David Pepper Profile picture
Sep 30, 2020 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
THREAD

For two years, Frank Larose has engaged in a charade.

A game.

He has said he WANTS to allow voters to request absentee ballots online, but....that Ohio law doesn't allow him to.

If only the legislature would do it's job, he said, he would allow online applications

1/
He said this every time this came up.

Here's one example: "Ohio's elections chief LaRose says he needs lawmakers' approval to move forward with online ballot requests."

2/

cincinnati.com/story/news/202…
Here he said it again: "he even agrees with several of the changes proposed. But, despite advocates’ insistence to the contrary, LaRose does not feel he has the authority to take these actions unilaterally..."

3/

ohiocapitaljournal.com/2020/08/05/ele…
On online applications: "LaRose agrees on this issue, but has resisted taking action by himself."

4/

ohiocapitaljournal.com/2020/08/05/ele…
We got so tired of hearing this false excuse for LaRose not doing his job (nothing in OH law prevents online applications) we took him to court

We went to court to prove that he has the authority to do something he says he wants to do

And we won

5/

cleveland.com/open/2020/09/j…
So of course, LaRose appealed immediately.

And yesterday, we received an appellate ruling.

Let me clear, we didn't receive the immediate relief we sought. That is disappointing.

But on the fundamental question that brought us to court in the first place?

6/
On this two-year narrative by LaRose that Ohio law has kept him from implementing online applications?

The Court agreed with us: “Having reviewed R.C. 3509.03, we find the plain language of the General Assembly does not prohibit qualified electors from making a written..."

7/
"...absentee ballot application to the county director of elections by email or fax or otherwise.”"

The law is not the problem, the Court is confirming.

Then later: “Nothing in this determination should be read as limiting the secretary from, in an exercise..."

8/
"...of his reasonable discretion, implementing R.C. 3509.03 to permit methods of delivery other than mail or in-person should the circumstances warrant it.”

Again, the court is saying LaRose can DO online or electronic applications if he wants to. It's up to him.

9/
So LaRose wasted two years telling the state he couldn't implement a 21st century system many other states have implemented, when it fact he could have done so all along.

He's been wrong the entire time, requiring voters to print, mail and put stamps on these applications

10/
Our only hope now is that after yesterday's ruling, he can finally stop pretending the law is an obstacle here, and he can start doing what so many other states have been doing without problems.

He's wasted enough time on this already.

Please get to work.

END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Pepper

David Pepper Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DavidPepper

Mar 27
🚨 🚨

Quick take on Signal Gate

A 🧵

Beyond the egregious security breach involved, the Signal scandal also puts on full display:

1) the appalling dishonesty of these people (lying with gusto even after incriminating evidence is out in the open);

1/ Image
2) their sheer incompetence/arrogance (they essentially invited Goldberg to release the messages with all their trash talk and bald-faced lies);

3) the inability of most GOP legislators to call out anything—

2/
including something this egregious;

4) and the fact that Trump does not appear to be in charge of his own administration, or briefed on their actions, even when it involves the military

3/
Read 6 tweets
Mar 26
🚨 🚨

Last night’s big PA Surprise

Short 🧵

I chatted with a PA Dem strategist who wears the opposite of rose-colored glasses about last night’s surprise upset in PA.

He was not involved in the race.

A few quotes:

1/ Image
“[F]rom a ‘sign of the political winds,’ the victory last night was significant for several reasons: first, turnout was quite high for a random March date.

Second, this turf has been Republican since the Civil War…”

2/
“….it does NOT include the city of Lancaster (which is quite blue)—that’s different than some of these “Obama-Trump” regions that may be inclined to switch back — there’s no legacy of Democratic victories in this part of Lancaster County.”

3/
Read 5 tweets
Mar 24
🚨 🚨

“Will we even have future elections?”

The trap

A 🧵

It comes up regularly in meetings and zoom calls I’ve participated in.

Sometimes as a throwaway line.

Sometimes more seriously.

“Will we even have elections?”

1/
And it’s a dangerous question.

Not because we won’t have elections.

But because if enough people start to believe that the answer is “no,” then they won’t engage.

They won’t prepare. They won’t bother.

2/
And the loss in the elections that do take place becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Trump sparked this precise effect in the Georgia run-offs for US Senate in January 2021.

3/
Read 9 tweets
Mar 24
🚨 🚨

The Caving Continues

A 🧵

Another day, another institution caves to the threats and shakedowns of Donald Trump.

And the pattern is clear: the more powerful institutions are, the more likely they are to comply.

1/ Image
My law school classmate and friend @DavidLat shared on his substack an email from the chairman of the firm Paul Weiss (Brad Karp), where he described the situation the firm faced:

2/
“Only several days ago, our firm faced an existential crisis. The executive order could easily have destroyed our firm. It brought the full weight of the government down on our firm, our people, and our clients…

3/
Read 13 tweets
Mar 23
🚨 🚨

More details are coming out that many of those whisked away to El Salvador did not have criminal records, and do not appear to have been part of a gang of any sort:

1/ Image
Image
To sum it up, they were flown off to a prison in El Salvador with no due process—treated as “alien enemies” under a law meant for wartime, as if the United States is at war with Venezuela (when we clearly are not).

2/
And of course, they are only in that prison now because the Trump administration ignored a court order to send them back.

3/
Read 5 tweets
Mar 22
🚨 🚨

Columbia Caves

A 🧵

If we’ve learned anything during the Trump era, it’s that once you cave to a bully, the bullying is just getting started.

So isn’t hard to see how this plays out from here: Follow-up letters by the Trump administration…

1/ Image
unsatisfied with Columbia’s response and demanding even more concessions. Then more caving by Columbia. And downhill from there.

And buoyed by his success with Columbia, Trump will no doubt make similar “hold-ups” and lists

2/
of demands of other private and public universities—leveraging federal money for certain purposes to demand concessions in all sorts of other areas.

3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(