Important voting rights update in Ohio: for two years, Ohio's SOS has claimed he could not allow online or electronic applications for absentee ballots. Ohio law didn't permit it, he said, insisting he needed legislative approval.
We went to court to show he was wrong...
1/
Several weeks ago, a common pleas court agreed with us, but he (of course) appealed immediately.
This afternoon, we got our ruling on that appeal.
The disappointing news is that we did not get the relief/injunction we were seeking immediately.
The good news? ...
2/
Like the court below, the appeals court agreed that nothing in OH law prevents the acceptance of electronic applications of absentee ballots: "Having reviewed R.C. 3509.03, we find the plain language of the Gen'l Assembly does not prohibit qualified electors from making.."
3/
"... a written absentee ballot application to the county director of elections by email or fax or otherwise.”
It later said again: "Nothing in this determination should be read as limiting the secretary from, in an exercise of his reasonable discretion..."
4/
"...implementing R.C. 3509.03 to permit methods of delivery other than mail or in-person should the circumstances warrant it.”
The court did not agree with our effort to immediately allow such applications to be made, or that LaRose was required to do so, but our core...
5/
...effort was always to make clear that Ohio law currently allows applications to be sent electronically.
For two years, LaRose said he couldn't do so. And for two years, it turns out, he's been wrong.
6/
So as we and others have said all along, there is nothing in Ohio law right now stopping the acceptance of electronic or online applications--the only thing that's been stopping it is LaRose himself.
While we will weigh our short-term options with this case as to relief,...
7/
...clearing this part up is a long-term win for Ohio voters.
Bottom line: it's long past time for LaRose to stop hiding behind phantom laws for his unwillingness to do things. It's time for him to get to work.
END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Few authors have more informed (and reshaped) my understanding of American history than Isabel Wilkerson.
I had the honor and thrill of hearing her speak the other night, and she shared a story and lesson I will never forget.
1/
I couldn’t take notes as she told it, but I will capture it as best I can, having done a little research to fill it out.
In the early to mid-1900s, millions of Black Americans migrated north, escaping the punishing life and crushing poverty of the Jim Crow south.
2/
As Wilkerson describes, these families were basically defectors: “American citizens [who] had to flee the place of their birth just to be recognized as the citizens they had always been. It was the seeking of political asylum from within the borders of one’s own country.”
3/
According to Strength in Numbers, “search interest for “Cancel Disney+” has hit an all-time high — even higher than the boycott movements from when Disney “went woke” in 2020-2022.
1/
The current Disney boycott is now 4x as large as any over the last 5 years, gauged by search interest.”
And those searches were just the beginning:
2/
And yesterday, we saw the result of that fierce consumer backlash:
A few weeks ago, when discussing the raid of John Bolton’s home, Vance kept describing the investigation with the words “we” and “our.”
It showed that Project 2025’s goal of erasing any independence of the FBI has happened.
And the true danger of that red line…
1/
…being crossed is playing out right now, amid the Kirk investigation.
“We.”
“Our.”
Trump. Vance. Miller. Bondi. Patel.
When it comes to an FBI investigation, they are all now one and the same.
2/
Which of course means that those who have already decided and announced who’s to blame and who should be punished are also the ones overseeing the investigation and, according to Trump yesterday, charges that follow.
3/