Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 29, 2020 37 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Delhi High Court to shortly hear actor Rakul Preet's urgent plea to ensure that media does not broadcast any report on her in relation to the NCB investigation in the Rhea Chakraborty drug case.

@Rakulpreet

#NCB #RheaChakraborty #RakulPreet
Matter will be heard by Justice Navin Chawla.
Adv Aman Hingorani begins his submissions.

He appears for @Rakulpreet

This is the same prayer which was in the main Petition: Court

No. At that time there was no criminal investigation: Hingorani
Hingorani refers to Naveen Jindal vs Zee Media.

This Court discussed all the judgements and decided if it was appropriate to grant an injunction on media trial when investigation was pending. And the Court said yes: Hingorani
Hingorani reads Naveen Jindal judgement.
The power of high court has power to grant an injunction when investigation is at a preliminary stage: Hingorani continues to read.
Injunction was granted in Naveen Jindal in view of excessive adverse publicity and interference with the administration of justice and fair trial : Hingorani
After I moved Delhi HC, I saw that as per media reports, I was summoned by NCB on Sept 24. I was in Hyderabad and I had received no summons: Hingorani

@Rakulpreet
They said I was dodging NCB and indulging in delay tactics. I received the summons subsequently: Hingorani
If you have grievance against any particular broadcast, file an appropriate plea. These channels are not before me: Court

Naveen Jindal was a civil suit not a writ petition like the present case: ASG Chetan Sharma
I will show writ court has jurisdiction: Hingorani
Hingorani refers to other media reports that damaged her reputation.

Media ran reports so damaging.. I don't know Kshitij Prasad.. they didn't question me. I didn't name (anyone). This is Republic. They say drug were sent to her house. This is fake news: Hingorani
Can I pass an order in their absence saying thier news in fake news?: Court
Respondents are statutory bodies. Court directed that my representation should be taken up but they have not shown any urgency: Hingorani
Jindal's case is that court can grant an injunction if I'm being prejudiced: Hingorani
Hingorani reads a judgment.

Injunction till investigation is complete is not unreasonable restraint: Hingorani
High Court has ample inherent powers : Hingorani
Such injunctions are preemptive orders: Hingorani
Fake news is being peddled. I don't do drugs. I haven't named anyone. I've been removed from films. My right to dignity, privacy, to be left alone is being violated: Hingorani
My representation is listed for Oct 23 now. Where do I go: Hingorani
I'm not hearing it finally today: Court
Representation is listed for Oct 3. Some channels are not my members. I don't represent channels: News Broadcasters Association
We are hearing a lot of complaints. We are sitting regularly and taking up matters. : Adv Rahul Bhatia for NBA
Take it up and file a status report: Court
What has Centre done? Have you considered the complaint?: Court

NBA is seized of the matter. Our process is on: ASG Chetan Sharma
It shouldn't be that nothing is being done in spite of the order: Court
@Rakulpreet is not an accused. She is just being asked to join the investigation. It is a sensitive matter. I am empathize with my friend's client but the reality is such that a balanced view has to be taken: ASG Sharma
You are representing I&B. You have power under Cable TV Act. She is saying that there are reports that are wrong. She may ve completely wrong but you can't simply say that this is a sensitive case: Court
Prasar Bharti says that it is an unnecessary party in this case.
We have no power, statutory or otherwise, in this case: Adv Rajeev Sharma for Prasar Bharati
Court issues notice in the application.
Prasar Bharati I think will have no role here: Court
Respondents shall file a status report before the next date of hearing on the steps taken by them on @Rakulpreet's representation: Court orders.
Averments are factual. What can the I&B Ministry say?: ASG Sharma

Then say that only : Court
Mr Hingorani you can make submissions on Prasar Bharati's role.

Some channels are not my members: News Broadcasters Association

Say that in your reply: Court
Hearing adjourned.

Matter to be heard next on October 15.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Dec 19
Supreme Court to hear a batch of petitions challenging the Calcutta High Court's order which set aside the appointments in over 24,000 teaching and non-teaching posts in government schools #SupremeCourt @MamataOfficial Image
Sr Adv Vibha Datta Makhija: we would need two days.

CJI Sanjiv Khanna: Yes let us start. No piecemeal arguments.

State: Let the state start.
Sr Adv Rakesh Dwivedi begins for state of West Bengal
Read 14 tweets
Dec 16
Supreme Court hears appeal challenging the Madras High Court's decision to allow Carnatic vocalist TM Krishna to receive the Sangita Kalanidhi MS Subbulakshmi Award.

ASG Venkataraman: Award was
conferred and it was greatly publicised. He is a person who made misogynistic comment against her

#SupremeCourtImage
ASG: the single judge order is in effect. The music academy could not have given the award yersterday. Can an injunction be breached and a public act be committee? Court is not powerless.
ASG: the court can stay this award or till suit is pending the fourth respondent cannot use the name of the award at all

Sr Adv Gopal Sankarnarayanan: Fourth respondent is not represented here as of now.

Sr Adv CS Vaidyanathan appears for music academy
Read 13 tweets
Dec 13
Pushpa 2 hero Allu Arjun ARRESTED.

- LIVE UPDATES from Telangana High Court

- Allu Arjun is being represented by G Ashok Reddy

- Justice Juvvadi Sridevi to hear the matterImage
Justice Sridevi to hear the matter at 4 PM

#AlluArjun #ALLUARJUNARRESTED
Actor Allu Arjun was arrested after he visited Sandhya Theatre on December 4, 2024 to watch #Pushpa2. His security staff pushed general public and commotion caused a death of 39 year old. Her husband filed an FIR holding #AlluArjun & Management responsible for her death. Image
Read 96 tweets
Dec 11
Bhushan Steel insolvency case: #SupremeCourt to shortly hear the case

Earlier Enforcement Directorate (ED) has stated that its appeal against JSW Steel's takeover of Bhushan Power and Steel might not be required to be argued in view of Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)Image
Adv Zoheb Hossain: if the relief can be moulded then the plea can be disposed off.

Justice Bela Trivedi: are you appearing on behalf of SG Mehta?

Hossain: Attachment by ED has been made after the approval of plan by NCLT.. thus prayer can be considered. If it is restored then let the attachment be restored to resolution professional under 8(8).
Justice Trivedi: We will not pass any piecemeal orders.
Read 10 tweets
Dec 9
Tempers flare in #SupremeCourt amid hearing in case concerning adv Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal; Court urges lawyers to maintain discipline.

Court: If all of you behave like this ... Don’t you know this being livestreamed? Don’t you know these things are going in public domain? Image
Court: Don’t you think that this kind of behaviour inside the courtroom – what kind of impression is being given to the public? What kind of message is being given, you are officers of the Court all of you!

#SupremeCourt #CourtroomExchange
Court: Lot of training is required to be given to the bar also. We are sorry with the way you are going ahead ... You don't have any decorum to maintain in court?

#SupremeCourt #CourtroomExchange
Read 10 tweets
Nov 29
#BREAKING: Supreme Court issues notice on plea challenging constitutional validity of provisions of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986

Bench: Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan

#UPGangstersAct Image
Senior Adv R Basant (appears for Petitioner): Whether only on basis of one base case another case under the act can be registered by the police itself. Furthermore, police is complainant, prosecutor and adjudicator under provisions of the act. Please note. This is important
Sr Adv Basant: Also, under this Act, without even a case of FIR against a person, its entire property are allowed to be attached. This aspect came up in Dharmendra Kirthal (2013) 8 SCC 368 as well and the court had issued notice but later did not consider the issue.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(