Chris Murphy 🟧 Profile picture
Sep 29, 2020 5 tweets 1 min read Read on X
1/ If Amy Coney Barrett gets to the Supreme Court, the ACA is gone, and in Connecticut, 260,000 will lose their insurance.

That's the equivalent combined population of these CT towns:

Litchfield
Easton
Durham
Haddam
Woodstock
Old Lyme
Essex...

(not done...see rest of thread)
2/

Lebanon
Westbrook
Brooklyn
New Hartford
Killingworth
Marlborough
Beacon Falls
Willington
Bethany
Harwinton
Pomfret
Chester
Barkhamsted
Ashford

(wait...not done...)
3/

Columbia
North Stonington
East Granby
Canterbury
Bolton
Preston
Deep River
Middlefield
Union
Canaan
Warren
Colebrook
Norfolk
Lisbon

(nope...not done)
4/

Thomaston
Bridgewater
Scotland
Eastford
Hampton
Franklin
Hartland
Roxbury
Chaplin
Morris
Lyme
Voluntown
Sharon
Bozrah

(keep reading...)
5/

Kent
Sprague
Goshen
Andover
North Canaan
Bethlehem
Washington
Salisbury
Sherman
Sterling
Salem

That's the total population of 62 towns in CT. And insurance would disappear, likely overnight, for all these families.

Amy Coney Barrett would create a humanitarian catastrophe.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chris Murphy 🟧

Chris Murphy 🟧 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChrisMurphyCT

Mar 6
I have some bad news - buried in the appropriations bill being voted on this week is a terrible new gun policy rider that significantly rolls back the firearms background check system.

1/ You need to know about this - it’s bad enough that I will vote against the entire bill.
2/ Republicans (and one or two Democrats) pushed for the new rider that allows, for the first time in 30 years, veterans judged by the VA to be mentally incompetent to buy guns.

These are very very mentally ill veterans - those at the highest risk of suicide.
3/ I can’t sugarcoat this: this provision - which could result in 20,000 new seriously mentally ill individuals being able to buy guns each year - will be a death sentence for many.

It’s unacceptable this provision was pushed by Republicans. Democrats shouldn’t have acquiesced.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 4
Minutes ago, the text of the bipartisan national security funding bill was released. It:

-funds Ukraine, Israel, and humanitarian relief
-secures our border and reforms our asylum law

1/ As the co-author of the immigration provisions, here's a THREAD on the key elements:
2/ First - it would be easy to just keep immigration and border policy as a political cudgel for another 40 years. But politics at its best is about finding bipartisan compromise on the toughest issues. That's what we've done here.

Here's a snapshot of what's in the bill.
3/ A quicker, fairer asylum process. No more 10 yr wait. Claims processed in a non-detained, non-adversarial way in 6 months.

A slightly higher asylum screening standard at the border.

Also, no more waiting for work permits. Most asylum seekers can work immediately.
Read 10 tweets
Oct 21, 2023
I support Israel in its mission to seek justice for the worst terrorist attack in their history.

1/ That means providing funding and weapons. But it also means making sure they don't repeat our mistakes in Afghanistan when we invaded after our nation's worst terrorist attack.
2/ We were too permissive of civilian casualties, and we did not understand that our operations were creating two Taliban recruits for everyone we eliminated.

You cannot defeat a movement if you are constantly providing it bulletin board material for recruitment efforts.
3/ War planning is not complete without a realistic endgame.

Shutting down all ungovernable space, creating a western style Afghan democracy, and killing every Taliban member were not realistic goals. Had we admitted this at the start, our war plan would have been different.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 26, 2023
The UAW fight is so important because it strikes at the heart of America's spiritual crisis.

The hollowing out of workers' economic power has been devastating for American families. So many people feel not in control of their lives, because they work so hard and get so little.
Both parents work. Child care is outsourced to strangers. There's not enough money coming in to do anything other than pay the bills. No vacations. No college savings. One big medical bill away from insolvency. No breathing room.

It's an exhausting existence.
And all the while, these families watch the mega-rich, including the executives at the companies they work for, get richer. They know that the system is rigged against them. And the anxiety and anger that was already there boils over.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 13, 2023
I attended today's meeting and will play a role in the upcoming debate. But I have concerns unique from many of my colleagues.

1/ Yes, deep fakes/job displacement worry me. But I'm more concerned with the psychological cost of outsourcing so many basic human functions to AI.
2/ Conversation, composition, creativity, discovery, in person connection - these are the things that make us human and fill our lives with meaning and value.

What happens when AI writes our e-mails, composes our music, creates our art? What happens as machines replace teachers?
3/ I know it's not black and white. I know there are huge benefits to AI and machine learning. Yes, AI could enhance our creativity, make our composition better, help us find new friends, improve educational experience.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 31, 2023
Thousands of gun dealers currently do not do background checks, allowing loads of criminals to get guns.

The 2022 gun bill sought to change that, and today Biden announced the rule to implement the change.

1/ This is a BIG deal. Let me tell you why.
msn.com/en-us/news/pol…
2/ Only people "engaged in the business" of selling firearms have to conduct background checks on buyers. In the era of gun shows and , with thousands of part time sellers making big profits off selling guns, the pre-internet definition had become outdated.armslist.com
3/ The 2022 Bipartisan Safer Communities Act changed the definition of "engaged in the business" to clarify that selling guns didn't need to be your "livelihood". You just had to be selling guns in order to make a profit.

It was a big, important - but largely unnoticed - change.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(