Lizzie Dearden Profile picture
Sep 29, 2020 4 tweets 2 min read Read on X
As MPs prepare to vote on extending the Coronavirus Act, official figures show the law has been wrongly used to prosecute 141 people

It has been used unlawfully in every single case so far, and more are going through the courts

independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…
Several human rights groups are campaigning for schedule 21 of the act, which creates criminal offences, to be repealed

It gives police the power to direct “potentially infectious persons” to a place suitable for screening and assessment, and makes it an offence to refuse
The Coronavirus Act was drawn up in March, when the threat was mainly perceived to come from abroad, and places where infectious people can be detained were never set up

The Health Protection Regulations were later introduced under a separate law to enforce lockdown restrictions
Many wrongful prosecutions appear to stem from the early similarity between the Health Protection Regulations (which then banned going outside without reasonable excuse) and Coronavirus Act

The regulations have been updated but the Act has not

independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lizzie Dearden

Lizzie Dearden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lizziedearden

May 29
The government has responded to this High Court order, stating that it "does not intend to carry out enforced removals to Rwanda before the General Election on 4 July 2024"

The FDA's legal challenge against the Safety of Rwanda Act is going ahead on 6 June
The government missed its initial Friday deadline for responding to the order, claiming it was “unable” to state the earliest date for removals and was given an extension until Tuesday

Another order had to be made on that yesterday, pretty chaotic Image
This is the new order Image
Read 4 tweets
May 28
Oh wow. In a rare move, the High Court has issued an order for the government to formally inform it of "the earliest date on which the Government intend to begin removals to Rwanda"

Because Rishi Sunak's media statement on Thursdsy directly contradicted its own legal arguments Image
This is the legal challenge against the Safety of Rwanda guidance for civil servants, brought by the FDA union

The government was reprimanded by the High Court on 10 May for messing it about with dates, which affected how the case was scheduled
The government originally wrote to the High Court claiming “the earliest a removal is expected to take place is 1 to 15 July 2024”, but then wrote again saying the date was based on 22 April Sunak press conference and 10 to 12 weeks was actually the "week
commencing 24 June"
Read 6 tweets
May 17
New: The Home Office has already started freeing people it detained for Rwanda flights

It will not confirm how many asylum seekers have so far been granted immigration bail but applications were expected. It plans to keep detaining more people to fill allocated detention space
It is responding to individual legal challenges against detention as they come, which can be based on someone's individual vulnerabilities or an argument they will not be deported in a "reasonable period"

The applications are handled by independent judges rather than Home Office
The detention operation - codenamed Operation Vector - only started a couple of weeks ago, and Rwanda flights are still at least 7 weeks away according to the government's own timetable

Many more bail applications will be lodged in that time
Read 4 tweets
Apr 22
A late addition:

On appeals against being sent to Rwanda, the PM claimed: "The judiciary have made available 25 courtrooms and identified 150 judges who could provide over 5,000 sitting days"

A judicial spokesman said: "The deployment of judges is a matter for the judiciary..."
"...in line with new provisions in the Illegal Migration Act, the judiciary have identified a number of First Tier Tribunal judges who may be asked to sit in the Upper Tribunal to deal with any increase in appeals"

But decisions will be made by the Senior President of Tribunals
And take into "account the interests of justice and the need for all matters before the Tribunals to be handled quickly and efficiently"

Any decision on temporary deployment is for the judiciary, not the government, and there are already massive backlogs
inews.co.uk/news/politics/…
Read 4 tweets
Apr 22
Follow this thread for a fact-checked watch-along of prime minister Rishi Sunak's press conference on the Rwanda scheme Image
Wow he's going fast, I'll do my best

1. "We're going to deliver this indispensable deterrent so that we finally break the business model of the criminal gangs"

The Rwanda scheme required a rare ministerial direction because there is no evidence it will deter Channel crossings
2. "We've prepared for this moment to detain people while we prepare to remove them. We've increased detention spaces to 2,200 to quickly process claims"

By the end of December, 1,782 immigration detention centres were full, because they are needed for many other purposes Image
Read 11 tweets
Mar 9
Exclusive: The Home Office has been quietly rolling out a multi-million IT system that was supposed to "automate" asylum, citizenship and visa cases

It's now causing chaos, with errors, bugs and delays leaving staff "sobbing" while applicants suffer
inews.co.uk/news/politics/…
At least £71m has so far been spent on the Atlas digital caseworking system and spending is rising, with the Home Office admitting “significant resource is being put in place to resolve” issues

Some of the glitches have been classified as a P1 “critical” technical incidents
It has been causing delays to applications including British citizenship, skilled worker visas, asylum claims, EU settlement scheme and Homes for Ukraine, while slowing down immigration enforcement operations

Some cases get stuck, while civil servants get locked out of others
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(