Just watched excellent @Morning_Joe interview with @AWeissmann_. Weissmann was thoughtful and direct. But I came away boiling, once again, at the manifold failures of Mueller and their costs. Whether motivated by decency or not, he profoundly let down the American people.
More importantly, Weissman made it clear, yet again, that Trump, with the help of Barr and McConnell, made obstruction of justice the central organizing principle of this Administration. The entire executive branch was focused on protecting Russia and hiding Trump's many crimes.
It all seems so much more trenchant in the context of understanding the president's financial situation better as we do today, how vulnerable he was to manipulation, and how egregiously wrong it was for Mueller to fail to press at a full financial investigation of the president.
As I often say, working with Russia to undermine our democracy was the original sin of the Trump Administration...and we are little closer to achieving justice in that case than we were when the crimes were occurring. When you consider not only the profundity of that crime...
...but its cascading consequences, the crushing compound tragedies of the Trump Administration, this is the greatest single instance of the failure of our system of justice in its history. (Institutional bias against the poor, people of color, and women & on behalf of the rich...
...the powerful and the rule white majority is the greatest systemic failure.) Barr and McConnell and their supporters, minions and enablers serially betrayed the first principles of our justice system--that no man is above the law, that there is equal justice for us all, and...
...that those in charge of that system place their commitment to impartiality and the Constitution before that to any individual or political party--and then actively undercut our national security, empowering our enemies and a man who was profoundly unfit to be our president.
But not only is this a gross miscarriage of justice, not only is it a series of crimes that are still be committed to this day, but it enabled Trump to achieve his Russian sponsors ultimate goal of profoundly weakening America both internationally and at home.
Think of the 200,000 souls who would still be with us if it were not for this failure of our system. Think of the anguish of their families. The individual losses. The torment as they died alone. That horror can be traced to Putin, Trump, Barr and McConnell.
The same can be said for the tens of million struggling without work, the American cities straining under economic catastrophe...as it can be for those who will suffer in future because of gutting environmental protections or who suffer worldwide as democracy is weakened.
Would Jamal Khashoggi be alive today if Trump had been stopped? Would 3000 people in Puerto Rico? Would thousands of families not have been broken up, tens of thousand thrown into cages, some children left to die in sorrow, squalor and isolation?
The list of consequences of letting Vladimir Putin's candidate for president, a serial criminal unfit for the office and unconcerned with the fate of the country or anyone in it other than himself and his equally criminal family, is too long for this brief thread.
The scale of the human costs is almost impossible to fathom unless we take the time to imagine victims, their families, their last hours, their current struggles, one by one, in human terms. But if we do, we realize that our system of justice has failed us.
Our leaders have corrupted it and made it an extension of their criminal undertaking. And there is now just one way to bring it back--a way made even less certain due to their corruption and ability to manipulate and abuse our system. And that is to vote for @JoeBiden.
The one path to justice and to preserve what is worth preserving in America is to vote for @JoeBiden, vote for @KamalaHarris, vote in place a Democratic majority in the Senate, build on the Democratic majority in the House. But that is just a first step.
We will not achieve justice nor will our institutions be able to recover if we do not ensure that the corruption of these past four years does not become the precedent for the years to come. Trump and his enablers must be fairly and impartially investigated.
The facts they have long sought to cover up must be uncovered. And if crimes were committed and are revealed those who committed them must be held accountable. A Democratic victory in November alone is essential but it is not adequate.
Our justice system must succeed under Biden and Harris where it failed under Trump and Pence. That must be a priority. And we must discount efforts to say such investigation and prosecution would be divisive. Quite the contrary is true.
Only through proving no man is above the law, that there is equal justice under law in this country, that our justice system is impartial, that we are committed to truth, that we will actively defend ourselves against threats foreign and domestic, that we can begin to heal.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Every single time you engage in the delusion that Trump has a "policy position" on traditional issues you normalize him. Trump has no beliefs, no traditional policy views. For him, policies are like his blue suit & dumb long red ties, a costume he wears to hide who he really is.
He is a terrorist calling himself a freedom fighter. This election is not about his tax policy versus that of Kamala Harris, even if he has proposals in that area. It is about the fact that he is a criminal, a traitor, a fraudster, a liar, the worst president in our history...
...a terrible human being who seeks to reward himself & his friends at the expense of everyone else. Everything he does is first and foremost about what is in it for him and occasionally for his supporters (because he needs to pay them off to get what he wants for himself.)
Given the number of ways that a candidate can communicate directly with voters--the relevance and wisdom of doing so through intermediaries who will filter the news and who often will bend it to suit other agendas has diminished. That seems reasonable to me.
The argument that the press is the objective presenter of facts has been weakened as virtually all media seek to adjust their presentation of content to suit business or political objectives. There are fewer and fewer journalists who can be relied upon to seek objective truth.
Too many are compromised not only by the agenda of their company's owners but by their own history of access journalism or sensationalism or focusing on the trending rather than the important story. They howl at being ignored or bypassed. But they share some of the blame.
The argument that Harris is somehow not speaking enough to the press is ridiculous on several levels: 1.) She actually does speak to the press, 2.) She has been visible constantly since she became the candidate, 3.) She has been clear and detailed about all her policy goals.
4.) She has been readily available to the press for four years. There are few questions about her that have not already been asked and answered. 5.) The goal of the campaign is for her to communicate with voters. So far, they seem to have responded well to what she has said.
6.) Her opponent is actually not campaigning, is primarily speaking to patsies in the press when he does speak to the media, and lies constantly so it doesn't matter what he is asked because he won't answer truthfully.
Folks, if you want a US policy toward Israel and Gaza that is more focused on relieving the suffering the people of Gaza and achieving a lasting, just peace, disrupting the campaign of the one person most likely to deliver that is a bad idea. Especially when...
...she has indicated a willingness to meet with groups that share your views. She may not agree with all of your ideas and suggestions. But she is by far your best and only legitimate hope of change and weakening her is a crazily self-destructive process.
You may not like this reality. But you would like the alternatives--Trump or the status quo--much much much less. You may not feel you can wait for our political processes to work out...but frankly, there is no alternative choice that is available or possible.
To all the geniuses who feel Harris should have picked Shapiro to "win Pennsylvania" I ask, um, when was the last time that was the reason a VP was picked? (Hint: It is seldom if ever the reason a VP candidate was picked.)
Here, let me do some quick math for you. Biden certainly didn't pick Harris to win a contested state. Trump picked neither Vance nor Pence to win contested states. HRC picked Tim Kaine to help in Va., that's true, and he helped. It was an outlier.
Do you think McCain picked Palin to win Alaska? Edwards did not help Kerry win North Carolina. Did Cheney get picked to help Bush in Montana? No. How about Lieberman to help Gore in Connecticut. No. Clinton did win Al Gore's home state of Tennessee...
The recent discussion about Biden has gone through phases. The first was about the debate performance. The second was about whether that was a signal of potential problems to come. But we are now in a third phase which turns more fears about the state of the campaign.
These concerns are largely from political professionals (not commentators). They turn not just on setbacks since the debate but on the fact that the campaign was seemingly spinning its wheels even beforehand. I sense a bunch of it is from worried folks down the ballot.
These conversations seem to be continuing despite Biden's repeated statements that he is definitely running and in it for the long haul and have not been helped by recent polling data, the Cook Report downgrade of Dem battleground prospects, etc.