Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 29, 2020 37 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Delhi High Court to shortly hear actor Rakul Preet's urgent plea to ensure that media does not broadcast any report on her in relation to the NCB investigation in the Rhea Chakraborty drug case.

@Rakulpreet

#NCB #RheaChakraborty #RakulPreet
Matter will be heard by Justice Navin Chawla.
Adv Aman Hingorani begins his submissions.

He appears for @Rakulpreet

This is the same prayer which was in the main Petition: Court

No. At that time there was no criminal investigation: Hingorani
Hingorani refers to Naveen Jindal vs Zee Media.

This Court discussed all the judgements and decided if it was appropriate to grant an injunction on media trial when investigation was pending. And the Court said yes: Hingorani
Hingorani reads Naveen Jindal judgement.
The power of high court has power to grant an injunction when investigation is at a preliminary stage: Hingorani continues to read.
Injunction was granted in Naveen Jindal in view of excessive adverse publicity and interference with the administration of justice and fair trial : Hingorani
After I moved Delhi HC, I saw that as per media reports, I was summoned by NCB on Sept 24. I was in Hyderabad and I had received no summons: Hingorani

@Rakulpreet
They said I was dodging NCB and indulging in delay tactics. I received the summons subsequently: Hingorani
If you have grievance against any particular broadcast, file an appropriate plea. These channels are not before me: Court

Naveen Jindal was a civil suit not a writ petition like the present case: ASG Chetan Sharma
I will show writ court has jurisdiction: Hingorani
Hingorani refers to other media reports that damaged her reputation.

Media ran reports so damaging.. I don't know Kshitij Prasad.. they didn't question me. I didn't name (anyone). This is Republic. They say drug were sent to her house. This is fake news: Hingorani
Can I pass an order in their absence saying thier news in fake news?: Court
Respondents are statutory bodies. Court directed that my representation should be taken up but they have not shown any urgency: Hingorani
Jindal's case is that court can grant an injunction if I'm being prejudiced: Hingorani
Hingorani reads a judgment.

Injunction till investigation is complete is not unreasonable restraint: Hingorani
High Court has ample inherent powers : Hingorani
Such injunctions are preemptive orders: Hingorani
Fake news is being peddled. I don't do drugs. I haven't named anyone. I've been removed from films. My right to dignity, privacy, to be left alone is being violated: Hingorani
My representation is listed for Oct 23 now. Where do I go: Hingorani
I'm not hearing it finally today: Court
Representation is listed for Oct 3. Some channels are not my members. I don't represent channels: News Broadcasters Association
We are hearing a lot of complaints. We are sitting regularly and taking up matters. : Adv Rahul Bhatia for NBA
Take it up and file a status report: Court
What has Centre done? Have you considered the complaint?: Court

NBA is seized of the matter. Our process is on: ASG Chetan Sharma
It shouldn't be that nothing is being done in spite of the order: Court
@Rakulpreet is not an accused. She is just being asked to join the investigation. It is a sensitive matter. I am empathize with my friend's client but the reality is such that a balanced view has to be taken: ASG Sharma
You are representing I&B. You have power under Cable TV Act. She is saying that there are reports that are wrong. She may ve completely wrong but you can't simply say that this is a sensitive case: Court
Prasar Bharti says that it is an unnecessary party in this case.
We have no power, statutory or otherwise, in this case: Adv Rajeev Sharma for Prasar Bharati
Court issues notice in the application.
Prasar Bharati I think will have no role here: Court
Respondents shall file a status report before the next date of hearing on the steps taken by them on @Rakulpreet's representation: Court orders.
Averments are factual. What can the I&B Ministry say?: ASG Sharma

Then say that only : Court
Mr Hingorani you can make submissions on Prasar Bharati's role.

Some channels are not my members: News Broadcasters Association

Say that in your reply: Court
Hearing adjourned.

Matter to be heard next on October 15.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Feb 11
Supreme Court hears the plea by Association of Democratic Reforms

CJI Sanjiv Khanna: what is this for ?

Adv Prashant Bhushan: we are Seeking that the procedure which ECI needs to adopt as per supreme Court judgment is in consonance with their standard operating protocol. What we want is that somebody should examine the software and the hardware of the EVMs in order to see if the software and hardware has any element of manipulation or notImage
CJI: Once votes are counted the paper trails are taken out or it's still there

Bhushan: they should maintain the paper trail

Sr Adv Devadatta Kamath: I appear for Sarva mitter. The entire data was wiped out. the evms on which polling was done should be tested.

