A Karnataka HC Division Bench comprising of Justices BV Nagarathna and Ravi Hosmani will pass order in a batch of pleas challenging the 25% domicile reservation at NLSIU.
The judgment will be pronounced by the Bench at 4:30 pm.
Bench: State does not have the power to enact the 25% Reservation for Domicile Students in NLSIU.
NLSIU Amendment Act is ultra vires and contrary to the provisions of the parent Act, NLSIU Act.
This is the first part.
Bench: NLS is not on par with the other Law Schools because of its curriculum, reservation policy, control of BCI, trimester system etc
Karnataka students' aspirations cannot be said to be in Karnataka alone especially with LPG. (liberalisation, Privatization and Globalization)
Regional Backwardness would not apply here.
Bench: Let executive council make a reservation policy for women or for weaker sections of the society. That would be a challenge for the students. This is not on record.
Breaking: NLSIU Amendment Act is struck down, does not meet twin test of Article 14.
Bench: No scientific study conducted for the object sought. New reservation policy is contrary to the purpose of the Law School
Ultimately no purpose is served. The twin test of reservation in Article 14 is not met.
Bench: 5% concession to be given to Karnataka Students (under 25% domicile reservation) is tampering with the Merit List, not permissible under Article 14.
Bench refers to a judgement and says - Rule of the game cannot be changed after the game has begun.
Bench: We have not interefered with 120 seats. Everything else is interfered with.
We are not done. First have patience, says the Bench.
On reservation of women, Petitioner Adv CK Nandakumar says that women have been performing exceedingly well. Recently, a student got 18 medals.
Bench: Yes, I read about her, Yamuna.
Bench: When is the result of CLAT coming?
Response: October 5.
Bench: We are well within the timeline.
Breaking: Karnataka High Court quashes 25% domicile reservation at NLSIU Bangalore [Read full story] #nlsiu@NLSIUofficial
Supreme Court to shortly hear petitions raising objections to the SIR exercise ahead of the upcoming assembly elections in Bihar #BiharSIR2025 #BiharElections @ECISVEEP #SupremeCourt
Bihar voter list revision: ECI tells Supreme Court no deletion without prior notice, hearing
An affidavit by ECI stated these safeguards are further reinforced by a robust two-tier appeal mechanism ensuring that every elector has adequate recourse against any adverse action.
Supreme Court hears Indian Medical Association’s petition on alleged misleading statements and advertisements targeting the practice of allopathic medicine.
Bench: Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice KV Viswanathan.
#SupremeCourt #Misleadingmedicalads
Justice Nagarathna: all the reliefs sought in the prayers have already been achieved. We should close this now.
Amicus Curiae Sr. Adv. Shadan Farasat: the status quo may be maintained.
Justice Nagarathna: Court cannot legislate neither can it revive an omission.
Counsel: in ayurveda you can come up and say this is the cure of this disease, people will be lured. And the disease will be in curable by the time they will approach the allopathic doctor.
Justice Nagarathna: so long as they are permitted to manufacture and they manufacture it afterwards we can’t say don’t…
Supreme Court hears a plea concerning pollution from the massive discharge of untreated effluents by tanneries into the Palar River in Vellore District, Tamil Nadu.
Bench: Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan
In the last hearing, Court issued slew of directions, notably ordering compensation to affected families, recoverable from the polluting industries under the “polluter pays” principle.
The Court also ordered the constitution of an expert panel to assess and audit ecological damage and recommend remedial measures.
The Supreme Court will shortly continue hearing the appeals concerning JSW Steel’s ₹19,700 crore resolution plan for Bhushan Power and Steel Limited (BPSL).
SG Tushar Mehta hands over a note on EBITDA to the court.
Senior Advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul begins his arguments.
Delhi High Court directs Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to register complaint on the basis of its preliminary inquiry into allegations of inmates and jail authorities running an extortion racket and other criminal activities at Tihar Jail.
The Bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela today heard the matter.
Court - The preliminary enquiry report shows involvement of the inmates and jail officials in various kinds of illegal and corrupt practices going on in the jail.
Supreme Court resumes hearing the cash-for-jobs scam case involving ex-TN minister Senthil Balaji.
Bench: Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi
#SupremeCourt #SenthilBalaji #cashforjobscam
On the last hearing the Court had pulled up the State government for naming more than 2000 individuals as accused remarking that a “cricket stadium” would be required to conduct trial.
Sr. Adv. Kapil Sibal (for Balaji): these are 3 applications.
Justice Kant: after 2 years you’re filing applications.
Sibal: without notice they have filed counters in 25.2. All that I want is in the first application the matter may be decided by the trial court without being influenced by the observations. I want a caveat. That’s all I want.