Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 29, 2020 19 tweets 5 min read Read on X
A Karnataka HC Division Bench comprising of Justices BV Nagarathna and Ravi Hosmani will pass order in a batch of pleas challenging the 25% domicile reservation at NLSIU.
The judgment will be pronounced by the Bench at 4:30 pm.

@NLSIUofficial
@barcouncilindia

#nlsiu
#reservation
On Sept 1 - All parties completed arguments and the Court reserved its order.

On Sept 8 - Court stayed the National Law School of India University (NLSIU) Amendment Act, 2020, by which 25% domicile reservation was introduced.

@NLSIUofficial
@barcouncilindia
The Bench assembles.

@NLSIUofficial
@barcouncilindia
Bench: State does not have the power to enact the 25% Reservation for Domicile Students in NLSIU.

NLSIU Amendment Act is ultra vires and contrary to the provisions of the parent Act, NLSIU Act.

This is the first part.
Bench: NLS is not on par with the other Law Schools because of its curriculum, reservation policy, control of BCI, trimester system etc
Karnataka students' aspirations cannot be said to be in Karnataka alone especially with LPG. (liberalisation, Privatization and Globalization)

Regional Backwardness would not apply here.
Bench: Let executive council make a reservation policy for women or for weaker sections of the society. That would be a challenge for the students. This is not on record.
Breaking: NLSIU Amendment Act is struck down, does not meet twin test of Article 14.
Bench: No scientific study conducted for the object sought. New reservation policy is contrary to the purpose of the Law School
Ultimately no purpose is served. The twin test of reservation in Article 14 is not met.
Bench: 5% concession to be given to Karnataka Students (under 25% domicile reservation) is tampering with the Merit List, not permissible under Article 14.
Bench refers to a judgement and says - Rule of the game cannot be changed after the game has begun.
Bench: We have not interefered with 120 seats. Everything else is interfered with.
We are not done. First have patience, says the Bench.
On reservation of women, Petitioner Adv CK Nandakumar says that women have been performing exceedingly well. Recently, a student got 18 medals.

Bench: Yes, I read about her, Yamuna.
Bench: When is the result of CLAT coming?

Response: October 5.

Bench: We are well within the timeline.
Breaking: Karnataka High Court quashes 25% domicile reservation at NLSIU Bangalore [Read full story] #nlsiu @NLSIUofficial

bit.ly/3cH2v5e
NLS has to comply with the timeline for admission of CLAT students, Bench.

Bench rises.
Breaking: Karnataka HC quashes 25% domicile reservation at NLSIU Bangalore
@NLSIUofficial @SBAnlsiu #NLSIU
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Jul 22
A Battle for Alimony in the #SupremeCourt

Chief Justice B.R:
What is your demand (for alimony)?

Lady: Just the house in Mumbai, free of all costs. And ₹12 crore as maintenance.

CJI Gavai: But that house is in Kalpataru… one of the good builders. You’re an IT person. You’ve done your MBA. You’re in demand ..Bengaluru, Hyderabad... Why don’t you work also?”

“You had a marriage for just 18 months,” the CJI continues, “and now you also want a BMW?” 18 months marriage and you want one crore for each month!

Lady: But he is very rich. And he sought the nullity of the marriage claiming I’m schizophrenic.

Sr Adv Madhavi Divan for the Husband: She has to work also. Everything cannot be demanded like this.

Lady: Do I look Schizophrenic My Lords

CJI Gavai: File income tax returns. But understand you cannot claim the properties of his father also.

Case again at 2 pm.Image
Bench reassembled

CJI Gavai: Where are the returns?

Lady: Yes it is here

Sr Adv Divan: Please give the entire copy .. see 2015-16 there is high income because he was employed then Image
CJI: Income in 2015-16

Divan: 2 crore 50 lakhs and 1 crore bonus itself..there are also allegations of proxy businesses. Let's take that also for example.. those balance sheets also there. There is nothing to talk about.. if he can just keep the job
Read 7 tweets
Jul 17
Plea in #SupremeCourt seeks FIR against sitting Delhi HC judges

Adv: This plea seeks registration of FIR against sitting HC judges. The issue is when I am the topper of the exam, but all judges.. ideally case should be heard by court 1..

