DoJ continues: it's not true that the DoJ would operate corruptly. The US Attorneys office to decision to dismiss this case was the right call. We are unafraid to address the specifics as to why we want it dismissed.
In our judgement there isn't a case. As the court knows, once the government finds evidence of wrongdoing, we must do a proper investigation. AG asked Jensen to do a review. The FBI is looking into it, too. It's a continuing review. Some things have been found...
Including the case agent Barnett ws working on the flynn caase when it was realized flynn talked to Kislyak. That call didn't change his assessment that flynn was compromised by russia. He briefed SCO that there was no crime, and he observed the flynn case was used to "get trump"
Those accusation alone would be game over for the prosecution. Notes discovered at DoJ show the SCO met with DoJ and observed that flynn had a bad memory. That's consistent with his claims of innocence
Plus we now have the HPSCI transcript of Comey's testimony where he said he didn't know if flynn lied. When the director says he doesnt know flynn lied, thats a problem for the government. We don't just throw eviden on the wall to see what sticks
The agents left the interview and said they couldn't tell if he was lying. Finally, we have to prove the case with witnesses. There's no recording of what flynn said so its the testimony of the agents. SULLIVAN: Wait, are you saying there's no recording of what flynn said?
There's no recording of the FBI interview. it's the FBI's recollection. (interesting, Sullivan must be referring to the Flynn/kislyak call recordings, lol). DoJ continues: it's just the word of the FBI agents.
And strzok said that this was an insurance policy that trump wouldn't be elected and the next day he opened the investigation. And he misleaded [sic] the government. And he and andy mccabe were fired. So all our witnesses have been fired and had findings by IG for lying...
I hate to break it to you, but even if Garland had appointed a special counsel in 2021 and trump was indicted a year earlier, there still would not have been a trial before the election. Let me explain. 1/
We know that last year, donald filed for immunity. That's interlocutory, which means it has to be solved before trial. That whole appeal and oral argument process from district court to circuit court to SCOTUS, took nearly a year. 2/
The way SCOTUS set up the process is that they sent it back to the lower court to determine what's immune and what's not under their new immunity rules, and then THAT second immunity decision is interlocutory, too. 3/
Allow me to go through Tim Pool’s sad excuses for why he’s quitting two weeks before an election. 1/
1. “It’s not a financial thing. We make a lot of money.”
Okay, but you want to start a family and you’re gonna quit the big ol’ money maker? Or is your wife the bread winner? Kinda woke, isn’t it? 2/
2. “The structure becomes bigger and bigger and bigger until it becomes impossible to manage.”
Then you expand and hire people and pay them well and give them benefits. Sorry you’re unable to run a small business. I started at my kitchen table with 10 downloads. Now I run a network and have over 50M. But I don’t get millions from Russia. 3/
THREAD: Despite the overwhelming support for telling my story, I want to address some of the pushback I've received from Republicans on this site. First, "This is pure propaganda. Florida has exceptions for rape. You support killing babies so much you’re willing to lie to unsuspecting people about it." 1/
Let me address the "Florida has an exception for rape" point first. Florida does have an exception for rape if you provide a "police report, restraining order, medical record, or other court order." That requires the service member to report their rape. Let me tell you what happened when I tried to report my rape. 2/
I was wrapped in a blanket and bleeding because my rapist's friends had stolen my clothes. It was still dark, around 0400. I snuck out and went to the on-base law enforcement office to report the rape. I was seated in an interrogation room under one of those fluorescent lamps at a metal desk, where I waited for about 30 minutes. 3/
Um, wow. The evidence and testimony Jack Smith has is DAMNING. For instance, the government has testimony that Donald said of the voter fraud claims that the "details don't matter." There is also testimony that trump said it didn't matter if he lost, he would just declare he won. 1/
There are also multiple conversations Pence had with his running mate that they'd lost and it was time to "take a bow". I'm just digging into this, but Trump is cooked. None of this is immune (or the presumptive immunity can be easily rebutted.) 2/
HA! When Trump was on the phone with Michigan, lying to them about voter fraud, Trump was corrected and reminded he lost two counties becuase he "underperformed with educated females", which pissed him off. 3/
NEW: THREAD: A new ruling from Judge McBurney in Georgia overturning the abortion ban and allowing the procedure to continue has some REMARKABLE quotes. Let's take a look at just a few. 1/
"While the State’s interest in protecting “unborn” life is compelling, until that life can be sustained by the State -- and not solely by the woman compelled by the Act to do the State’s work -- the balance of rights favors the woman." 2/
"Women are not some piece of collectively owned community property the disposition of which is decided by majority vote. Forcing a woman to carry an unwanted, not-yet-viable fetus to term violates her constitutional rights to liberty and privacy, even taking into consideration whatever bundle of rights the not-yet-viable fetus may have." 3/