Curt Doolittle Profile picture
Sep 28, 2020 7 tweets 1 min read Read on X
SCIENCE: 1-There are three human (H.Sapiens) races (subspecies).These subspecies adapted geographically. Their direction of adaptation is neotenic. Neoteny allows agency (cognitive adaptability), permitting the sequential social, linguistic (cognitive), and technical revolutions.
SCIENCE: 2-The climate in Africa and the population distribution resisted neotenic evolution. The climate in west Eurasia and distribution accelerated neotenic evolution. The climate in east Asian and limited distribution acclerated neotenic evolution. Groups speciated further.
SCIENCE: 3-The Agrarian revolution was a significant caloric advantage but homogenized populations. The cline in Asia was southward and beneficial, but in Eurasia was north and regressive. The Steppe revolution was a significant cultural advantage and homogenized populations(IE).
SCIENCE: 4-The manorial revolutions in northern Europe and northern China were a significant political revolution, restoring natural selection under agrarianism. The industrial revolution provided expansion but reversed natural (Neotenic) selection and was regressive.
SCIENCE: 5-The evolution of man is the story of the neotenic self-domestication of man, and the subsequent domestication of territories, plants, animals, metals, chemistry and now physical properties.
SCIENCE: 6-The standard of living of civilizations is (was until 1950) a measure of the DENIAL of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, with the Europeans practicing the LEAST denial.
SCIENCE: 7-The Left-Jewish-Islamist counter-revolution is DEVOLUTIONARY resistance to market domestication. Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, Islam to reverse evolution. At present only China and the Slavs have the political system and will to resist devolution.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Curt Doolittle

Curt Doolittle Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @curtdoolittle

Feb 3, 2023
(Thoughts)
Our team works in via negativa constructive logic. But we use common terms to avoid neologisms. So for example, when we say 'moral' we mean 'not immoral', and we define immoral as irreciprocal, meaning empirically determined,by universally demonstrated retaliation.
1/n
So while individual, normative, and group variation in moral rules varies by context, this is due to personal, technological, environmental, and historical differences.
2/n
Yet retaliation against irreciprocity is a Universal.
So morality = that which will not provoke retaliation, and will continue cooperation, and the benefits of cooperation.
3/n
Read 8 tweets
Feb 3, 2023
Q:"What's the difference between philosophy, epistemology, logic, science?"

A:"Under unification: epistemically, empirically, logically, scientifically: scence=testimony of decidability, logic=spectrum of grammars of disambiguation, and philosophy=choice.

1/n
Why? Because once we know the first principle (law) of the universe we have a single universally commensurable value-neutral system of measurement (disambiguation, comparison) across all disciplines.
2/n
That single first principle is what we call evolution by continuous recursive disambiguation of entropy into persistence. Our language consists of continuous recursive disambiguation into identity for comparison (thinking, reason, calculation, truth, survival, persistence).
3/n
Read 7 tweets
Feb 2, 2023
This paragraph looks like ordinary language. But it's reducible to mathematics. But if we reduce it to mathematics we decrease the ability of most to understand and retain it. It is the most inclusive statement possible. And...
1/4 Image
... Christian love is an innovation that arose from observations of the real world (low trust and low trustworthiness of the Jewish people): it was empirical.
But...
2/4
...everything else in faith that prohibits additional progress in human condition by innovation by subsequent empirical, meaning scientific, observation is harmful and has been a harm to mankind since the jews restored Judaism to Jesus creating Xianity, and Arabs to Islam.
3/4
Read 4 tweets
Jan 14, 2023
I've had three long-term relationships with single moms. And I loved them. I was reasonably good at it. But there are lessons to be learned:
1) Her children come first, never you. You'll never reach the 'we come first then the kids' stage.
2) Unless you have children with her yourself you'll have a sex and relationship bond but not Familial (Equal) bond, and so you can't reach that 'we come first then the kids' stage. If you have kids, you can. Because now you have equal parental rights and obligations in her mind.
3) The age at which a woman mature sufficiently for a reciprocal relationship is beyond where she is capable and willing to have more children with you. So again, it's difficult to create a familial rather than just sex/relationship/economic bond (that's fragile).
Read 6 tweets
Dec 20, 2022
@HebrewCon Good post on 11/22 on soft secession. However, it's just another attempt at creating a separatist movement. And all separatist movements have failed without state protection, and the perils of alliance with the state (as your history repeatedly demonstrates).
While Jews at the upper end, sectarians in the middle, and Gypsies at the lower end, all sought self determination under agrarian empires and states, there is no means of leaving an industrial age empire, other than departure, secession, devolution to federation, or conquest.
The european civilzation stagnated in response to christian destruction of the ancient world (like marxism-pomo-woke destroys the modern). But because it was decentralized (Federated) it has gone through four cycles of restoration where all others stagnated by 800ad.
Read 8 tweets
Dec 19, 2022
(relationships)
1/4 I've had 3 marriages, 3 almost marriages (LTRs), a handful of STRs, and a small number of "we're datings". I don't do 1NSs. I "figure it out" whether we're a fit, quickly. Because of my hard-work-obsession, failing health seems to be what ends each of them.
2/4 I have loved each of these women - it's easy for me. It's in my nature to love most people. That said I have only loved one of them with everything in me (American). And only one of them with everything in me AND infinite respect for her. (Ukrainian).
3/4 I can understand my 20-yr marriage as fulfilling my desire to create a power couple - and it worked. But why is it 'power couple' not the general ambition, and instead, marriage for just sex, consumption, and entertainment? It's just a value in the upper classes now (again).
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(