Lizzie Dearden Profile picture
Sep 29, 2020 4 tweets 2 min read Read on X
As MPs prepare to vote on extending the Coronavirus Act, official figures show the law has been wrongly used to prosecute 141 people

It has been used unlawfully in every single case so far, and more are going through the courts

independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…
Several human rights groups are campaigning for schedule 21 of the act, which creates criminal offences, to be repealed

It gives police the power to direct “potentially infectious persons” to a place suitable for screening and assessment, and makes it an offence to refuse
The Coronavirus Act was drawn up in March, when the threat was mainly perceived to come from abroad, and places where infectious people can be detained were never set up

The Health Protection Regulations were later introduced under a separate law to enforce lockdown restrictions
Many wrongful prosecutions appear to stem from the early similarity between the Health Protection Regulations (which then banned going outside without reasonable excuse) and Coronavirus Act

The regulations have been updated but the Act has not

independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lizzie Dearden

Lizzie Dearden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lizziedearden

Jan 28
There's a lot of confusion about the counter-extremism sprint and what's happening with it. My understanding is:

🔹ministers have not made a decision on what, if any, recommendations to adopt and will announce when they do
🔹a new definition of extremism wasn't in sprint's remit
🔹according to the Policy Exchange report on the leaked review, it said a new definition announced by then-communities secretary Michael Gove last year (below) "should not be formally dropped...but should not be a major part of the Government’s approach" Image
🔹according to Policy Exchange report, a key recommendation is for "an approach based on behaviours that cause harm rather than one based on a definition.”
🔹areas of concern included misogyny, conspiracy theories, violence fixations, incels and the manosphere
Read 6 tweets
Jan 6
The man who set up a Telegram account used to organise and incite riots following the Southport attack has been jailed

Andrew McIntyre, 39, started "Southport Wake Up" and attended disorder in Southport on 30 July and in Liverpool on 3 August himself. He was jailed for 7.5 years Image
Not only did McIntyre circulate lists of potential targets, including a list of immigration advice centres and refugee charities, he shared neo-Nazi content and explicit calls for murder, including "kill all Muslims", "every single brown cunt must die" and "burn all mosques"
Other messages posted by McIntyre on the Southport Wake Up Telegram include "get ready for war lads" and "Adolf Hitler was the only politician since Roman times to truly care for his people...THE FIGHT WILL BE LONG BROTHERS, BUT WE WILL SUCCEED. NEVER CAPITULATE"
Read 7 tweets
Dec 2, 2024
In July, I FOI'd the Home Office for the full breakdown of spending on the Rwanda scheme

I was refused because the government planned to publish the data in future, and today is the day. These numbers are in millions

gov.uk/government/pub…Image
Of the £715m spent, which does not include wider costs to the asylum system include decisions slowing and hotels rocketing:

💷£270m was to Rwanda's Economic Transformation and Integration Fund (unrelated to people being sent) and £20m was for operational spending by Rwanda
💷£95m was went on "investment to optimise capacity within the existing detention estate" and "options to increase detention capacity",which I first reported last November

There wasn't enough room to hold asylum seekers the Tories wanted to send to Rwanda
inews.co.uk/news/politics/…
Read 6 tweets
Oct 29, 2024
This is unbelievably lazy and dangerous, especially from a former solicitor running to lead the Conservative Party

Robert Jenrick gets the charges wrong then launches into "cover-up" dogwhistle while surely knowing how the law limits what information can be released before trial
"The Southport attack hit me personally," Jenrick claims. But somehow there's no mention of the actual victims or their families

Keir Starmer is unlikely to be able to directly respond to this in any depth for obvious legal and ethical reasons, which Jenrick probably knows
Merseyside Police saw this sort of thing coming and issued a direct plea today. Have Jenrick and other politicians read it and chosen to ignore it, or just not bothered?

"We all need to do the right thing by [victims and families] to ensure the justice process is not prejudiced” Image
Read 5 tweets
Oct 25, 2024
Breaking: A neo-Nazi has been convicted of attempting to murder an asylum seeker at a hotel in Worcester in April

Callum Parslow launched his terror attack while on bail for targeting a black woman with racist and sexual messages online. His victim survived Image
Parslow's trial began at Leicester Crown Court on 7 October but the media has been unable to publish anything until now because of reporting restrictions

They were imposed until the outcome of a second trial he faced for other offences, but he just changed his plea to guilty
Parslow admitted sending sexual and racist messages online in July and August last year, which he previously denied

He was arrested in December 2023 but freed on bail and committed the terror attack on 2 April

He is expected to be sentenced in December at Woolwich Crown Court
Read 4 tweets
Jul 30, 2024
Because of the misinformation about the horrific attack in Southport, I am going to use this thread to give factual information on how mass stabbings are investigated and what the involvement of counter-terrorism police means

These are general processes not specific to this case
In cases of all kinds, police are banned from identifying suspects who have been arrested until they are charged with an offence

If the suspect is under18, they have automatic anonymity. It lifts when they turn 18, unless further restrictions made, or when a judge orders it
Counter-terrorism police involvement in an investigation does not mean that the incident is terrorism, and they have been involved in many cases that were not e.g. the Nottingham stabbings

They are often drawn in following murders or mass killings where the motive is uncertain
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(