as its industry was lobbying the Trump administration to roll back... regulations.”
In other words, the tax documents show the president bringing in significant profits related to his position, while still reporting enormous losses.
And it is worth giving a careful read to the response by a lawyer for the a Trump Organization. The NYT makes a case that it doesn’t deny things quite so much as change the subject.
Here, the NYT explores a financial connection to Russia: a Moscow beauty pageant. A Russian family invested and lost millions in the event while Trump, unlike with other pageants, collected millions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“I voted for Donald Trump. But this is not what I was expecting. We didn’t think they were going to take a chainsaw to a silk rug.”
Before you react, a few points. 1/
The man said he was a Trump voter. He was fired by a White House whose officials have assumed, and said in TV interviews, that federal employees are almost all “far left.” 2/
He was dismissed as part of a widespread purge. Yet the form email reads, “The Agency finds, based on your performance, that you have not demonstrated that your further employment at the Agency would be in the public interest.”
The decline of rural Democrats: Just a few years ago the party could win a lot of rural counties, which made them a lot more likely to win elections. open.substack.com/pub/steveinske…
“In 2006, Brown won a lot of rural counties, including a broad band several counties deep in Appalachia. In 2012 and 2018 he won fewer, and by 2024 he triumphed in no rural counties, none. He won only around Cleveland, Toledo, Columbus, Dayton.”
“Even though Missouri had become a red state in presidential elections by then, a Democrat could compete down ballot in rural areas. By 2018, this had changed. McCaskill was beaten back into three metro areas: St. Louis, Kansas City, and Columbia.”
“The way to understand our fractured world is to think more deeply, which takes time. Social media demands and rewards the opposite—instant conclusions, biases, instant rage. Its corrosive influence is evident in some of the posts by its richest and most famous users.”
“Here’s another, and sadder, way the experience is manipulated: we’re given to understand that the algorithm chokes off links that recommend articles. This has been one of the most valuable functions of Twitter. Now that’s less common.”
Help me out. Has Fox told their audience who Dick Cheney endorsed for president?
Much of the Fox audience voted for him in 2000 and 2004.
A website search turns up nothing. Maybe some mention on TV was not transcribed?
Seriously, I mean to be fair. Anything?
Many complaints about what the media “don’t cover” are just wrong. Often it turns out media did cover it. Or some that didn’t, have not confirmed the facts so they wait. Or whatever. But in this case it’s a straightforward news item involving a frequent past guest on Fox.
By way of comparison, I checked The NY Times (which many on the political left have decided to believe is pro-Trump, but that’s another story). Not a huge story, but comes up in several items.
How could so many people believe Trump’s claims about the 2020 election after so much evidence exposed the lies? History offers an answer. open.substack.com/pub/steveinske…
This is the latest of my regular emails—on our divided past and present. Subscribe at: steveinskeep.substack.com
“Nativist power faded and grew over time, but never vanished. It’s always been a culture war. At first it pitted native-born Protestants against largely Irish Catholics. In later times, nativists turned against Muslims or people of color.”
This is the latest of ny regular emails, which I propose to send directly to you. Take a free or paid subscription here:
.steveinskeep.substack.com
“Brands weaves in stories and perspectives I never knew… We first learn of the Battle of the Little Bighorn neither from the soldiers’ perspective nor from that of the coalition of warriors who confronted them, but from a young woman who saw and heard the fight.”