Delhi High Court to shortly hear actor Rakul Preet's urgent plea to ensure that media does not broadcast any report on her in relation to the NCB investigation in the Rhea Chakraborty drug case.
This is the same prayer which was in the main Petition: Court
No. At that time there was no criminal investigation: Hingorani
Hingorani refers to Naveen Jindal vs Zee Media.
This Court discussed all the judgements and decided if it was appropriate to grant an injunction on media trial when investigation was pending. And the Court said yes: Hingorani
Hingorani reads Naveen Jindal judgement.
The power of high court has power to grant an injunction when investigation is at a preliminary stage: Hingorani continues to read.
Injunction was granted in Naveen Jindal in view of excessive adverse publicity and interference with the administration of justice and fair trial : Hingorani
After I moved Delhi HC, I saw that as per media reports, I was summoned by NCB on Sept 24. I was in Hyderabad and I had received no summons: Hingorani
They said I was dodging NCB and indulging in delay tactics. I received the summons subsequently: Hingorani
If you have grievance against any particular broadcast, file an appropriate plea. These channels are not before me: Court
Naveen Jindal was a civil suit not a writ petition like the present case: ASG Chetan Sharma
I will show writ court has jurisdiction: Hingorani
Hingorani refers to other media reports that damaged her reputation.
Media ran reports so damaging.. I don't know Kshitij Prasad.. they didn't question me. I didn't name (anyone). This is Republic. They say drug were sent to her house. This is fake news: Hingorani
Can I pass an order in their absence saying thier news in fake news?: Court
Respondents are statutory bodies. Court directed that my representation should be taken up but they have not shown any urgency: Hingorani
Jindal's case is that court can grant an injunction if I'm being prejudiced: Hingorani
Hingorani reads a judgment.
Injunction till investigation is complete is not unreasonable restraint: Hingorani
High Court has ample inherent powers : Hingorani
Such injunctions are preemptive orders: Hingorani
Fake news is being peddled. I don't do drugs. I haven't named anyone. I've been removed from films. My right to dignity, privacy, to be left alone is being violated: Hingorani
My representation is listed for Oct 23 now. Where do I go: Hingorani
I'm not hearing it finally today: Court
Representation is listed for Oct 3. Some channels are not my members. I don't represent channels: News Broadcasters Association
We are hearing a lot of complaints. We are sitting regularly and taking up matters. : Adv Rahul Bhatia for NBA
Take it up and file a status report: Court
What has Centre done? Have you considered the complaint?: Court
NBA is seized of the matter. Our process is on: ASG Chetan Sharma
It shouldn't be that nothing is being done in spite of the order: Court
@Rakulpreet is not an accused. She is just being asked to join the investigation. It is a sensitive matter. I am empathize with my friend's client but the reality is such that a balanced view has to be taken: ASG Sharma
You are representing I&B. You have power under Cable TV Act. She is saying that there are reports that are wrong. She may ve completely wrong but you can't simply say that this is a sensitive case: Court
Prasar Bharti says that it is an unnecessary party in this case.
We have no power, statutory or otherwise, in this case: Adv Rajeev Sharma for Prasar Bharati
Court issues notice in the application.
Prasar Bharati I think will have no role here: Court
Respondents shall file a status report before the next date of hearing on the steps taken by them on @Rakulpreet's representation: Court orders.
Averments are factual. What can the I&B Ministry say?: ASG Sharma
Then say that only : Court
Mr Hingorani you can make submissions on Prasar Bharati's role.
Some channels are not my members: News Broadcasters Association
Say that in your reply: Court
Hearing adjourned.
Matter to be heard next on October 15.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Delhi High Court to hear the defamation suit filed by Asian News International (ANI) against YouTuber Mohak Mangal over a video accusing ANI of extortion and blackmail after copyright strikes.
Comedian Kunal Kamra and AltNews co-founder Mohammed Zubair are also added as defendants for sharing the video on their X handles.
ANI is seeking takedown of the video, no further trademark infringement and damages of Rs. 2 crores, 10 lakhs.
Ceremonial bench proceedings underway to mark the last working day of Justice Abhay S Oka
AG R Venkataramani: All of us got equal treatment in your court. I have cherished the questioning moments. By working so tirelessly you have set bad standards for your law clerks as some even forgot to go home..
SG Tushar Mehta: Despite such an irreparable loss you treated duty as a judge first. You could have addressed virtually also. This shows duty. Please spare more time for family. You have often been much more prepared than lawyers. Your lordships services are required and please do not close any door
.
SG: you may not believe in God, but i believe, May God be always on your side. Me and ASG Raju were almost always at the wrong side of the judgment ..but our love and respect for you was never affected. We respect your for who you are.
Delhi High Court to shortly hear a defamation suit filed by Newslaundry Executive Editor Manisha Pande and eight other women journalists against Abhijit Iyer-Mitra for referring to them as ‘prostitutes’ and their workplace as a ‘brothel.’
Advocate Bani Dixit appears for Newslaundry journalists. She says "Plaintiffs are journalists from all walks of life. These are defamatory articles outside the bounds of criticism. These are all working women."
Court: What does the defendant do ?
Dixit: The kind of things he has said I cannot read it out also.
Supreme Court to shortly hear a petition challenging the arrest of Ali Khan Mahmudabad, an associate professor at Ashoka University, Sonipat, over certain remarks on Operation Sindoor
Supreme Court bench led by CJI B.R. Gavai would hear the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 on May 20, for the limited purpose of interim relief
#SupremeCourt #WaqfAct
The bench will consider whether interim relief of stay is required on three issues - waqf by user, nomination of non-Muslims to the Wakf Council and State Waqf Boards and identification of government land under waqf #WaqfAct
The Central government had earlier told the Supreme Court that certain key provisions of the controversial Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, including the formation of the Central Waqf Council and Waqf Boards and provisions on de-notifying properties already declared or registered as waqf, will not be acted upon for the time being.