Important voting rights update in Ohio: for two years, Ohio's SOS has claimed he could not allow online or electronic applications for absentee ballots. Ohio law didn't permit it, he said, insisting he needed legislative approval.
We went to court to show he was wrong...
1/
Several weeks ago, a common pleas court agreed with us, but he (of course) appealed immediately.
This afternoon, we got our ruling on that appeal.
The disappointing news is that we did not get the relief/injunction we were seeking immediately.
The good news? ...
2/
Like the court below, the appeals court agreed that nothing in OH law prevents the acceptance of electronic applications of absentee ballots: "Having reviewed R.C. 3509.03, we find the plain language of the Gen'l Assembly does not prohibit qualified electors from making.."
3/
"... a written absentee ballot application to the county director of elections by email or fax or otherwise.”
It later said again: "Nothing in this determination should be read as limiting the secretary from, in an exercise of his reasonable discretion..."
4/
"...implementing R.C. 3509.03 to permit methods of delivery other than mail or in-person should the circumstances warrant it.”
The court did not agree with our effort to immediately allow such applications to be made, or that LaRose was required to do so, but our core...
5/
...effort was always to make clear that Ohio law currently allows applications to be sent electronically.
For two years, LaRose said he couldn't do so. And for two years, it turns out, he's been wrong.
6/
So as we and others have said all along, there is nothing in Ohio law right now stopping the acceptance of electronic or online applications--the only thing that's been stopping it is LaRose himself.
While we will weigh our short-term options with this case as to relief,...
7/
...clearing this part up is a long-term win for Ohio voters.
Bottom line: it's long past time for LaRose to stop hiding behind phantom laws for his unwillingness to do things. It's time for him to get to work.
END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
JD Vance flies to Indiana.
In the wide open, he and other federal officials pressure state leaders to rig Indiana’s map to help seal House elections outcome 15 months in advance.
1/
Specifically, by giving themselves two extra seats in the House, and eliminating all Democratic seats in the Hoosier State.
2/
In one twisted way, JD’s visit and open pressuring of state officials to hand him those House seats is helpful.
Because it makes perfectly clear that we are watching November 2020-January 2021 all over again—Trump’s just doing it before the 2026 elections rather than after.
3/
A brand new poll shows that, at + 10, @amyactonoh has the highest job approval rating in the state.
By a lot.
2/
Combine that with the fact that Vivek Ramaswamy has unusually high negatives (basically accomplishing this all on his own 👀) and this race for Governor is tied even in a sample that decisively voted for Trump.
Thank you to those Texas Democrats taking their courageous stand, and thank you to those supporting them in Texas and beyond. Standing up to the anti-democratic tactics of Trump and state leaders
1/
like Abbott is absolutely critical at the moment.
In fact, there is no choice.
As a matter of strategic action, and as a matter of message.
In fact, if our actions don’t match our words, we lose!
2/
For good and for bad, we project powerful messages way beyond the words we use. Drew Westen calls it our “meta-message”— what we communicate from our action or inaction, and the urgency with which we act.
3/