Justice Surya Kant: Are you wanting to argue or you want to do bench hunting? We understand this kind of publicity stunts. Which college you did graduate and MBA?

Adv: engineering from DU and MBA From IIM Kozhikode

Justice Kant: still you make such scandalous allegationsImage
Adv: If this can be treated it as a civil petition.. then this court can..

Justice Kant: just because there are illegal, perverse petitions being filed . You cannot ask FIRs against judges. How many cases have you done

Adv: I did law for this case only

Justice Kant: that's what I thought. Tell me under which law judges are liable to be prosecuted for giving judgments against you.
Justice Kant: What happened to your contempt plea? Why unconditional apology to the tribunal then?

Adv: the court officer told me that earlier order passed was destroyed. the case was earlier only adjourned..

Justice Kant: why unconditional apology

Adv: Justice Vipin Sanghi told me to apologise to tribunal when I moved high court
Read 7 tweets
Jul 17
"We are constantly monitored by social media" - Solicitor General Tushar Mehta is making arguments opposing X Corp's plea in Karnataka HC challenging Central govt. 'Sahyog' portal to issue content blocking orders.

Matter before Justice Nagaprasanna. Track Thread for updates Image
SG Mehta: We are constantly being monitored by social media sites, we are products for them ... There is a kind of profiling for every individual.
Judge: Whatever you desire...

SG Mehta: .. You are bombarded with it (on the phone). Even speaking is now (monitored)

Judge: Yes, whatever you are speaking to someone, you get all the related content on phone.
Read 76 tweets
Jul 16
Supreme Court to shortly hear the plea where it had granted interim bail to Ali Khan Mahmudabad, Professor of Ashoka University, in connection with his Facebook post on Operation Sindoor #SupremeCourt #OperationSindoor Image
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: A status report has been filed. Please see what was said earlier.. that probe shall be confined to the two FIRs only.
Sr Adv Sibal: please see page 2. Para 8 of the status report. it shows data extraction report of devices and SIT examining it. Then it says investigation shall be carried out in accordance with the law. Then it says reports from FSL received..now they want to know where you travelled for the last 10 years.
Read 14 tweets
Jul 10
Supreme Court to shortly hear a batch of petitions challenging the Election Commission of India’s June 24, 2025 order for a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar months before the state goes to assembly polls #BiharElections2025 #SupremeCourtofIndia @ECISVEEP Image
Some of the petitions are by TMC MP Mahua Moitra, former AAP co-founder Yogendra Yadav, Manoj RJD MP Manoj Jha, Association for Democratic Reforms among others @MahuaMoitra @_YogendraYadav @RJDforIndia @pbhushan1
@MahuaMoitra @_YogendraYadav @RJDforIndia @pbhushan1 A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi to hear the matter today #BiharElections2025 #SupremeCourtofIndia
Read 54 tweets
Jul 3
Former Supreme Court judge Justice Abhay S Oka to shortly deliver the Late Justice H.R. Khanna Memorial Lecture on "Independence of Judiciary" organised by the Goa HC Bar Association

#SupremeCourt Image
Justice AS Oka: I must clarify that when it comes to independence of judiciary, irrespective of the party in power, irrespective of the fact whether there is emergency or not, there is always a threat to independence of judiciary. And therefore, the members of the judicial fraternity, namely the judges and members of the bar have to be always alert and ensure that independence remains
Justice Oka: Let us also say here that there are judges and Chief Justices of the Supreme Court, who have been already forgotten, but there are large number of judges of the High Court who never went to the Supreme Court, and they are remembered forever. There are judges of the Supreme Court who did not become Chief Justices of India, but they are remembered forever. I am giving an example of our Mumbai High Court only biopic. We had Chief Justice M.C. Chagla, Justice Chittutosh Mukherjee, Justice P.D. Desai, and Justice M.L. Pence. These great judges never went to the Supreme Court, but we fondly remember them. I can add many names to that, like Justice Vimadala, Justice Lentin, and so many other names can be added.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(