CJI: to be done within seven days.. and the machine could be as per candidate choice and the burnt memory could be checked and verified.
Sr Adv Kamath: dummy units are checked not real ones. Here a fresh poll is being conducted and 40,000 being spent for verifying and checking each machine and the payment is to be by the candidate and then it's just a mock poll!
Read 10 tweets
Feb 11
Supreme Court hears PIL by National Federation of Indian Women over the alleged increase in cases of Lynching and MobViolence, particularly by 'CowVigilantes'

Justice BR Gavai: Issue has already concluded. Can we revive that by way of another writ

Adv Nizamuddin Pasha: But the issue is when private individuals are given police powers to seize vehicles and nab people for cattle smuggling.. this is how police powers are given to private agencies. Attitude of state machinery needs to be looked at and see how brazen it is.. some kind of oversight from this court will helpImage
Justice Gavai: You can challenge those notifications before the court

Pasha: It exists across states and is across spectrum

SG Tushar Mehta: I appear for the Union. If such things are happening it can be challenged

Pasha: 13 states follow this rule
Justice Gavai: is there are a direction in this case by us to all states .

SG: On Nov 6,2024, 6 states as selected by petitioner were asked to respond.

Pasha: and thereafter all states and UTs were made a part. Oct 28,2023, was the plea to implead all States and UTs . They have replied also
Read 9 tweets
Jan 28
Should former AAP councillor Tahir Hussain  granted interim bail in a case related to Delhi riots so that he may campaign for the upcoming Delhi Assembly polls as an All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) candidate?

#SupremeCourt to hear @AamAadmiParty @aimim_national Image
The case comes to a three-judge bench after Justice Pankaj Mithal ruled that bail should be denied and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah stated that bail should be granted #TahirHussain #DelhiElection2025 Image
Hearing to commence at 10:30 am #SupremeCourtofIndia Image
Read 16 tweets
Jan 20
Supreme Court hears the case where village residents oppose the burial of a Christian man in the graveyard of their village in Chhattisgarh’s Bastar

Son of deceased Ramesh Baghel, a farmer from a Scheduled Caste (SC) community, who has kept the body in a mortuary for 12 days now is before supreme court

Justice BV Nagarathna: Why cannot a person before buried where they wanted to. Body is in mortuary? We are sorry to say that A person has to come to supreme court for the burial of his father. The HC, panchayat etc are not able to solve the problem. The HC says there will be law and order problem.. we are pained at this.Image
SG Tushar Mehta: if the case is to be decided only on emotions then I have nothing to say, else let it be argued

Sr Adv Colin Gonsalves: see the real reason, burial not being allowed because the person had converted.

SG: Intention may be to make this a precedent for rest of country. There is burial ground for the tribals who are not Christians. Though they are not christians they bury their dead. When christians die, just 20 km away there is a christian burial ground and they take the dead their and bury them. This ground is a Hindu tribal burial ground. Thus rather than not being vehement that I will not go 20 kms away.. then there are laws..
Justice Nagarathna: but what about burying in own land?

SG: once you bury or cremate someone in a private land the character of land changes it becomes a sacred place and it also has health issues. That is not permitted.. cremation etc is not allowed in private lands

Justice Nagarathna: no no nothing remains after cremation...

SG: it is not about one person it is the beginning of something else.
Read 12 tweets
Jan 2
#SupremeCourt hears plea seeking quashing of the entire process of designation of 70 lawyers as senior advocates undertaken by the Delhi High Court Image
Adv Mathew Nedumpara makes submissions
Justice BR Gavai: How many judges can you name whose offsprings have been made seniors ?

Nedumpara: I have given a chart..

Justice Gavai: we will grant you liberty to amend the plea and if it is not amended then we will take steps accordingly. Tell us who is the signatory to the profession.

Nedumpara: I myself.

SC: then tell us you want to withdraw or anything
Read 6 tweets
Dec 28, 2024
#Madrashighcourt will continue hearing today, the batch of petitions on the sexual assault of a student inside the Anna University campus in Chennai. Image
The vacation bench of
Justices SM Subramaniam and V Lakshminarayan assembles
Advocate General PS Raman: From what we have understood, some things have particularly affected the collective consciousness of this Court- The leaked details in the FIR and the Commissioner's statements in the press conference
Read 38 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(